fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #1583 ]

[ SECRET POST #1583 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1583 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

__________________________________________________

18.

__________________________________________________

19.

__________________________________________________

20.

__________________________________________________

21.

__________________________________________________

22.

__________________________________________________

23.

__________________________________________________

24.

__________________________________________________

25.

__________________________________________________

26.

__________________________________________________

27.

__________________________________________________

28.

__________________________________________________

29. [troll]

__________________________________________________

30.

__________________________________________________

31.

__________________________________________________

32.

__________________________________________________

33.

__________________________________________________

34.

__________________________________________________

35.

__________________________________________________

36.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 83 secrets from Secret Submission Post #226.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 - too big ], [ 0 - hit/ship/spiration ], [ 0 - omgiknowthem ], [ 0 - take it to comments ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

What I meant was simply that River (and her secrets) is a major plot point this season, just as the Master was for those episodes.

Except.. the Master wasn't right there the whole season, annoying the hell out of the viewers. He wasn't on the TARDIS, in your face, being obnoxious.

Then again, I'm pretty sure Moffat wouldn't know subtlety if it hit him over the head with a sledgehammer, so I'm not shocked he doesn't recognize the importance of the concept.

Wait, wait, are you trying to imply that RTD knew how to be subtle? Because that's the funniest thing I've heard all day.

+1000 this = so true and funny! Thank you anon!

He at least knew how to drop a hint without shoving it in your freaking face every ten seconds ~~unlike Moffat~~.

That's, uh, rather debatable. On both sides.

I think both of them balanced each other, and one without the other lacks something, which is why S5 is so meh and Sherlock is eh.

Well I was just referring to people being annoyed that she's in the spotlight all the time this season, not the fact that people just don't like her character. I was just saying that she's in the spotlight cuz she has to be.

Then again, I'm pretty sure Moffat wouldn't know subtlety if it hit him over the head with a sledgehammer, so I'm not shocked he doesn't recognize the importance of the concept.

LOL He's become a teller, not a show-er since he took over. It's a big part of my issues with him.

Except that she doesn't have to be; Moffat decided to make her be. And again, the Master didn't have the spotlight the entire season when he was on -- at least, not directly; he was occasionally referenced, but only the final three episodes actually featured him, and as

fenm pointed out, the Master is an established character, and so focusing on him isn't as irksome.

River, on the other hand, will be around, being obnoxious and in the viewer's faces, all season. That's a hell of a lot more spotlight than the Master ever got in series 3.

And yeah, agreed on Moffat. Oh my god I hate his storytelling, though. I can't even describe how much. I don't think the man has an original thought in his head, honestly-- everything he does is a rehash of something else! :\

Well he decided to make her that when he decided to make her such a big part of the Doctor's life. The Master wasn't possibly the Doctor's wife/baby-momma/girlfriend/someone obviously super important in his future. Just by being that, River became something bigger than the Master was in a certain way.

It's funny because he wrote my fave eps (The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances) but I have SO many issues with him now that he's taken over.

I see you are new to all the people who assume the Master was Susan's other grandfather.

Really? I've never heard that lol.

The Master was super-important in the Doctor's future by virtue of having been important in his past. River... River came out of nowhere, isn't (to our knowledge) an established character, and we're expected to care about an entire series-long story arc about her, like her, and tolerate her being in our faces for a whole series because... why? Because Moffat said so? No, thanks. I don't buy it. Moffat saying "she's really important guys YOU'LL SEE" doesn't justify making it all about her.

I loved TEC/TDD so hard. Everything else he's written for the series has been such samey crap though. Ugh. And especially now that he's showrunner. I seriously don't know if I'll keep watching the show anymore... I managed through series 5 mostly running just on the fact that I really like Eleven, but a whole series of River Song and all of Moffat's writing flaws? Might have to count me out. :\

River came out of nowhere, isn't (to our knowledge) an established character, and we're expected to care about an entire series-long story arc about her, like her, and tolerate her being in our faces for a whole series because... why? Because Moffat said so?

Um...pretty much yea. It's his show lol. You have to watch what he puts on it if you're gonna watch. Or you can not watch. (I don't even mean that in a snarky way. That's just how TV shows (that you don't write yourself) work).

Moffat saying "she's really important guys YOU'LL SEE" doesn't justify making it all about her.

This was Amy for most of season 5. And I didn't like it. I still don't lol. (Even though I'm coming around to her character)

I loved TEC/TDD so hard. Everything else he's written for the series has been such samey crap though. Ugh. And especially now that he's showrunner. I seriously don't know if I'll keep watching the show anymore... I managed through series 5 mostly running just on the fact that I really like Eleven, but a whole series of River Song and all of Moffat's writing flaws? Might have to count me out. :\

I think the big issue is that Moff is a teller and not a shower. He hammers you over the head with the importance and brilliance of characters instead of letting them show you themselves. I find it more tolerable with River because at least we know she's clever and she can wield a gun like no other and hold her own against the Doctor and aliens.

Yeah, I know it's his show, but that doesn't mean I have to like it, lol. And this goes along with what we're saying, too, about Moffat being a teller and not a shower -- I don't see any reason to give one single fuck about River Song, especially not enough to want to see a whole season of her! He hasn't given me a reason to care, whereas the Master was both a compelling villain and one with a history that made me care enough to want to see his story.

I hate Amy, so using her as an example is sooo not a good idea, lol. I can't stand her. Or Rory. ...actually, Moffat has yet to write a companion or major character I do like except for whatsisname, Mark Sheppard's character, and that might just have been because I effing love Mark Sheppard.

That is some of his issue. But it's not all of it -- my biggest problem with him is sheer lack of originality, as I mentioned. All of his plots are recycled. I mentioned to my aunt the other day, "He's trying to make every episode of Doctor Who into the same tired, cliche horror movie, and it's not working, it's not even scary, let alone a good story!" He uses the same tropes in every episode. And series 5 was basically all about him stealing elements of RTD's episodes in some horrible attempt to "one up" RTD's seasons (I did a whole writeup on this and all the things he stole, but I don't feel like going to find it). Ostensibly basing River off of The Time-Traveler's Wife, the constant re-use of the "you can't see it so it's scary" trope, the endless lineup of "creepy" small children... I think everything he does he's done before.

And that's before you even get into his views on men, women, sex and romance. UGH.

And series 5 was basically all about him stealing elements of RTD's episodes in some horrible attempt to "one up" RTD's seasons (I did a whole writeup on this and all the things he stole, but I don't feel like going to find it).

Can we just talk about how Amy started off as a shit remake of Donna? Seriously.

Oh god, SERIOUSLY. She did!

I seriously think Moffat resents the hell out of the fact that anyone else has ever written for DW, and it shows in his writing. He outright steals from and attempts to "one up" the episodes/characters/events of seasons he wasn't show-runner during, and when he was writing for DW under RTD, he sidelined and ignored the characters he didn't create (Rose, for example). And now that he is showrunner, he merrily ignores any characters, events, or history that he didn't write, as if he can just pretend this is the very first Doctor and he wouldn't have any attachments or contacts with, say, prior companions, or anything.

It's really kind of infuriating, that he's taking a show with such a rich history and boiling it down until all that's left is what he's created. It's disgusting, tbh.

he's taking a show with such a rich history and boiling it down until all that's left is what he's created.

I think you really hit the nail on the head here, for why I don't like Eleven so much. With Nine and Ten, even though I've barely watched any of the old Who, I still felt like they were part of something bigger. Now I'm not getting that feeling so much any more...
Though I really don't know enough about DW in all its seasons to know if my complaint is justified =/

I feel much the same. I love Eleven's personality, and who is as a character I do like for the most part, but... his story, his seasons thus far are so far disconnected from the Doctor Who canon that I don't even feel like I'm watching the same show anymore. There's no connection to Old Who or even the rest of New Who -- Moffat ignores all of that vast history simply because he can't stomach that someone else wrote it.

Having seen a bit of Old Who, and having it on good authority from someone who's seen a lot more that my intuition is right here, I'd say your complaint is definitely justified. I'm not even really a big fan of Old Who (I'm one of those insufferable people who finds it hard to watch older television shows seriously), but I squeed when RTD referenced back to aliens, events and such from Old Who that weren't Daleks and Cybermen; I squeed and loved it when he brought Sarah Jane Smith onto the show. I especially loved that his series' referenced back to each other and had a canon continuity -- Martha showing up and being a big part of The Sontaran Stratagem two-parter, Mickey coming back in the Army of Ghosts two-parter, and so on.

Moffat's series don't do that. At all. They simply pretend the show before Moffat never existed, and not only does it give a sense of disconnect that jars me out of enjoying the show and spoils a lot of its feel, but it feels out of tone and out of character for the Doctor, even in a new regeneration, to never even think of his past companions. I don't find that believable for the character, especially in New Who, where his connections to his companions have been so deep and lasting.

But Moffat doesn't like to think about other people having "tainted" his Doctor Who, and he hates to write characters that he himself didn't create, so... there you have it. A Doctor Who without the rich history that makes it Doctor Who.

OMG, Sarah Jane Smith. She was one of the people I had a total "huh?" moment over, because I didn't know who she was before - but I liked the feeling of the Doctor having a previous history, and Sarah Jane was so awesome.

And yeah, I loved the inner-continuity. Even characters I liked a bit less, I was super happy whenever they came back for cameos in other episodes. IMO, it really gave you the feel of 'time'. Just because the Doctor isn't somewhere, doesn't mean life doesn't go on.

I think there was one moment where Eleven vaguely referenced the occurrences of the previous season... but it didn't really go anywhere. Maybe that's another reason River annoys me a bit - she's one of the few vestiges from the previous season, and nobody else gets to come back.

It sounds a bit like maybe Moffat should reconsider writing for a shared canon =/ though iirc, his episodes before Eleven were pretty good.

I loved Sarah Jane from like, the minute she came on screen. I didn't know her, but my best friend (whom I watched it with) did, and she was sure to inform me who she was and how cool she was before we watched, and she completely lived up to it. Having now seen some of her Old Who eps, I love her even more. Sarah Jane Smith is amazing. (RIP Elisabeth Sladen. ♥ )

Exactly! That's exactly it-- and sometimes even if it's a character you didn't like much the first time, they come back ten times more awesome, and it's just great to see. I didn't like Martha much in series three, but you better believe I fangirled her hardcore after the Sontaran Stratagem two-parter! The continuity thing, the way the world keeps turning even after the Doctor's gone... I feel like that's been a major theme of New Who through series four, and I'm sorely upset that Moffat broke that off so completely when he took over.

Yeah, it basically doesn't happen. And the thing is... River only gets to come back because Moffat ensured, through how he ended the Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead two-parter, that River would be his alone and no one else could write for her. She was "untouched" by RTD or other writers, so she was allowed to come back.

Yeah, Moffat should never have written for a shared canon at all. He doesn't do it well.

As far as his episodes before Eleven, I really can't stand any of them but The Empty Child / The Doctor Dances two-parter. This artlce (http://io9.com/#!5022250/why-steven-moffat-isnt-all-that) pretty clearly illustrates some of the problems with his RTD-era episodes. Suffice to say the massive plotholes, sexualization of the Doctor, sidelining of current companions, and so on really got to me.

Martha is the perfect example for me too! During her run, I was a bit ambivalent about her (I liked Rose more, and then OMG Donna). But when she came back later, I was all over that XD I loved what she made of herself.
Same with Mickey! I was so happy that he didn't stay the jilted boyfriend, but kept living and changed and became awesome.

Also, I liked that Rose had a history - true, we didn't get bales of episodes about her friends and whatnot, but we got to see her connection with her mother and how everything affected that. Amy seems a bit of a standalone, for me. Where's her previous life, huh?

That article really is interesting, thanks for the link! I liked TEC/TDD and Blink, but the other episodes I wasn't such a huge fan of. Though, I didn't really pay too much attention to who wrote which episode.

(no subject)

curseangel.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

ketita.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

murderershair.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 05:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

0o0f.livejournal.com - 2011-05-06 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

I feel you on the disconnect (it's one of the reasons I don't connect with Eleven-era Who so well even when I adore the writing), but I'm baffled as to where you're getting that view of Moffat's attitude. Moff's a fanboy. He knows Who canon back to front and adores it, and he's always the first to jump in and defend RTD's writing when someone tries to pit them against each other. He was also under pressure to establish himself as head writer of a franchise that'd been RTD's brainchild ever since the reboot. If anything, I think the lack of references to previous continuity is him overcompensating and clamping down way too hard on his fanboy tendencies, trying to win over the non-niche general audiences who (he thinks) want new/original adventures rather than in-jokes and rehashes of RTD.

I'm not trying to claim the balance of new to old isn't off, because it is. I'm just not convinced the motives behind it are anything so sinister.

To me, it's always felt like he was competing with RTD here. It's always come off to me as though Moffat just despises anything he hasn't personally written for the series -- the way he sidelined current companions when he wrote during RTD's era, the way he refuses to reference anything from RTD's era now that he's showrunner (let alone Old Who), and so on. Perhaps I'm reading it wrong, but you can't deny his obvious distaste for Rose in the episodes he wrote when she was on the show... and he sidelines Martha in much the same way in "Blink" (it's impressive, really, how he managed to noticeably sideline the Doctor's companion in a Doctor-lite episode).

A large part of series five consisted of Moffat basically "one-upping" things that RTD had already done, stealing directly from RTD's work in a lot of ways. Part of this is just that Moffat is obviously not an original writer - I literally have never seen the man do anything honestly original. Part of it is that I think he wanted to establish his Doctor as "better," his companion as "better," and so on.

It came off to me as nasty. I don't follow the interviews, so I don't know what he's said really (other than his vile sexist and misogynist comments I've seen), but the way it came off in the show was particularly... nasty to me. As though he simply couldn't stand anyone else writing for the show and so he had to shun everything that came before him.

Compete? No. Set himself apart? Yes, undoubtedly, lest he leave himself open to accusations of being a copycat or a pale imitation or what-have-you. And while he did tend to work in a slightly different frame of reference from the other writers during RTD's tenure, I don't see how that translates to despising anything. Honestly, the only despising I can see is the way you apparently detest Moffat on a visceral level, and while it's fair to not like his stuff or feel like he gets too wrapped up in his own cleverness, it seems a bit weird to hate him so much that you read hatred into his motives.

(no subject)

wldcatsprstr-14.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 11:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

curseangel.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 16:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

wldcatsprstr-14.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 16:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

curseangel.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 16:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

wldcatsprstr-14.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 16:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

curseangel.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

chibisaturn.livejournal.com - 2011-05-05 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

Yea pretty much. And that's why I disliked season 5 so much. Moff doesn't act like he's continuing a story; he acts like he's just made this up and can take full liberties. I'm all for different styles of writing but come on! Be respectful to the past.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only