Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-04-23 03:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #3398 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3398 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #486.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)Boy have times changed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)Fucking hell, I hate this puritanical decade.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 01:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 04:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 08:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 13:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)I'm just tired of hearing about John Barrowman himself, though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 22:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 22:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 01:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 04:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 14:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 01:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 23:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)I think it is very much a remnant of Barrowman's theatre acting that he does't shake when he's on camera - the way he talks, the way he holds himself, and the way he emotes feels like he is a cardboard cut-out* that has accidentally landed in the scene, and it can be a bit uncanny valley.
* Not saying his acting is bad, but just imagine a cardboard cut-out that runs through several poses like clunky stop-motion animation, with an unmoving mouth and permanent smile, occasional glower, occasional teary eyes, with a voice-box on the back that spits out lines.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 12:12 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-24 12:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
That said...he looks kinda plastic. Like, he's VERY made up in DW. They caked the makeup on. Add that to the fact he already looks like a doll IRL. It took me a while to warm to him partially because of that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)Other then that, I don't think he's creepy, just hammy, but I feel like he's more a stage/musical actor and that's why.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
The big problem is structural. TW decided, for some reason, to be a police procedural, and put him in charge of the team. Jack's strength as a character is being an unpredictable, rogueish wildcard. The person in charge in a procedural by nature has to be pretty boring and reliable (a few shows, like Luther, go off this model, but those are more prestige drama and less genre fiction). So they didn't know what to do with his character.
Teal Deer: Depending on why you find him creepy, you might find him less creepy on TW. But eh, it's not that good, there are better things to watch.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)You really can't judge Jack from Torchwood by his actions in Doctor Who.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-23 22:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-23 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-24 00:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject