Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-26 07:15 pm
[ SECRET POST #2945 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2945 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Not a Harem Heaven, It's a Yandere Hell]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
04.

[In the Flesh]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Hudson Leick as Callisto in Xena, Warrior Princess]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Plebcomics]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Great British Bake Off]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Captain America: The First Avenger]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Binan Koukou Chikyuu Bouei-bu LOVE!]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Queen]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
--Rogan
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
--Rogan
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 08:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)But it's always strawmen when others do it.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Never heard that term before, but it's perfect.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:13 am (UTC)(link)that term is making me think that tumblr activism has taken cannibalistic turns. O_O
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:17 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 01:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 02:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 02:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 06:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 07:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 12:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 10:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 18:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 10:48 (UTC) - ExpandThis Thread: A Summary
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 18:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: This Thread: A Summary
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 19:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: This Thread: A Summary
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 20:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-28 08:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 12:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 14:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 15:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 20:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Can you even read?
DA
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 03:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 03:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 03:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 11:05 (UTC) - ExpandDDA
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 05:41 am (UTC)(link)You could argue it's a reaction to the kind of SJW that insists on speaking for minorities about how something is so racist or appropriative or whatnot and then invalidating their disagreement by telling them they have "internalized prejudice" (because disagreement is apparently just not allowed). As an Asian-American who occasionally gets lectured by non-Asians that such-and-such movie totally fell into the trap of confusing two Asian countries for each other (when it didn't) or that people wearing clothing from my culture is appropriation (when it's not) or that what I consider mildly cringeworthy behavior in a foreign country is actually despicable and racist as fuck and worthy of this person being publicly shamed forever... I TOTALLY sympathize with this anti-SJW sentiment and have felt these feelings.
However, it's also arguably tied to the whole #NotYourShield movement within the Gamergate movement, which is about having women/minorities step up to say how the gaming world is NOT hostile or exclusionary towards women/minorities. From this comic you can either draw the conclusion that the point is "white people need to check themselves" OR that the point is that the existence of a single minority person who disagrees with race criticism INVALIDATES that criticism because inevitably the side that agrees with that race criticism contains white people (actually, is predominantly white because that's what the U.S. is), which means the relationship depicted in the comic is guaranteed to come into play (white people trying to talk over a disagreeing minority). If you agree this dynamic is undesirable, and they show the existence of a POC who disagrees with some social justice platform, then they show that the social justice platform as a whole is undesirable and has no leg to stand on. So basically, the point of the comic could be seen as being anti-SJ as a whole, not just anti-SJW.
Re: DDA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 06:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DDA
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-27 06:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
--Rogan
no subject
I can only say you probably want to keep it that way.
no subject
I became homeless leaving abusive people in my past. So did other people I know. I don't think we were 'privileged' for that.
--Rogan
no subject
And I've seen some of this bs with my own eyes. like, white chicks calling out black/desi/latina girls for being "racist" for disagreeing with their nonsense opinions. It's baffling.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Strangely, even with plenty of screencaps of big GG players bragging about their sockpuppets, some people believed them to be real women who knew the truth. And so that comic was one of the many standing up for those poor poor sockpuppets.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 01:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
What really baffles me is, if they did... SO WHAT? Just because you have a certain identity label doesn't mean you can't be WRONG. Sure, there are probably some women who were treated wonderfully by the gamers around them... but that doesn't magically erase the women who were treated BADLY.
I don't know why I'm trying to make sense of this when obviously there is no sense to be had.
--Rogan
no subject
That comic pre-dates Gamergate, iirc.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)And as the other anon said: This comic has nothing at all to do with GG.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-27 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)Correction: blitzwing, not another anon said it.