case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-06 06:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3229 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3229 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Devil Survivor 2]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Undertale]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for How to Get Away With Murder]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Undertale]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for underage]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/MtRDOAU.jpg
[link for implied baby... sex? i don't know]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Question Thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
^^

Paypal

(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
How does this work exactly?
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

Re: Paypal

[personal profile] morieris 2015-11-06 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
It attaches to your bank account, and takes money out as needed and deposits money sent to you as needed. It's like a middleman for various online retailers (though ironically not Amazon), like sending a money order online.

Re: Paypal

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-06 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

[personal profile] morieris - 2015-11-07 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2015-11-07 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com - 2015-11-07 06:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Paypal

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
I use Paypal INSTEAD of a checking account. I just have a Paypal card that works like a debit/credit card, and that's how I use money.
caerbannog: (Default)

Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[personal profile] caerbannog 2015-11-06 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a question because I want to read everyones thoughts and try-hard!anon's trolling when I get back from the store

http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/study-suggests-women-are-all-bisexual-or-gay-almost-never-straight

--------copy past summary in next comment:
caerbannog: (Default)

Copy paste summary

[personal profile] caerbannog 2015-11-06 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)


What turns us on and where we place ourselves on the sexual spectrum is exceedingly personal. A new study investigating the existence of this spectrum may prove somewhat controversial, then: It claims that women are almost always gay or bisexual and are almost certainly not straight. The research has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Previous studies using volunteers to investigate the sexual arousal of both men and women have been conducted. Many have suggested that women are, on average, physiologically aroused – as in, showing physical changes in their bodies indicating attraction – to both male and female sexual stimuli. The same is apparently not true for lesbians as, surprisingly, they are significantly more aroused by their own sex than by the opposite sex.

This new study, led by Dr. Gerulf Rieger from the Department of Psychology at the University of Essex, asked 345 women of varying sexual orientations to watch a series of videos featuring sexual content. At the same time, their biological responses were measured, including their pupil dilation and their genital response (pulse and blood flow).

The subjects were women ranging in age, educational background, and ethnicity. They were asked to place themselves on a sexual spectrum scale, identifying themselves as either “straight,” “mostly straight,” “bisexual leaning straight,” “bisexual,” “bisexual leaning lesbian,” “mostly lesbian,” or “lesbian.”

The results indeed found that women who identified as heterosexuals were, on average, strongly aroused by videos of both attractive men and women. In contrast to this, self-identified lesbians exhibited a far stronger response to women than men, which the researchers likened to the responses of heterosexual men: both groups show proportional levels of attraction to their self-identified sexual orientation.

A major criticism this paper is likely to receive when it is published is that arousal is not precisely the same as sexual orientation, despite the language of the lead author suggesting so in the media. “Even though the majority of women identify as straight, our research clearly demonstrates that when it comes to what turns them on, they are either bisexual or gay, but never straight,” Dr. Rieger said, as reported by Pink News.

The study notes that, unlike men, a woman’s sexual attraction may be less affected by a partner’s sex and more influenced by cultural and social factors; these factors include relationship history, educational experiences, religious beliefs and cultural assimilation. As a result of this, a woman’s sexual attitude may vary far more than a man’s, and studies such as this one – and others – appear to back this idea up. Hormonal exposure levels from a young age are also cited as a possible explanation for the general variability in responses to sexual stimuli.

It’s a distinctly tricky subject: The authors of the study also mention that “there is considerable variability across sex in physiological sexual arousal to male or female stimuli.” They point out that their research base falls into the Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic – or WEIRD – demographic, and thus their results cannot be accurately applied to the wider populace just yet.

Re: Copy paste summary

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-06 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Copy paste summary

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Copy paste summary

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Copy paste summary

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 03:32 (UTC) - Expand
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-06 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
My thoughts are that this is in large part due to the sexualization of women's bodies in media and culture and does not mean that all women would sleep with or be in a relationship with other women. Seeing the attractiveness in someone or even being turned on does not mean you would actually sleep with them. Some people have been known to be turned on when they are shown images of animals. That doesn't mean anything about their sexuality.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Suspicious of methodology

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I think there's probably a good argument for most humans getting sexually aroused by sexual pictures of other humans, no matter the gender. I think that's different, though, then randomly being attracted to someone in the street. I think it's misleading to call someone "not heterosexual" because a sexual picture of a woman aroused them. If in real life scenarios you never or almost never feel attraction toward women, you're not bisexual.

But I do think human sexuality is probably a lot more fluid than most of us understand, in the right circumstances, or with the right mindset. Labels just box people unnecessarily.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
There's a really easy answer to this: if shown pics of women, probably women picture themselves in place of the woman

Show a dude a video of a dude really really enjoying a blowjob and there's bound to be response even if the person doing the blowing is male

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I will have to disagree here.

The thought of touching another woman's vagina or even boobs is revolting to me.

I can aesthetically appreciate a beautiful woman (and be jealous of her looks too) but I just don't want to be touched by another woman in a sexual manner or touch another woman in a sexual manner. At all.

I think lesbian couples are adorable. But the thought of inserting myself into that mix is pretty revolting to me.

I have a hard time watching straight porn because I don't like looking at vaginas too.

I feel kind of bad for writing it out like that because it makes it seem like I find it inherently disgusting or something (and I don't think that). It's just for myself that I'm repulsed.

Women do nothing for me on a sexual level.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
Smart women aren't straight, but I do believe there are some undereducated homophobes too scared to let themselves be anything other than straight.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-11-07 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
okaaaay but

that doesn't make anyone bisexual, it just measures a physiological response...

kinda interesting though

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
can't be true. i would have been able to find a girlfriend by now if it was.
gobbledigook: (Default)

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[personal profile] gobbledigook 2015-11-07 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Most men would probably be "almost never straight" if they were viewed in society the same way women are, I think.

Men just don't receive the same "incentive" to fantasize about other men the way women do with other women, so I think it's fishy to single out biological attraction of an entire gender when it's not entirely defined by biology but also by societal expectations.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2015-11-07 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
1. Sexuality is a complex phenomena that can't be reduced to measuring eye dilation, blood flow, or squishy-part turgidity while watching porn.

2. Speaking of which, why don't these studies deal with the possibility that erotic/pornographic art featuring women is ubiquitous, and response to it might be learned?

3. At least some people who have seen the study in question suggests that it doesn't really say that.
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2015-11-07 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
I don't care what someone thinks about whatever arousal I may or may not get, I m straight and that means I'm not going to fuck another woman.

I find the conclusions of this study very, very questionable.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-08 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Wasn't there already a study that said women respond sexually to viewing sex acts while men respond to the participants in sex acts?

Re: Question Thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
I don't expect an answer, but mine currently is 'How's Dethtoll holding up?' I hope he's okay.

Re: Question Thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking that, too.

Dethtoll, on the off chance you're reading this, we're thinking of you. :( Hang in there, bro.

Re: Question Thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
+2

Re: Question Thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Same here. Hope you're all right, dethtoll.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Question Thread

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-11-07 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
Dad is refusing to make a decision about whether or not to be taken off the ventilator, so he'll likely be getting shipped off to another long-term care place in the meantime. I'm not even sure what the fuck anymore.

I'll be okay though, thanks y'all.

Re: Question Thread

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 05:26 (UTC) - Expand

Cat Hair

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
How do I get cat hair off of a sweatshirt? I brushed off as much as I could with my hands and then tried washing it, but there's still a lot on it.

Re: Cat Hair

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Sticky lint roller applied for 20 minutes, and then you burn the sweater and shave the cat.

Re: Cat Hair

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Cat Hair

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Cat Hair

(Anonymous) - 2015-11-07 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Cat Hair

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad - 2015-11-07 01:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Cat Hair

[personal profile] leisuretime - 2015-11-07 01:30 (UTC) - Expand