Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-04-21 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3030 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3030 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)so I take it you haven't paid attention whatsoever to the Hugos or SFWA or science fiction fandom in genreal in the last... month or so, then
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)Nope...I saw one (1) article on Teleread about it, but I didn't really follow up, other than figuring out what people were talking about when they were referencing Sad Puppies/Rabid Puppies. I do recall in the early aughts, hearing all kinds of complaining from pros and semi-pros about how logrolling was way frowned on, they just couldn't do it, they would be disqualified, etc. But that was (wow I'm old) well over a decade ago.
What happened, anon? Telllll meeeeeeeee....
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)I'm sure you can fill in the details on most of the rest of the controversy on your own if you have any familiarity with Internet SF fandom slapfighting.
AYRT
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)So, question: Has SFWA now withdrawn all the nominations/nominees completely? Or is it too close to WorldCon to do that now?
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)One person refused the nomination, and three withdrew after being nominated. A fourth is attempting to withdraw, but it's past the deadline to do so. There's also a pretty big campaign to vote No Award in the impacted categories.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 12:25 am (UTC)(link)That's a bit of relief; hopefully the campaign succeeds. This "Vox Day" character (Or is this a sock of the Wright guy??) did pretty much the one thing that's not supposed to be done when it comes to the Hugos. Regardless if there's a loophole or not. I certainly don't trust Scalzi's word that there is, or that logrolling was somehow within the rules.
After reading the other thread (again) I'm the nonnie who commented, "The '80s called they want Niven and Pournelle's love-child back" the first time this came up LOL.
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 01:34 am (UTC)(link)He's basically a fundamentalist anti-woman nrx bigot who, from his actions, seems like he would be pretty okay with destroying the SFWA as a whole because it's too leftist and 'cultural marxist'
In fairness to him, he's not the only one who organized the logrolling. Otoh, the fact that the other organizers essentially brought him in, and talked about how he's a 'gentleman', and AFAIK are still making excuses for him (correct me if I'm wrong on that) is one of the things that personally infuriates me most about the whole situation.
OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 01:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 02:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2015-04-22 03:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-28 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 11:41 am (UTC)(link)Quick clarifying note: WSFS (World Science Fiction Society) is the organization responsible for the Hugos and Worldcon; SFWA does the Nebulas.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)*rimshot*
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 12:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 02:58 am (UTC)(link)The Sad Puppies claim to be reasonable and not crazy bigots, but they pretty much owe their momentum to the Rabid Puppies, helmed by Theodore Beale aka Vox Day, a crazy racist bigot who thinks women shouldn't have the vote. Beale actually invited GamerGate types to buy WorldCon memberships and vote in his slate picks, and apparently enough of them did. John C. Wright in particular made out like a bandit.
It's not settled yet, it just got them on the ballot. The vote has yet to go down and lots of fans are very angry they've gamed the system this way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-22 11:53 am (UTC)(link)Beale wasn't the only one to reach out to Gamergate; Larry Correia did, as well. https://twitter.com/avram/status/585217911431761921
no subject