Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-06 06:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2925 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2925 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-06 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-06 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-06 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:12 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 00:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
But I don't think Goat!Anon is truly a goat.
OR ARE THEY?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 00:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 01:28 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 04:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 03:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:03 am (UTC)(link)I think it's more a quirk of how fanfiction gets written than anything else
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 12:10 am (UTC)(link)With quite a few canon m/f pairs, I think the authors/writers take it for granted that the audience will be into them just because they're a romance and don't spend nearly enough time setting up or developing the pairing. IMO, of course.
no subject
no subject
And tbh, I didn't realize this until just now. For a while, I've been like, "but why am I not into slash?" I suppose I owe you my thanks, OP.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Not saying you are or anything, but this is something I find rather frustrating about fandom.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 01:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 06:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 06:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 07:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Like, I'm gay. I like guys. Naturally, when I read romance, I usually want it to be about two guys. (Though for the past year or two, the only ship that has really been of interest to me is two girls. Oops!)
But it actually really bothers me that men, in fiction and out, are often only allowed to express things like emotional pain or fear in the context of same-sex relationships. That just has always felt kinda sad to me, you know; that's not a lesson I would want, say, my straight little brother to learn.
I dunno. I just want guys to feel okay crying and being upset with their girlfriends (or their platonic friends!) too.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 03:13 am (UTC)(link)It seems like people are more tolerant of men not sticking to gender roles in a same-sex relationship. Maybe it's because of stereotypes about gay men being feminine (or straight men always being masculine - I've noticed that many people will have no problem accepting that a gay man can be masculine, but will refuse to believe that a feminine man can be straight). Or maybe they think one person in a relationship always has to be "the man" so a guy can be less masculine (not that I think showing emotion is necessarily unmasculine) with another guy but not with a girl. And sometimes I wonder if it's because it's okay for a man to see their partner's vulnerable side, but if you're a woman, your partner is supposed to be tough and dominating and protect you (and possibly keep you in line :/ ) so you can't be allowed to see any "weakness."
Anyway, I really hate the idea that it's okay for a guy to be emotional or not fit gender stereotypes in a same sex relationship, but has to be Manly McTestosterone with a woman.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 05:20 am (UTC)(link)In real life, however, I'm the opposite. I like to be with men who are open with their emotions and don't mind showing them. I'm always baffled by those who say they can't stand men crying. What, all men, under every circumstance? I can't imagine living like that.
So perhaps if you see it as a literary convention or plot device rather than something that really exists it might be easier. In real life, I've not noticed that women are more emotionally literate than men. Some of the most emotionally repressed people I know are women.
Similarly, most het fiction is written with men as the dominant partner, while that's about the opposite to what I see in real life. It's just fantasy. A very popular fantasy that baffles me, but there you go.
In fic, I like my emotionally repressed guy slash. It's probably why I'm not big into hurt/comfort fic between two men either. It doesn't have anything to do with real life. I'd be appalled at the thought of any of the gay couples I really know being as screwed up as the slash couples I write.
(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) 2015-01-07 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)It honestly makes me worry a little about the fanfiction writers and their love lives, their idea of how guys behave seem so based on media, and that can't possibly be healthy for anyone...
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-07 19:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-08 14:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-08 15:38 (UTC) - ExpandThis was probably way more serious of an answer than you wanted.