Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-08-07 06:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #2044 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2044 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Yamato nadeshiko Shichi Henge/Perfect Girl Evolution]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Suits]
__________________________________________________
04.

[A Song of Ice and Fire]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Yamato nadeshiko Shichi Henge]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Sherlock BBC]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Sherlock]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Stargate Atlantis]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Cyborg 009]
__________________________________________________
11.

[The Amazing Spiderman]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Stargate Universe]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Avatar: the Last Airbender]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Bunheads/Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
15.

[thesyndicateproject (youtube)]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Codex Alera]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Wishbone]
__________________________________________________
18.

[The Game OverThinker]
__________________________________________________
19.

[K-ON!]
__________________________________________________
20.

[Magical Diary]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #292.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-07 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)I think it was either him or Benedict that also referred to Irene as "awakening his sleeping sexuality" or something like that.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-07 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)I mean death of the author is a thing and all, but when at least one head writer is writing him as straight but repressed, and Benedict also considers his character repressed ("burned by a woman in his past" or however he put it) then it's not really a case of "clear as day" asexual.
no subject
Seriously, as annoying as Moffat's views on asexuality are, at least he seems to understand that it's an orientation*, and not just something that happens to people when they the have relationship problems, and can be "dropped" when the right person shows up.
*Before anyone brings it, up, no he did not use the term "the choice of an asexual". In context:
"It’s the choice of a monk, not the choice of an asexual."
I read this to mean: A monk chooses not to have sex, an asexual doesn't. Of course, this is wrong, some asexuals do have sex. But again, at least he seems to understand being asexual isn't a choice.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-07 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 12:06 am (UTC)(link)A lot of people think of "asexuality" as referring to things like amoebas and shit. Before I heard people talking about it on the internet a few years ago, I never would have thought someone would call themselves asexual. It initially seemed very strange to me until I researched it further
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Wait nevermind, I misread your comment
ignoooore meeeee
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 12:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 02:34 am (UTC)(link)Cumberbatch most likely meant grey-a but didn't know how to express that. He clearly understands the no interest in sex part but is unlikely to be aware that asexuals can experience sexual attraction, which you seem to be unaware of as well. So, yeah, you're kind of a bigot yourself.
And meeting the right woman (and of course it's a woman...)
Seriously? Are you even familiar with ACD canon? Irene's always been a woman and always had a unique relationship with the misogynistic Sherlock.
no subject
But he didn't say Sherlock is an asexual who found himself experiencing sexual attraction; he say he was asexual UNTIL he met Irene. Imagine if Ben said, "Sherlock was gay until he met
Irene". Not, "He met Irene and started questioning his sexuality", just "he was gay until..."
which you seem to be unaware of as well.
I know asexuals can experience sexual attractions. But that's not what Ben said.
Irene's always been a woman
Yeah, no shit. I mean, of course Ben said it was meeting a woman that awakened his sexuality, and not, say, John. Or, hell, even Moriarty. But, no, of course Sherlock is straight.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 04:47 am (UTC)(link)I hear this same shit with bisexuality all the time. "She went lesbian" or "He was straight until he met him". Both examples are bisexual, but a lot of people see it as an abrupt change rather than a shift along a spectrum. It's the way people understand sexuality because they don't know any better. Asexuality's name makes this an easy mistake, so I don't see why you're all flustered about this. It's not like some sexualities where you can look at the name and immediately know what the meaning is.
no subject
I don't think it's outright bigotry, I think it is, as you say, ignorance.
he would think Sherlock's interest in Irene means that Sherlock had to depart from asexuality to be interested.
Right, that's true.
Really, ultimately, my point is this: People sometimes use Cumberbatch's comments that Sherlock's not asexual to bolster their claim that he's not (you can see examples of it in this very tread). But if Cumberbatch doesn't even understand what asexuality is, why should I take his word?
Are you calling ACD a bigot?
Where are you even getting that from?
Sherlock's interest in Irene is canon.
Interest her intellect, yes. But if you're referring to ACD canon, it's explicitly stated he wasn't in love with her.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-09 02:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 03:16 am (UTC)(link)My two cents: it seems to be a matter of interpretation. What one person sees as asexuality another sees as celibate by choice and another sees as gay. My take: whatever he is, he isn't a Kinsey 0.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 03:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-08 01:31 am (UTC)(link)