Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-19 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #3424 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3424 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)(Also, what makes it absurd to you that "La face with an Oakland booty" wouldn't be okay for white people to say? Like I said in the thread yesterday, it's not like you can pretend that "Oakland booty" is a phrase that has nothing to do with racial politics)
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 06:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 06:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
“I don’t think she’d wear that dress if she thought that booty is horrible — and to me, it ain’t horrible,” the hip-hop entertainer told the New York Daily News on Thursday, May 19. “I don’t get it at all. She’s saying she’s proud of her butt. I’m glad she embraced the look, because that’s what I wanted (with the song).”
He continued, “All I would say to the critics is let’s better understand the context of what she said. If [what she’s] saying is, ‘I have this butt that Mix-a-Lot was talking about in ‘Baby Got Back,’’ that’s a good thing. She’s saying I’ve embraced this ideal of beautiful. However, if what she’s saying is, ‘I cannot believe I got this fat, this is horrible,’ then I agree with the critics.”
“I’m glad she didn’t pull it down,” he said. “I don’t think she should.”
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) 2016-05-19 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)I don't really agree with him (for one thing, it seems like he's addressing the song in general, not the specific line; for another thing, I mean, no offense to Sir Mix-a-Lot but I think he might not be entirely the most perceptive analyst of contemporary cultural politics). But good for him, I guess.
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 12:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 00:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
It's his work, and it's his feelings on it that matter. Nobody else gets to decide that for him. Particularly not armchair cultural politicians.
Re: Sir Mix-a-Lot disagrees
Re: LA face with an Oakland booty
(Anonymous) 2016-05-20 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)