Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-01-30 06:10 pm
[ SECRET POST #3680 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3680 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Versailles]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Mad Max: Fury Road]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Star Trek: The Next Generation]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Shannara]
__________________________________________________
07.

[A Series of Unfortunate Events]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Spyro]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #526.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-30 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-30 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 01:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 01:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 04:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 05:22 am (UTC)(link)(links go to a couple of the artist's pictures - no nudity, but potential pedophilia/hebephilia implied)
http://pm1.narvii.com/5859/385c5cec1768dafc5412d3b539048e7d608e0084_hq.jpg
http://pm1.narvii.com/5859/cee0e2e63b126bc9062a7666a1dd132949b00b0d_hq.jpg
They are/were a very popular and prolific artist within the fandom (and quite skilled too).
Personally, I've never enjoyed the dynamic that is portrayed between Sherlock and John in this artist's fanart. And that one piece that's some kind of Pokemon fusion is definitely very squicky to me, in a major way. That said, I always thought the way that small but vocal group of johnlockers went after the artist was messed up and wrong.
It's also worth noting that in retaliation against this small but vocal group of johnlockers, a small but vocal group of opposing johnlockers decided to spread the word that fawnlock (an AU popular among the former group) was actually pedophilic. They did this in an attempt to prove that the former group were all huge hypocrites. However, fawnlock was never about characterizing Sherlock as a child or an infant; in the majority of fawnlock he was characterized as fully grown - something which the opposing johnlockers probably knew, despite their claims otherwise.
TLDR: it was messy, and pedophilia accusations were a part of it, though it was only ever a small but vocal minority that were involved.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-30 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)I'm pretty sure there was some My Little Pony "The characters don't have official ages that makes them all pedo unless proven otherwise" wank.
The Clone Wars all the clones are technically like 9 so all clone pairings are pedo.
I can't think of a single fandom without pedo being thrown around like fictional mardis gras beads
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 12:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-31 01:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 01:45 am (UTC)(link)Thank you for being the voice of reason in this thread.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-31 01:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-31 17:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-02-01 00:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-01-31 03:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 12:22 am (UTC)(link)I feel that pedophile-accusations within fandoms are based more on people who feel like they are not in control of their own lives (which i do admit, is usually the case for csa victims, but for others they may just be depressed and feel powerless), and will leap at the chance to belittle someone else/give them self a brownie point for saying "you're a pedophile" over a fictional ship to feel good about themselves, rather than actually disliking a ship and giving actual reasons for it. Not that I've shipped ereri but I haven't given people shit for it either. These kinds of ship wars tend to be based on more malicious accusations rather than "you have shit taste" which takes away the fun of having a good argument over two ships at all.
If it's not pedophilia accusations it will be something else that is just as "bad" or "problematic" or "disgusting" and people will jump on the bandwagon to feel good about themselves, even those who were never involved in any of it at all.
Basically, any anime fandom because I've noticed a pattern that's where a lot of powerless individuals are (who feel they lack control over their own lives or anyone) will jump at the chance to have some kind of power over someone else. Even if it's shipping in a vacuum that is tumblr (which for depressed people's tends to practically become their second home). I feel the more stable the users are on there, the more they are like "This isn't real, guys. It's fiction." And move onto thinking about actual issues in their real life and how they can solve them lol.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 12:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 12:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 01:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 02:14 am (UTC)(link)The notion that what people ship or don't ship says things about their personal moral character has become a very pervasive one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)Roadhog (48) and Junkrat (25) have gotten it. Reaper (50+) and Mcree shippers (38) have gotten it. Anyone who ships DVA (19) gets it.
It's really bizarre because you get people crying about child porn and pedophilia about characters who are in their fucking 30s.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)