case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-06-07 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3077 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3077 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Lackadaisy Cats]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Gorillaz)


__________________________________________________



04.
(Tripping over you)


__________________________________________________



05.
[Stitchers]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Dragon Age]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Mighty Boosh]


__________________________________________________



08.
[LOVE LIVE!]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Brooklyn 99]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Mad Max Fury Road]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Maggie Stiefvater]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Emily Alice Ovenden]


__________________________________________________



13.
[When Marnie Was There/Omoide no Marnie]


__________________________________________________



14.
(Rick and Morty)


__________________________________________________



15.
[Suppression]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Wall-e]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Ancillary Justice & Ancillary Sword]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #440.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Recalling a former wank.

Those with pets:

Would you rather rescue your pet(s) or a stranger's infant from a fire? Assuming the other will die, no one else is around to help, and no one will see you do whatever it is you decide.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
My pet
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2015-06-07 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Stranger's infant. No debate. I love my pets but a dog is not a person. And a dog lives (on average) like 60 years less than a human.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
This.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
And giant tortoises on average live way longer than humans. Would you save that?

I get that it's a moralistic thing where humans > all, but sheer lifespan is a bad argument for it
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2015-06-07 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Lifespan is just one of the reasons I'd choose a person. Intelligence is another and I don't consider tortoises all that intelligent. So they are out.

So when it comes down to two intelligent beings, I'd choose the one who lives longest.

Of course, I also think that human > animals.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh no I got where you were coming from, I meant the way you put it and pointed out the human lives longer made it sound like that was the reason and not "humans > animals regardless of anything"

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-06-07 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, I'd probably rescue my pet. There is no shortage of either pets or children, really, and it would come down to the being I would be more motivated to save.

That being would be the one I love, not the one I have no connection to.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] mekkio 2015-06-07 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Saving the kid. Because if you didn't you would have to face that child's parents. Good luck with telling them, "Sorry. My dog comes before your kid. Deal with it."

Yeah, that's not going to end up well.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
No one saw you save the dog, so they can't blame you for not saving their kid unless you go tell them you had time and chose not to.
elaminator: (Metal Gear Solid 3: Ocelot)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] elaminator 2015-06-07 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
As much as I love my pet (and it would seriously kill me to let something happen to it, ugh, these questions are evil, why am I answering them), I would rescue the infant.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Pet.

I'll grant that the infant has more potential, but not all potential is realized and honestly, compared to a 1 month old human, my 10 year old dog has more intelligence and emotion at this point in time. The infant is too young even have a sense of self or danger or betrayal, whereas my buddy of 10+ years would be in the fire yelping for help and wondering why I'm walking away from him.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

(Anonymous) 2015-06-07 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
SA

Plus when I adopted an animal, I made it a promise that I'll look after it and it will be my personal responsibility for the rest of its life. I made that promise and I adopted the animal, I owe it to the pet to do whatever I can. I don't feel that personal responsibility toward a stranger's infant. I didn't sign up to be its protector. I did sign up to be the protector of my pet. I betray no one by not saving an infant, but I do betray myself and an innocent animal by not saving my pet.

That's how I feel on the issue anyway.
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2015-06-07 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
If the human is incapable of helping themselves, then I help them. If not, you're on your own, bud.

I can actually say this with 100% conviction, because I am that asshole who walked out of a burning building carrying my dog, and purposely left behind a human idiot.
I did tell him that the building was on fire and he should get out. That's as far as my heroics extend when I don't actually like you and you can find the damn door on your own.

And yes, people actually recoiled when I was able to calmly explain that I left someone to die. He didn't, FYI.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] solticisekf 2015-06-07 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Was your house on fire? Were you ok?
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2015-06-08 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
It was very much on fire. I had some burns inside my nose and my lungs were gross for a week or so, but otherwise the damage was mostly the being homeless and lacking material possessions and money. It turns out you can't access your bank account without your cards or your ID or a birth certificate. Also, when insurance agencies say they will provide you with temporary accommodation in the event of an emergency, what they actually mean is they will tell you they can't authorise the expenditure right away, which really means they're desperately trying to find a reason to invalidate your entire policy so they don't have to give you a cent.

If I sound bitter it's because I am. I'm not even sure what the question was. Argh.

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] solticisekf 2015-06-08 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
That sucks. Having no place to stay in addition to seeing the fire and brathing smoke. I was in a burning car once, it was very stressful.
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2015-06-08 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yikes!

P.S.
I can't deal with how adorable your icon is. Is that a hedgehog? I want one.
caerbannog: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] caerbannog 2015-06-08 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
That's all reasonable in my books. You look after yourself first and you let others know but you're not trained or expected to go in and grab the other person. Yelling out fire and getting the fuck out is the expectation (and tbh if I was in a duplex or whatever with a fire I'd grab my pets and get out while yelling fire, but i'm not hanging around trying to find other people. That'd just get us all dead.)
belladonna_took: richard armitage (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] belladonna_took 2015-06-08 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Idk. I guess people have this idea that you're supposed to evacuate in an orderly fashion at the same time? My neighbours were all asking me where he was and I was like "I assume he'll be out shortly" and they clearly thought I had snapped and tried to kill him or something.
Then the cops showed up and remarked on how abnormally calm I was. That's the PTSD. Making people think I'm a sociopath and shit. :/

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] solticisekf 2015-06-07 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
What is with the questions here, honestly. oO I'd rather a baby/kid/adult/old person lives.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-06-08 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Infant all the way. I'd never live with myself if I chose otherwise.
caerbannog: (Thistle)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] caerbannog 2015-06-08 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
I love my pets but I would rescue the infant. Then go back for the pets in an attempt unless it is too dangerous to go back again.

But that's all a very hard choice, in all liklihood they'd be near each other and I'd just grab both.

Also in order it'd go rabbits, then baby, then dog because that's roughly the vulnerability going on. Rabbits would die first so I'd grab them first. Dog and baby are pretty easy to grab at once.
Edited 2015-06-08 00:43 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-06-08 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
I would rescue the infant (assuming it was clear to me that it was still alive) but it would be extremely painful. :(

I'd do my damndest to get them both out though.

I think if it were a situation where I assumed I'd have time to deal with them both I'd get the baby first, unless the pet were more likely to die right away, but it's actually a harder decision to make if I knew I could only pick one.

I also find this a harder situation than the bus one above because it feels less absolute. There's likely no way I'd KNOW for sure that I could only rescue one, but if someone put the buttons in front of me and said "choose" I'd have to pick. So I'd still be inclined to try to rescue both if I believed it were possible.
dahli: winnar @ lj (Default)

Re: A different kind of Ask thread

[personal profile] dahli 2015-06-08 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)


Honestly, I wouldn't even think twice and I'd try to save both because I'm fucking stubborn when it comes to saving people.