Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-25 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3340 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3340 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Xena: Warrior Princess]
__________________________________________________
02.

[MLP:FIM]
__________________________________________________
03.

[What's My Line?]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[MLP:FIM]
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-25 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)2/10
(Anonymous) 2016-02-25 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I've seen people remark before that they'd probably raise some eyebrows if they were called the Junior Jihadists. Still, the Crusaders are so far back in time that people can get away with sanitizing them, like Vikings or the Shinsengumi. See also: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comicsandcosplay/comics/critical-miss/12024-It-s-Not-Like-I-Reich-You-Or-Anything
op
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Even if we claim that the Crusaders were way back in history, I don't think it's good to erase the fact that Christianity has its own crazy religious-militant past, but even as a reference, it doesn't make sense!
They're not fighting to protect anything, they're not fighting FOR anything! They're searching for something!Conceptually, this should not be a 'crusade' anyway, even for the way 'crusade' is used in other contexts.
if they were called the "Cutie Mark Vikings" it would be stupid too. It's a nonsensical association.
Re: op
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)Crusading, crusaders, etc seeped into colloquial use a long, long, LONG time ago. That's what happens with language. Phrases get absorbed and sanitised. People say things like 'don't be such a grammar nazi' all the time and surely that history is far more recent and relevant to today than the fucking Crusades.
Just... get some perspective for gods sake.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:06 am (UTC)(link)op
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:10 am (UTC)(link)The ponies did not go on anything remotely resembling a military campaign or a holy war.
Re: op
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 01:24 am (UTC)(link)They picked 'crusaders' because it's alliteration you dumbfuck.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Heroes tbqh
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:23 am (UTC)(link)But of course, the Christian literature and propaganda produced in the era, especially stuff by popes condoning the war and destruction of infidels (non-Christians) does outweigh that on the opposite side. The Church was absolutely nuts about the Crusades.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:31 am (UTC)(link)so it still doesn't make sense.
op
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-26 01:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 01:05 am (UTC)(link)No kidding. I think we should be hitting some kind of statute of limitations mark any day now.
On a sidenote, it's interesting to me how there are these conflicting stances in fandom about "language evolves and changes, and therefore I can use this word for what I want" vs "this word once meant this specific thing and therefore cannot or should not ever be used in any other context."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 12:40 am (UTC)(link)ok, sure
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 01:26 am (UTC)(link)language changes. that word doesn't have that connotation to the VAST majority of people anymore.
no subject
op
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 01:49 am (UTC)(link)You could answer that to every fucking secret on this community.
Re: op
Re: op
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-26 07:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 01:47 am (UTC)(link)An old definintion of crusade is the state of being marked [with the cross]. So a crusader is one seeking to be marked.
I get that this is the sort of word with a fair bit of baggage.
While searching one of my top search options for "crusade against" was followed by the word Islam.
However, it's also been used in other ways like The Crusade for Justice, a Mexican-American social movement and The Crusade for Citizenship, whose goal was to educate and register disenfranchised black voters.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 11:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-26 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)