case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-08-24 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #2061 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2061 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Xena: Warrior Princess]


__________________________________________________



02.
[tales of symphonia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Girl From Tomorrow]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Spyro the Dragon]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Lamento -Beyond the Void-]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Aidan Gillen]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Skyrim]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Touhou Project]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Total Recall]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Castle]



__________________________________________________



11.
[Spyro the Dragon]


__________________________________________________












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













12. [SPOILERS for the Dark Knight Rises]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Digimon 02]



__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILERS for the Borgias]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for Tales of Symphonia]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for asoiaf/game of thrones]



__________________________________________________



17. [SPOILERS for A Dance With Dragons]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














18. [WARNING for eating disorders]



__________________________________________________



19. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape, child abuse]



__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #294.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Please please please report it

http://www.asacp.org/index.php?content=report

Also, at least you no longer like loli/shotacon? c: It might be produced without hurting real children, but it's not unheard of for pedophiles to use child porn to groom their victims ("look, it's okay, the child there is doing it too"), so it wouldn't surprise me at all that they would look at cartoon/anime/manga/whatever porn or risqué stuff and go all "bingo! children like cartoons, they will look at this!"

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
This, exactly. It pisses me off when people try to claim that loli/shota doesn't hurt real children, because that's bullshit. Yes it does.
ext_81845: amuro ray from mobile suit gundam, in his underwear, from the doan's island episode (WTF?!)

Re: tw for child abuse

[identity profile] childings.livejournal.com 2012-08-24 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, so because something CAN be used in a harmful way, it's intrinsically harmful now? I guess Mike's Hard Lemonade must be for pedophiles now since so many pedophiles use it to get kids drunk so they can molest them

Seriously, that's your logic here. I mean, I have a huge problem with child pornography that depicts real children and loli/shota grosses me out, but one is obviously wrong and illegal and the other isn't intrinsically hurting anyone; there are plenty of people who look at cartoon child porn and aren't hurting real children by doing so. Have fun trying to impose thought crime on others

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh you.

Put down the liquor bottle and go read some studies on this stuff. Then come back and tell me all about how it's innocuous and never ever created just for the purpose of luring in victims because oh hey, kids like cartoons!

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You know I always see people on both sides talking about the "THE STUDIES!" and yet I never get a link to one.

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] writerserenyty - 2012-08-25 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] cloud_riven - 2012-08-25 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] cloud_riven - 2012-08-25 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-09-07 11:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-26 13:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] cloud_riven - 2012-08-26 20:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I disagree. Take a trip at the Content Violation forums on TV Tropes and see how many people have become so desensitized AND then had other similar people reaffirm them in a feedback loop that now they can't even tell what counts as porn or as sexualizing children.

It took them a ridiculous amount of time to decide which pages to keep, and they kept (with an instruction to "clean") a lot of pages that blatantly sexualize children in a "family friendly wiki". They saw nothing wrong with this.

I used to think just like you do until I saw that and realized that people (not all, granted, but a scary chunk) were starting to see lolicon and shotacon as normal.

Obviously not everyone reading/watching them are molesting children, but they're contributing towards keeping that market alive.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, exactly. The problem is sexualized children being so commonplace that people no longer give a shit. It's the car alarm effect. People are so desensitized to the car alarm that their intended purpose no longer exists. Nobody's going to report when they hear one go off because lol, that shit happens all the time, it's just a cat or something.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-24 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-08-25 02:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-27 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-08-27 14:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-28 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-26 00:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-27 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-26 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-26 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-25 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
To be honest, the TV Tropes forums (and the Troper Tales pages before they got axed) seemed pretty full of people who either had some issues or were outright sick fucks to begin with...

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
ummm....lol analysis fail.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
No, not really.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
keep telling yourself that; it's probably for the best, as any serious brain work would probably damage what little higher function you apparently possess.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-24 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-26 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, that's exactly right. Don't tell the "defender no-shame SJWs" here that, though.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
It might be produced without hurting real children, but it's not unheard of for pedophiles to use child porn to groom their victims ("look, it's okay, the child there is doing it too")

Oh god, and they're doing it through Facebook! FACEBOOK IS A VECTOR FOR CHILD PORN! BAN THIS SICK FILTH! WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

Association fallacy, you just walked into it. Paedophiles using loli/shota material as a tool for abuse doesn't make the material itself automatically wrong. It makes the paedophiles wrong.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
When a significant amount of it is created by the pedophiles just for that purpose? Yes, it's fucking wrong.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Got some stats on that? How many loli/shota mangaka are practicing pedophiles? Inquiring minds want to know.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not talking about manga authors. I mean the amateur stuff that gets posted to places like /b/. A lot of that shit is created with the intent of luring in victims.

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy - 2012-08-24 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] andthenithappened - 2012-08-25 02:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 12:35 (UTC) - Expand
ext_81845: amuro ray from mobile suit gundam, in his underwear, from the doan's island episode (WTF?!)

Re: tw for child abuse

[identity profile] childings.livejournal.com 2012-08-24 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
How do you even know that? Can you provide us with some citations or statistics proving that the majority of child porn is meant to groom children and not just for people to fap to in private (probably while feeling ashamed about it?)

No, because you are full of shit.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
And if you fap to that shit at all, there's something terribly, terribly wrong with you, so the point is kind of moot anyway.

But hey, I expect nothing less from you.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 02:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 02:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 02:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 03:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 03:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-26 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
And the people buying it too. Why do you even want to read porn of fictional children?

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-25 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
i just want to say to you and most of the other people on this thread:

GO TO COLLEGE

(and if you have gone...go again. you missed the point.)

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-25 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
I don't understand what you mean.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) - 2012-08-25 01:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-08-25 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-08-25 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-26 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
DA, I totally agree.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-26 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Have some Earth Logic(TM):

Preventing the pedos from accessing cartoon CP (with a diversionary name on it to make it *seem* like it's not cartoon CP) by stopping people from creating cartoon CP in the first place, either through enforcement or societal pressure, or discouraging the "fans" of this stuff through social activism or societal pressure, might actually save one child from being given one of these magazines and told what they're being asked to do/engage with is somehow OK.

Which is not a pearl-clutching THINK OF THE CHILDREN screed. It's commonsense. This cartoon CP is just as bad as having a box of weapons out in the open with "FREE -- TAKE ONE" written on the box.

Also IT IS STILL CP.

Re: tw for child abuse

(Anonymous) 2012-08-24 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Honestly, if we think about any object in our lives in terms of how it can be used to hurt children, we'll be able to find something there. Because people who want to hurt children are sick and manipulative and will use any tool they can to help them do that. There is a ton of "risqué stuff" with artistic and social value, and throwing it all out as grooming material seems pretty short-sighted.
ext_81845: amuro ray from mobile suit gundam, in his underwear, from the doan's island episode (WTF?!)

Re: tw for child abuse

[identity profile] childings.livejournal.com 2012-08-25 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
In that episode of Different Strokes the bicycle shop dude who molested Dudley showed them "cartoons with naked people in them" so apparently Ralph Bakshi is a tool for grooming, let's ban his cartoons immediately do it anyway because they are all terrible

This also begs the question of what child molesters would do if shota/loli was banned. Wouldn't they just use something else?