Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-03 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3134 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3134 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #448.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)I talked my SO into trying pegging as research. :p
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)I...think it's probably been one for a very long time?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Mary Magdalen learned a lot from her time as a prostitue and Jesus took great pleasure in her skills.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 00:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 00:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)but hey, I'm queer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Even though I like the idea of pegging partly because it seems dominant, I kind of hate the idea that penetration = dominance always. Honestly, I think that idea comes from women being being expected to be submissive, but people have sort of turned it the other way around, so a woman can be dominant, but only if she's penetrating someone. There's just no reason penetration NEEDS to be an act of dominance (though if you want it to be, that's fine too).
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 00:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 08:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 08:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 01:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 02:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-08-04 01:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)I love how people abloobloo that OMG SEX ISN'T NECESSARY but that doesn't stop the fact that if you're not an asexual and you would like to have sex and can't do so for some reason then it kind of blows chunks.
It's like wanting to eat a pizza but having to drink water instead.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Anon didn't say it didn't blow chunks. But, something blowing chunks doesn't mean people are justified in being bitter cynics accusing others of doing things just to brag either.
It sucks to want pizza but have to drink water. That doesn't make it reasonable to accuse random people talking about what to have for dinner of bragging about how they have food and you don't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 01:18 am (UTC)(link)It can suck to be reminded, I get that... attributing other people talking about it to malice or selfishness just because it's something you want and don't have is a step too far, is all I'm saying.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 01:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 03:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 02:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 02:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-04 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)Sex is definitely a case in which having the wrong kind of it is way worse than having none at all, whether in terms of status or, really, of just not having a fucked up life that will haunt you forever.
no subject
Assuming you're talking about conventional attractiveness (which, don't forget, doesn't equal objective attractiveness for everyone) there's probably a correlation but even then it's not gonna be a surefire indicator.