case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-17 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3332 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3332 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(David Bowie)


__________________________________________________



03.
(Great British Bake Off for Sports Relief, Ed Balls)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Wars: TFA]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Damian Lewis, Dick Winters, Band Of Brothers]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Daughter of the Lilies]


__________________________________________________



08.
[David Eddings]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Sengoku Basara]


__________________________________________________



10.
[JJBA]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Men In Black I, II, III]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Well, considering he's practically the only character who gets any characterization in BoB I'm not sure I blame you. I think my SO had a mild crush on him in that too lol.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
You don't think Lipton, Nixon, Eugene, Malarky or Buck had any characterization?

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Considering I was still getting their names confused (well, actually maybe not Malarky, he might be a slight exception) by the end of the series, which we binge watched... yes.

Yes, if they're not distinct enough for me to tell them apart by the end, the writers didn't do a good enough job with characterization. I didn't have this problem with The Pacific or Generation Kill.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Or you weren't paying enough attention, maybe? All of those characters are recognizable and name-checked a lot.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, not really. They were name checked, but not that recognizable.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-02-18 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Really? Not even someone like Buck. Like, one of the most distinguishable actors I can think of? Even if you don't know his name you know, "That guy with the (literally) white hair.



The one who starts off as a cocky platoon leader and eventually has a nervous breakdown after seeing his friends killed.
dancing_clown: (Default)

[personal profile] dancing_clown 2016-02-18 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
I've never watched this image in a loop before. And now I feel a little bad that all I see are Neal McDonough's ears popping out of that helmet.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-02-18 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, comfort was not as big of an issue in WWII.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I'll be totally honest... I forgot he existed.

To be fair though, I have seen maybe five or six dozen WWII films. Almost none of the characters managed to have personalities that I hadn't seen in ten other things already... which might be no fault of the writers and more of a fault of the industry. Parts even really seemed like clever homages.

Who knows? Don't get me wrong, I still thought it was a good show. Better than The Pacific, even.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Really? I don't find that at all. I think they did rather well with giving the characters distinct personalities -- especially Nixon, Harry Welsh, Speirs, and Lipton (although I admit it took several rewatches for me to be able to distinguish between all of them).

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Well, maybe if I had watched it more than once I would have been able to tell the characters apart. As it stood with one watching... Winters was/is the only one I can pick out.

If that's what the writers were going for, I can appreciate the kind of storytelling that evokes a sense of chaos and depersonalization of fellow man... but I didn't really get the sense that that's what they meant to do, you know?

Like I said, in TP and GK this was not a problem. The characters were highly distinct.

Not saying I didn't like BoB. It was great. Well produced, incredible cinematography, engaging storyline, good atmosphere... it just sort of failed to make me notice or remember anyone but Winters.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
sa

Maybe that's why I love it so much - there's so many characters and events packed into those 10 hours that with every rewatch I find something (or someone) new that fascinates me.

I think The Pacific and Gen Kill focuses in on smaller groups of characters, so it's easier to remember them. I don't think they were characterised any better than the BoB ones.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-02-18 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
That might be true. I would probably have to rewatch it to see if I agreed with that assessment I don't remember the cast size of core characters being all that disparate, but there were definitely more deaths so maybe it started out that way. What BoB did have going for it was it was a pretty period-accurate representation of that war. It was therefore fairly chaotic. I assumed that was what was behind the differences in characterization.

But then, GK was also pretty damn period accurate lol. In every sense of the hurry up and wait atmosphere of modern combat. That in itself probably contributed to ...well, having more time to watch characters just fuck around.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-02-18 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
We must have watched different shows...