case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2011-08-05 08:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #1676 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1676 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Toriko]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bubble Sisters, After School, Beast and T-ARA]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Frezned/YouTube]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Orc Stain]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Tiger & Bunny]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.
[My Fair Lady]


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.
(Strawberry Shortcake's Berry Bitty Adventures)


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.
[Glee]


__________________________________________________



19. [tb]


__________________________________________________














[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]











20. [SPOILERS for Harry Potter]



__________________________________________________



21. [SPOILERS for Harry Potter]



__________________________________________________



22. [SPOILERS for Voyager]



__________________________________________________



23. [SPOILERS for Agents of Cracked]



__________________________________________________



24. [SPOILERS for A Dance with Dragons/A Song of Ice and Fire]



__________________________________________________



25. [SPOILERS for A Dance with Dragons]



__________________________________________________



26. [SPOILERS for A Dance with Dragons]



__________________________________________________














[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













27. [TRIGGER WARNING for self injury]



__________________________________________________



28. [TRIGGER WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



29. [TRIGGER WARNING for non-con and pedophilia]



__________________________________________________





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #239.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Not really.

One thing is that a fictional child is not a child, it is an idea. An idea of what a child represents, universally or to the person who wants to read about it. An innocent, a powerless thing, a taboo that's sexually exciting to see breached in and of itself. Etc.

Another thing is that you have no idea what a person is thinking or fantasizing when they request these things. One person requesting rape may envision themselves as the rapist. The other may envision themselves as the person being raped. Or both parties at once. Or a voyeur totally disconnected from the events. Or all of the above.

[identity profile] tw-31988.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Innocent, powerless things can be represented in other ways besides children which is what is being judged rn... can't an adult be powerless? If the idea involves children in a sexual manner, regardless of what it represent, there's something wrong with it.

But even being a voyeur or the rapist or whatever role you wanna take, it still implies that this situation involving children is appealing to you regardless of the role.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
i don't know you bother with this. people are going to keep wanking to this kind of fic whether you want them to or not.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
why you*

[identity profile] tw-31988.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
doesn't mean i can't let them know i think they're sick bastards.

:)

[identity profile] oflittlebrain.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
omg you're right that solves everything! TRYING TO MAKE PEOPLE FEEL BAD IS ALWAYS THE SOLUTION

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
They SHOULD feel bad over sick shit like this. They shouldn't have a community of people encouraging them, either.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Why? Why should anyone feel more sick over this than any other hardcore kink? Honestly, what exactly would that solve?

[identity profile] yuumeko.livejournal.com 2011-08-09 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
no one is encouraging child molestation, but no one is encouraging people who already have such fetishes be labeled as 'sick bastards' right off the bat.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
The fact that it's extreme is what gets them off. Your outrage just reinforces the fact that it's dirty or bad. And they like that, I'm sure.

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
It implies that to YOU. YOU'RE deciding you know what turns someone on IRL by seeing what they like to read in their fantasy de-aged fandom kink porn. The human psyche, especially the id, ESPECIALLY the part that controls being turned on, isn't so easily summed up and compartmentalized.

People who play violent video games, do they want to kill people IRL? They're getting pleasure out of killing fictional people, after all.

This is an argument as old as time, and you're on the wrong side of it.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
All of your posts are golden. :) I may not like underage kink fic but I don't think the people who enjoy it are pedophiles either. Personally, I have a number of kinks that I love reading about in fiction but would never want to do in real life. Why is that so hard for people to understand?

[identity profile] cold-river-blue.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
... but I don't think the people who enjoy it are pedophiles either.

But see, you're running up against the same problem the poster you're replying to brought up. You might like to read about stuff that you would never want to experience in real life. But there are many people who like to read about specific kinks, and who also hope to/have had/plan to have those experiences in real life. I, for example, have never found a kink titillating in fiction that I would not (and in most cases have not) experienced in real life.

You can't claim that nobody who enjoys reading pedophilia kink stories is an active or prospective child molester. You aren't. But you can't speak to or for everybody else.

Of course, I can't definitively claim that anyone on that meme is an active child abuser, or would even want to be. But I can claim that it is somewhat common for child molesters to seek out spaces where they can trade stories with other child molesters. Some of those stories may be true, some may be fictional/fantasy accounts. Sometimes this is a lead-up to trading actual pictures or videos of real kids. Sometimes this is a way for potential abusers to work themselves up to approaching a real child. Sometimes, obviously, this is an outlet for inappropriate desires that people use as a means to avoid harming an actual child. But the point is, we don't know why people are requesting, sharing, or reading these stories. So, while I'm sure that you aren't a child molester, I'm equally sure that you have absolutely no grounds to claim that nobody who enjoys those type of stories is.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
na

I'm equally sure that you have absolutely no grounds to claim that nobody who enjoys those type of stories is.

But no one has claimed this to be the case. What's being argued is the implication that if you read/write underage fic, you must be a pedophile, which is no more true than the assumption that if you read/write noncon, you must be a rapist or want to be raped. No one is arguing that there's definitely not a single reader or writer of underage fic that has those desires IRL, but rather that fandom is not the place to police those thoughts.

[identity profile] cold-river-blue.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
My intention is not to police anyone's thoughts, but rather to express my own discomfort with that type of fiction being embraced by a fandom that I enjoy. I was replying to a pretty specific quote which expressly stated that the poster did not think that people who enjoy kiddie-rape fic are pedophiles. There's no "most" or "many" or any other qualifier there. I was simply adding a qualifier. Maybe that seems pedantic to you, but to me it seems naive to believe that many of these requests/fills are not being made by active child molesters.

My point is this: More than 1 in 20 children are sexually abused at some point in their childhood. Some estimates put it as high as 1 in 3 for girls (1 in 7 for boys). A substantial number of those acts are committed on children under the age of 12. Who do we think are committing all these deviant acts, and do we think they are more or less likely than the average person to enjoy reading fictional stories about adults raping children? I would put my money on the former.

I do not think that all people who enjoy reading those stories are molesters. I really don't. I do not in any way mean to imply that anyone involved in this discussion would ever harm a child, or anything else. But I don't think it is safe to assume that all, or even most, of the people who are sexually aroused by reading about child rape would never consider harming an actual child.

(Sorry for the teal deer. I have a lot of feelings about this, and despite my intention to back away slowly, I have been sucked in.)

[identity profile] beandelphiki.livejournal.com 2011-08-07 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
Number one, fuck this fucking slippery slope fucking bullshit.

You know what this reminds me of? I've been reading some stuff about "signature" serial killers by criminal investigator Robert Keppel. And it's interesting, but he keeps saying things like:

But judging from his sexually deviant behavior in photographing women in undergarments while bound and gagged in various degrading and humiliating positions, his plan had to have been to kill them in the first place.

Can you see what's wrong here? There are plenty of people out there who'd take sexual interest in "photographing women" bound and gagged in their underwear, and thousands more who'd enjoy said photographs, and they all aren't out choking women to death like the guy being discussed.

I'm grossed out and offended by statements that imply that the porn is taking people by the hand and leading them to commit crimes. You frequently see shrinks and people who work in law enforcement claim that certain types of porn are dangerous because they are catalysts for behaviour or some such, never checking the fact that their view is biased because of the populations of people they work with. Last I checked, child molesters can molest children completely absent any kiddie porn.

If someone is "working up" to molesting a child by viewing child porn, they have already consciously or subconsciously crossed a line in their own mind, and the porn is incidental to that.


Number two...I have no way of knowing if you are also a survivor of CSA, but when threads like this inevitably devolve into child abuse stats, I tend to feel kind of nauseated and used. What, is my abuse (indirectly, since no one here is referencing me specifically, but) fodder for e-peen stroking contests? Or just fuel for people's personal fires of righteous indignation?

You know what would actually, logically, help actual children more?

SHAMING PEDOPHILIA LESS.

Not the act of abusing a child; pedophilia, the desire.

I mean, do people here think that pedophilia confers massive fucking stupidity?! Peds KNOW how much they're despised, even if they have never actually touched a child. That's something that keeps even pedophiles who agree with society's dim view of their having sex with children deeply closeted out of fear that their life would be entirely destroyed if anyone knew they even had that desire. Which is something that keeps peds from, say, forming support groups, or seeking out therapy (like CBT, maybe) to vent and help them refrain from acting on a desire for children. Which helps no one.

Exactly what do people here think it fucking accomplishes to post shit like, "Well, some of those people might really, actually want to bone kids in rl, so let's not abandon shockhorrorsquickshame just yet!"

Oh yeah, that's real fucking useful.

Some of those prompters might, indeed, be actual pedophiles. (Although I'm inclined to doubt the idea that there's a group of peds attracted to fandom fics JUST because it has kids getting abused in them. Do you know how easy it is to find kiddie smut stories? Why would they need fandom?)

So. Fucking. What.

[identity profile] megumi-kitten.livejournal.com 2011-08-06 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
This is a good point.

I just avoid the kinks that don't do it for me, really.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
that seems to be the logical way to maneuver a kink meme, but somehow it seems to be a concept some people can't quite grasp.

(Anonymous) 2011-08-06 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
And if people infantilized adult characters to play to the same fetish you would accuse them of pedophilia ANYWAY. Everyone loses!