Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-19 05:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2148 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)I know Umberto Eco made a whole big thing - presumably a genuine theological debate at one point? Who even knows - over whether or not Jesus laughed, but I reckon He had a sense of humour. Sadly, it seems He neglected to give the same to all of His creation.
(Also, not everyone's Christian! And that's OK! The OP doesn't have to recognise or acknowledge that they recognised the image.And that's still OK!) The rest of the tone of this secret is flippant and off-hand and fun. I like that in a secret. :D
Wait. Are you wank-baiting? I feel like maybe on some level I'm being trolled.
OP: I feel your pain. My fandom's dead too. And the fuckers just won't come back.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Most people know the story/recognize the image of Jesus even if they don't know (or care) about the finer details. It's highly unlikely that someone who googled "resurrection" and found a picture of Jesus doesn't know who it is or why Google supplied it.
And try being less of an asshole to people right off the bat, huh?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)I just think the OP was being funny. Sure, perhaps not in the most tasteful way, but I don't think they were trying to be overtly disrespectful or rude - this is a YMMV moment, but since the rest of the secret was flippant and off-hand, why not take the whole thing in the spirit it seems to have been intended? But then, I'm often surprised when people are offended or upset by this sort of thing, and I double-take at it. Since everyone else here recognises the image, and we're clearly OK with attributing its source material, why the issue that the OP wants to make a joke of it?
Still, like I said, this level of sensitivity something I don't come across often. *shrug* If the original commenter finds it unpleasant or off-putting, more power to them! And if I'm being an outright asshole, then I'm sorry. They're saying they find it offensive, I'm saying I find that odd; we're both entitled to our opinions, but you're right, I could have been nicer. I intended to be flippant - I didn't intend to be a total dick. It's probably too late at night for me to make the distinction, so original anon, if I crossed the line and seriously upset you, I'm sorry. (But I do still think the secret was funny.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:20 am (UTC)(link)It's called a joke.
Asshole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:22 am (UTC)(link)And the bug is happy where he is. Quit hating.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 12:12 am (UTC)(link)I mean it might have been a troll attempt, but yeah, not everyone knows that every picture of a bearded dude in white robes in the clouds - Jesus being resurrected.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 12:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:01 am (UTC)(link)If you say so.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Even knowing nothing about previous anon:
1. Not everyone lives in a country with highly visible Christian images.
2. This image doesn't have the most recognizable symbols for Jesus.
I assumed it was Jesus because I do live in a predominantly Christian country, but if I were shown the picture and told to name the figure, I wouldn't say with absolute certainty. It could very well be a random saint. Probability in the art world says it isn't, but it could be.
So how about we be a little nicer to others?
OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 12:55 am (UTC)(link)My bad.
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:22 am (UTC)(link)But I'll give it my best try. Have you heard the one about the two hikers?
They come to a fork in the road and decide to split up, and meet up the next day. The one who goes right has a lovely hike, and when he meets up with his friend on the other side of the valley he says, "Great trees on that side! How that the left?"
His friend replies "It was super fabulous, dude!" (he was from California in the 90's). "I met this girl who was tied to the railroad, and I untied her just before a train came! She was so grateful that she let me bang her all day!"
"OMG, seriously?" replied his friend. He glanced down the trail, hoping to catch a glimpse of the mysterious girl. "Did she swallow?"
"I don't know. I couldn't find her head."
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)I didn't get the hiker joke -- can you tell another one?
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 03:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP here
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-20 04:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP here
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-20 04:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP here
Re: OP here
Re: OP here
Re: OP here
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-20 05:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP here
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-20 05:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 04:00 am (UTC)(link)I was joking, but seriously, WTF is up with this reaction?
Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 04:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP here
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 02:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:43 am (UTC)(link)yeeeeeeeaaaaahhhhh I probably shouldn't want to give the troll the benefit of the doubt....
sa
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:59 am (UTC)(link)FYI2 I didn't recognize the picture either.