Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-18 06:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #3180 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3180 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for domestic violence/abuse]

[The Musketeers]
__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape]

[Babylon 5]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

The Mummy
I'm curious if the creators of the film were aware of the fact that he has a point when he says that archaeology is grave desecration. Like, it's not a statement of fact, but it is a genuine concern for archaeologists themselves. Did the producers knowingly give the antagonist a viewpoint that could be considered valid? Or was it just a side effect of his EVIL EGYPTIANNESS?
Also, I kind of want to see a movie where the Christian god haunts and murders someone via his bloodthirsty angels, every single one of which is played by Christopher Lee.
Re: The Mummy
This is, at least, the tale according to my friends in archaeology.
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 12:54 am (UTC)(link)The protagonist saying that sounds accurate enough to the times, to be fair. The antagonist agreeing is the part that's weird and racist
Re: The Mummy
I was just really surprised and amused by how culturally insensitive the thing is.
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 01:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 01:14 am (UTC)(link)People post smug shit on the internet throwing around words like bigoted. Let's take it back 60/70 years and see whether you were one of the few who spoke out for civil rights, gay rights. Or even furher back, how many of us would have had the strength to stand up for women's rights in the fact of all that hostility?
How many of you are out there at protests to support the real issues? How many people who race to get offended at every single thing are out there standing with the people of Ferguson. Or any of the hundreds of causes that surely deserve some civil action in this world.
For fuck's sake.
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 01:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 01:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 01:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 02:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy
And I would totally, seriously watch a film along the lines of The Mummy where it's Christianity instead of ancient Egyptian religions.
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 12:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy
Seriously, the point of Hammer horror stuff is ANYTHING but historical or cultural accuracy. It's the aesthetic that matters. And Christianity has plenty of aesthetics that could be turned into a cheesy Hammer narrative?
When I said "along the lines of The Mummy", I didn't mean "literally like The Mummy in every way, only Christian". Just "a horror film based on distorted religious aesthetics and stereotypes about religion".
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 01:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 01:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 01:15 am (UTC)(link)But anyway, the only Mummy I've seen is the 1999 one.
Re: The Mummy
Cushing and Lee are superb in this, as always. The film isn't too remarkable in other ways if you aren't interested in the history of horror; but it's a joy to watch these two working together.
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 05:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 05:44 am (UTC)(link)Temple of Doom is wayyyyyy better than Crystal Skull. Temple of Doom is IMO unquestionably worth a watch, even if it's not on the level of Raiders. I really like Temple. Crystal Skull, on the other hand, is... not fantastic.
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) - 2015-09-19 06:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
Re: The Mummy
nonsensicalbold as the plot, it must be something I'd enjoy.Actually, I think it's pretty close to what I was craving here. Except maybe the fact that the level of cheesiness isn't as high as in Hammer stuff.
Re: The Mummy
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 05:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: The Mummy