case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-03-30 04:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #815 ]


⌈ Secret Post #815 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.
[Weird Al Yankovic and Stephen Colbert]


__________________________________________________



102. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.
[Yu-Gi-Oh]


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



108.
[Rachael Maddow]


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.
[The Office]


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.
[Phantom of the Opera]


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.
[previously linked wrong]


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.
[hunter s. thompson]


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.
[Hotel Babylon]


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



138.
[jake hurwitz]


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.
[but why not the men?]


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.
[Naruto]


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.
[Naruto]


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.
[Jade Goody]


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.
[previously linked wrong]


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.
[High School Musical]



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 11 pages, 275 secrets from Secret Submission Post #116.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - doing it wrong ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (love you bitch)

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-30 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
125 As someone else with similar feelings, it's not about kicking ass. A lot of ass kicking female characters are created as shounen fanservice anyway. It's about whether or not the character exists for herself and is self-directed. "Love interest" characters are frequently created by writers using the following process: "what traits should the girl for character X have?", "cast an actress between 18 and 25 who is 'hott'", "don't give her any personality traits that will alienate our male 18-35 demographic", "ok, we're done".

That's not a character, that's a plot coupon. The male hero solves so many mysteries, or kicks x amount of ass, and he gets one of those as a reward. Or worse, the writers turn an existing female character who used to have a personality into one for him. Then "fandom feminists" start running off at the mouth about how women who don't like these characters OBVIOUSLY hate their vaginas.

[identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Wow - are you me?

(Anonymous) 2009-03-31 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
That is, pretty much, exactly it. Of course, there will be some characters who do have their own stories and so on who I don't like but that'll be cause, well, I don't like all male characters with their own stories either. Not the biggest fan of Archer, he's a bit of a prat actually. And annoying as all get out at times.

But yes, that is pretty much exactly it.

[identity profile] musical-emjay.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Ho'shit, you just took the words right out of my mouth.

Also, I feel as though I should add that these "plot coupons" instantly become "invalid" as soon as the male hero decides he doesn't want to fuck them. Because god knows, female characters are only relevant or powerful or interesting when they act as fuck-holes for the men. Once that option is gone, they should just die or disappear, because it would be too much effort to write them as PEOPLE first and ~SEXY VAGINAS~ second.

[identity profile] jlh.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
I'm really sorry—I seem to have wandered into an ongoing argument that I have nothing to do with. I should have emphasized that I don't like action/adventure shows full stop; that I don't think of DS9 as such a show; that I misread the secret and thought the Candice Bergen picture was from Boston Legal; and that I don't know who these fandom feminists are, but I don't think there's anything wrong with liking Lily and Robin from HIMYM even though most of what that show is concerned with is relationships. Hopefully that doesn't make them "plot coupons" or "love interests"; I would argue that they have other things going on, and that there isn't really a male hero. I mean, I'd argue that about the women on Friends or any number of other shows, but I'm not sure I'd win that argument, because I'm not sure what the terms are.

So, in short, sorry.

[identity profile] musical-emjay.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
Errm, I wasn't actually responding to you in particular, just agreeing with [livejournal.com profile] ataniell93's comment, but I'm sorry if you feel unduly attacked :/ *wince*

I don't watch HIMYM, so I can't speak authoritatively about Lily and Robin, but from what I can tell they seem to be fully fleshed characters, and fully fleshed people in their own right, which is all that I really ask for in a female character, whether she be a kick-ass-take-names type or not. The problem for me is when female characters get inserted into a show for the sole purpose of being the "love interest" or the "sexy foil" to the main male character, which is an issue that runs rampant in a lot of action/adventure/sci-fi shows. So, for me, that's where I draw the line.

I will admit though that the OP is a little unclear, so I don't think you should have to apologize for walking into this discussion a little confused.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (dead!jess)

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-31 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there's a difference if the whole show is about relationships. I kind of hate romantic comedies and sitcoms, but if the male characters and female characters are equally well fleshed out and equally relationship oriented, then nobody is a "love interest".

I also don't think there's anything wrong with liking any character. It's when you hate on other real life flesh and blood women and imply that they hate other real life flesh and blood women and hate their own bodies because they don't like the female characters that you like, or because they prefer slash to het, that I get pissed off and judge you :) You can like women as people in the real world perfectly fine and still be annoyed with the thinly characterised females on some shows or have a kink for gay porn. (IME gals who only like slash regardless of the fandom are usually reading fanfic to get off and are just like the guys who only watch lesbian porn, but nobody says they hate their penises. I do like het, but I generally dislike *canon* het because in most of my geek-oriented fandoms the women are written as Love Interests first, characters second, and are definitely 'supporting cast' if not outright 'plot coupons'.)
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (always coming home to you)

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-31 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I often feel like the only person in SPN fandom who is bitter about Jo not because I wanted her to get with Dean (ew, no thanks) but because they took her away just as she was getting interesting, growing up and developing a personality of her own instead of trying to be Dean with tits. In my personal canon, she realised sometime after Sam and she had that close encounter of the creepy kind that she didn't want to date a Winchester, she wanted to BE one, and shortly after that, she started dating girls :) I want her back, but not for Dean, for her own bad self. And I want Ellen and Missouri back, but of course they're not 'hot' enough for the CW. Despite the fact that I ship John/Missouri like FedEx.

But I like Wincest, so clearly all my complaints about casting and writing of females in SPN must be dismissed because I'm terrified my OTP won't happen. As if I am dumb enough to seriously think they'll do that on primetime network TV. Though in my opinion they came damn close. Very telling when the demon who wanted to seduce Dean away from Sam took the form of a guy, not a girl, and attacked his relationship with Sam, after attacking the love relationships of its earlier victims...things that make you go HMMM....

[identity profile] musical-emjay.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahahaha, "things that make you go HMMM" indeed ;D

Ugh, I'm so with you on Jo! I did not buy the "romantic tension" between her and Dean in the LEAST, so I definitely didn't want that to happen, but COME ON, SPN WRITERS! She could have been an awesome character! If they actually seriously CARED about having good female characters on their show, they wouldn't have dropped her like a hot potato as soon as her and Dean fucking was no longer on the table. They would have pulled up their big boy/big girl pants, admitted that the whole "love interest" thing was a wash, and then written her as a PERSON, someone who has a desire to hunt and be successful at it, who has a desire to follow in her father's footsteps and save people just as much as Sam and Dean do. She could have been the most awesome pseudo-sister character, or a badass competent ALLY character, but nope, oops, she's a GIRL! And we don't know how to write ~girl characters~ unless they're somehow sexually involved with our lead male, or are HOPING to be sexually involved. Because girls don't have any wants or talents or agency outside of being in a relationship with a man, silly goose!

(See also: my raaaaaage about the Sam and Ruby relationship being so heavily sexualized. Way to fucking drop the ball on that one, SPN writers >:/)

And hot damn, what I wouldn't give for Ellen or Missouri to show up again. GIVE THEM TO MEEEE.

[identity profile] jlh.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
I think that the OP needed to make a few things clearer:

1) That they meant only shows that are male-targeted action shows. I really don't think of DS9 as a show like that, and I guess that photo of Candice Bergen isn't from Boston Legal, eh?

What I said about kicking ass—I don't care for male-targeted action shows. I do like, say, Robin and Lily on HIMYM, and I'm not sure where they would exist on the continuum you've talked about here. Robin was a "love interest" at one time, but is also a lot of other things; Lily's a friend. I'm not even sure Ted counts as the "hero."

If you sense frustration, yeah, I'm frustrated that every time people talk about female characters, they talk about them ONLY in the context of these kinds of shows, of shounen shows whether they're manga or not. I'll take your word for it that apparently they fall into one of two categories. In other shows, especially ones that don't have this male hero, that isn't the case. Those are the shows I watch; those are the female characters I like.

2) Who are these fandom feminists so often referred to? I don't think they're fandom-wide. There's no one in Idolfandom or HIMYM fandom beseeching me to like the ladies. And I don't remember that term floating around back in the day in HP, either.

[identity profile] riviyan-questa.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think of DS9 as a male-targeted action show either. I think most of the viewers were female, actually. At least, most of the fans of DS9 that I know are female. And it was a lot less about the action (compared to other Star Treks), and more about the characters and politics. There is the action-y episodes, too, and I like them, but I prefer character and plot-centric stories.

I think you said it best in your comment, too, that there are female characters with their own stories that you don't like, but that there are men with their own stories that you don't like, too. That is pretty much exactly how I feel. A character's gender doesn't really have an impact on whether or not I like them.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (american beauty)

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-31 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I think jlh was looking at that secret and seeing "male-targeted"; I looked at that secret and saw "geek-targeted".

[identity profile] riviyan-questa.livejournal.com 2009-04-01 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah so did I... I guess some people still think that 'male-targeted' and 'geek-targeted' are the same thing, so I can see how it would be misread.
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (american beauty)

part 1

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-31 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
1) You can only talk about what you know. I would guess that like me, the OP would consider watching a sitcom if there were a gun pointed at her head, maybe. (OK, I like Weeds--but it's about drug dealers in the suburbs.) Boston Legal and DS9 are not male-targeted action shows, but many people who primarily enjoy cop shows do also like Boston Legal and DS9 is science fiction. I have no clue how to answer your comment about HIMYM because I don't watch shows like that and if I had made this secret I wouldn't have been thinking of it either. I watch science fiction, House (which is practically SF given the outre medicine in it), fantasy/horror like Supernatural, and some of the geekier crime shows like Numb3rs. I don't think of these shows as "male-targeted action shows", I think of them as "geek-targeted shows", and I tend not to enjoy "normal-people-targeted shows" about people who live in the here and now and have normal, everyday problems. That's what I see in the OP's secret. I have no idea what the writing is like on shows about people who live in the here and now and have normal, everyday problems because the only shows like that I watch are...no, actually, nobody on Weeds or Profit has normal, everyday problems. *shrug*. If I want normal, I don't have to turn on the TV, you know?

Fandom is primarily oriented toward geeky shows because most of us are geeks. I'm always surprised that shows about people who live in the here and now and have normal, everyday problems even have a fandom, so I'm not surprised that you're frustrated, but it's not because we only like male-targeted shows. Supernatural is becoming more and more female-targeted now that the CW has realised who actually watches it. Moonlight, True Blood and the like are female-targeted. Xena and Buffy (neither of which were my thing particularly, but that's because I am not so fond of bad mythology--I can barely tolerate some of the Supernatural myth-fail) were female-targeted.

2) You're in Idolfandom and HIMYM fandom. Those are definitely shows I think of as shows that people who are not geeks watch. If you were in Supernatural fandom, I guarantee you would be sick to death of these people unless you were one of them--they are always ripping on people who don't like it that the CW casts girls for this show on hotness and tends to drop them if they don't have chemistry with the male leads, and people who enjoy the older female characters that occasionally show up and the male recurring characters more than they enjoy the 18-35 eye candy. Also, many of them only want to hear about your love for poor lost Jo if you agree with them that she should be shipped with Dean because what a lot of them really are is frustrated het-shippers who are annoyed that slash is more popular in the fandom. I am a feminist. I put the quotes around "fandom feminists" because I don't think these people are really all that feminist--they care more about the respect fictional characters get (despite being plot coupons) than they care about respecting the other women who are in the fandom with them. You're also not in bandom, where there are all these huge arguments about musicians' wives and girlfriends that I don't even pay attention to because I don't care. Unless they are making the music, they're not relevant to me. (I got in so much trouble in SPN fandom for saying that about the girlfriend of one of the actors who was in one episode playing a bit part--I didn't care about their breakup or why they broke up because she has no more to do with SPN than the actor who played Random Redshirt 12 in episode 73 has to do with Star Trek.)

cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (Bite me Slytherfanatics)

part 2

[personal profile] cleverthylacine 2009-03-31 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know what side of HP fandom you were on, but there was a lot of "support all female characters regardless of how badly written they are" after Book 6. There was a whole lot of this garbage coming out of the sore-winner side who couldn't handle it that everybody who liked the Slytherins or shipped something that wasn't OBHWF didn't line up to lick their e-peen for correctly guessing Jo's intentions after book 6 came out; if you were disappointed that Ginny hadn't actually got over her sixth-grade crush and grown up, but was rather only using the boys who liked her to pretend disinterest until Harry got a clue, or if you thought Hermione shouldn't be dating someone whose behaviour provoked her to committing violent acts and dating dangerous losers, you were slut-shaming and hated your vag. Also, if you thought it was lame that a kickass character like Tonks was reduced to listless incompetence because she couldn't get a particular man to notice her (and then knocked up and killed off in the subsequent book) clearly you were a delusional Remus/Sirius shipper who just couldn't handle not getting your pairing and who didn't understand that women have the right to Be Women (sorry, I don't define the right to Be A Woman as the right to lose my edge in wartime because I can't get a date with the guy I want). I had all three of those unacceptable thoughts so I heard a lot of this crap.

So yeah, it's there in HP, but if you are a big fan of Books 6 and 7 you probably never noticed it because it wasn't directed in your general direction.