Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-16 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2022 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2022 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #289.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I guess maybe it's a concept of scope, too. Like I said, a library book is really only going to reach about 50 people per physical book. Maximum. (I'm really trying to remember if I've ever seen an item come up with over thirty uses. It's rare.) A book bought second-or-third hand only goes to one or two other people. It isn't turned into hundreds or thousands of itself. For the cost of a single item, it only reaches a (relative) few people, as opposed to hundreds/thousands.
I've honestly never heard anyone say "don't buy second hand books." I've never even heard creators say that.
I'm a pretty big fan of second-hand books for a number of reasons (we get/sell a lot of them at the library too, and staff always gets first crack. I've picked up a lot of awesomeness that way). They have a certain feel to them, a weight that's comforting. And yeah, cheap helps. I hear you on that last bit. Some 25-cent copies of early Dresden Files books are why I shell out way too much money for each hardcover the day it comes out.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)I have a 1901 copy of Emma that despite a little fading of the bindings due to sun and age is in wonderful condition. Books are the same as anything else, they will last if cared for.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)And when I lent books out to friends and explicitly told them to keep the books in mint condition, they were returned with folded corners and creased spines. Guess what? I learned my lesson. I don't let anyone borrow my favorite books anymore. The general public doesn't know how to keep books in mint condition and they don't care to even when the books are other people's property.
In my experience video game cartridges and discs can take way more abuse than paper books. If your experiences are different, good for you. You're a lucky anon.
no subject
Your own personal collection, sure, those will last because you take care of them. I take care of my books, and they last. Because they're mine. The General Public will not extend the same courtesy to Free Stuff from the library. (That applies to movies too. I watch patrons let their infant child hold/open the cases to DVDs because, as far as they're concerned, it's a toy, right?)
no subject
That's why they sell game insurance. You can't make a book unreadable just by stepping on it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-18 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)Insurance exists because people put value on the item being insured. I think the lack in book insurance reflects how little people care about books rather than how durable it is.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-19 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)For the record, I do not think it is not okay to resell games.
no subject
So yeah, that argument doesn't really hold water in light of what is and is not generally considered "okay" to resell.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-19 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Let me repeat what I said earlier.
You talked about the durability of games (DVDs) and books and insurance. I replied about the durability of books, DVDs and insurance. What does reselling books and games have to do with our conversation?
no subject
If you didn't want to carry on that conversation, but just wanted to point out that books are less durable than games for absolutely no other reason than to point out that books are less durable than games, but that it has no bearing on the conversation at hand about reselling whatsoever, then...
...Okay, bizarre interjection taken.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-22 02:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
A thought, for future.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-22 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)It was seriously one of the most bizarre displays of anger we'd ever seen. XD
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)Also, not so many folks who read a book once and then sell it/donate it a week or two after buying it. Maybe with romance novels, but for comics especially, people tend to hang onto those for a while. So there's a bit of time lapse as well, whereas you see people turn around and sell a game back as soon as they've beaten it, which makes fairly new games available for cheap, no-profit-to-the-original-source, second-hand more quickly, while the game itself is still up on the shelf.
There's the other thing about comics. Western comics, at least, have grown up almost needing the second-hand market, because most floppies haven't been collected into trades, and trades go out of print. Those new games are still pretty available.
I don't really think it's killing the industry, though. Just maybe those could be some of the reasons.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)