Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-07-20 06:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3486 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3486 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Maya Rudolph & Martin Short]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Hamilton/South Park]
__________________________________________________
04.

[John Spencer]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Sliders]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Daniel Radcliffe]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Dune]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Assassin's Creed Syndicate]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Mulberry]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13. [tb]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #498.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:13 am (UTC)(link)Also he was wrong about this cunning trick one several other levels, but just the idea that a person can lie to the tax office if there's a 'loophole'... if you sign a legal declaration that you're not lying, you should probably try NOT TO LIE.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Those sorts of dumbasses need to be smacked upside the head. Hard.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 00:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 14:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
"These are undeniable facts, dad, this is reality!"
"just because it's reality doesn't make it true"
(phone conversation didn't last long after that)
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 01:03 am (UTC)(link)I'm pretty sure he knew it was a country and just wanted to argue, but I have no actual proof of that.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 01:52 am (UTC)(link)"The A for 'ally' in LGBTQA is to provide cover for LGBT people coming out of the closet."
No dipshit, it's because we're in a political coalition with straight allies, some of whom stepped up to change laws, raise funds, raise awareness, create supportive spaces, and provided services for HIV+ people at a time we needed them. Sometimes it's important to include them, other times its less important.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 09:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 10:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 13:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 13:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 15:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 14:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 20:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 02:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 03:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
The thing with the two big Aussie political parties is that the Coalition (which is the combination of the Liberal Party and the National Party) is the party who try to cut down on public works and social support allowances to save money, while the Labour Party try to get public works done and try to support the lower income parts of society. If there is not a regular trade-off, Labour will spend too much, and the Libs will let everything fall into ruin because they won't put the money out to fix it.
I also wonder about his claim that people hated Malcom Turnbull's ousting of Tony Abbott, because frankly the Libs would have lost the election with Abbott in charge, plus I think Labour supporters were glad to get rid of Abbott. I for one may have wished Turnbull didn't get back as PM, but he's better than Abbott.
Dad is also a bit of a climate change denier, but he tends be of the stance that current climate change is a natural occurrence, not exacerbated by human-caused pollution, which I think is a rather stupid line of thinking in reflect to our religious beliefs, which state that humans are gradually getting worse.
The worst from him however tends to be the personal stuff, like saying that Mum did stuff while they were married that were really things he, or his family did (and frankly his mother and sister were not the best of in-laws to Mum).
The sad thing is, he still wants to think there's a chance he and Mum could get back together, but Mum has become ferociously independent since their divorce, so she will never consider such a thing.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
When I was thirteen I told my mom I felt a lump in my chest and my aunt said "it might be cancer". Cue me breaking the waterworks but nope, turns out I was just starting to develop my chest.
And from the aunt who brought you the "it might be cancer" when my boobies started to grow, I bring you:
"you shouldn't let the dog sleep with you because dogs can give you herpes"!
Nowadays I laugh it off because honestly.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 08:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 06:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 09:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 16:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 08:36 am (UTC)(link)But one of the most memorable instances was a friend of my parents, who basically tried to push his very flawed and incorrect knowledge of Japanese history on me the very day after I had just (successfully) written a huge exam about that very topic at uni (which he was aware of). And he was a guest so I couldn't be rude but damn, it annoyed me so much.
Re: People Who Claim They are Right about Things They Know Nothing About
(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)For some reason, she decided that I was wrong, and some landmark I had mentioned (that I passed literally every week day morning on my way to the lectures) wasn't actually where I claimed it to be, but on a completely different side of the building, and therefore I had to be wrong about the hall's location, too.
Unsurprisingly, she ended up being late. The lecture hall in question was exactly wher I had instructed.