[ SECRET POST #2180 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


#10 is a moving .gif!


01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fraiser]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Kili/The Hobbit]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
















09. [SPOILERS for the Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for How I Met Your Mother]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Rise of the Guardians]



__________________________________________________


















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















12. [WARNING for abuse]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape, noncon]

[American Horror Story Asylum]


__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape]

[MLP: FiM]


__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape]

[Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen]


__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for suicide]

[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for IRL murder/shootings]



__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Says who? That one tiny description by Tolkien? That was so we would have an idea of what the race looks like in general.

I think Tolkien just assumed that his readers would be smart enough to understand that obviously not every single dwarf is going to look like the norm for his or her species. His mistake, clearly.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure when Tolkien wrote the dwarfs he didn't intend for them to look like Aidan Turner.

I mean if they want to sex up the dwarfs, then good for them. Whatever sells tickets. But don't pretend that because Tolkien never described dwarfs as being prettyboys that means it's a valid interpretation.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm pretty sure when Tolkien wrote the dwarfs he didn't intend for them to look like Aidan Turner.

Why? Provide evidence.

But don't pretend that because Tolkien never described dwarfs as being prettyboys that means it's a valid interpretation.

Why can't a short, stout, bearded man be "pretty?"

[(Anonymous)]

Why? Provide evidence.

For starters, Kili was described as being blonde and with a beard in the Hobbit. So there's not a lot of interpretation with him being brunette and stubbly if your justification is that Kili could have been as such in the actual text.

By your logic, there's no reason why elves couldn't look like Danny DeVito.

Why can't a short, stout, bearded man be "pretty?"

Aidan Turner's Kili is neither stout nor bearded.

[(Anonymous)]

For starters, Kili was described as being blonde and with a beard in the Hobbit.

Blonde is a problem. Having a beard is not (unless you have some sort of minimal length requirement for a man having a beard, which would be silly).

By your logic, there's no reason why elves couldn't look like Danny DeVito.

LOL what? Elves are not described as being short. Therefore, Danny DeVito could not be an elf.

Aidan Turner's Kili is neither stout nor bearded.

He has a beard, and he is stout.

I'm guessing that you take "stout" to mean "broad" or "fat," so let's look at the complete definition of stout:

stout [stout] Show IPA adjective, stout·er, stout·est, noun.
adjective
1.
bulky in figure; heavily built; corpulent; thickset; fat: She is getting too stout for her dresses. Synonyms: big, rotund, stocky, portly, fleshy. Antonyms: thin, lean, slender, slim; skinny, scrawny.
2.
bold, brave, or dauntless: a stout heart; stout fellows. Synonyms: valiant, gallant, intrepid, fearless, indomitable, courageous, stouthearted. Antonyms: cowardly, timid, fearful, timorous, craven.
3.
firm; stubborn; resolute: stout resistance. Synonyms: obstinate, indomitable, steadfast, staunch, unwavering.
4.
forceful; vigorous: a stout argument; a stout wind. Synonyms: intense, sharp, violent.
5.
strong of body; hearty; sturdy: Synonyms: brawny, sinewy, strapping, husky, robust.

Notice how only one of those bullets describes a person's figure.

[(Anonymous)]

(unless you have some sort of minimal length requirement for a man having a beard, which would be silly

A man? No.

A dwarf? Yes. Since Tolkien dwarves are described as having beards from the beginning of their lives and they take pride in their length to the point that a dwarf will only be shaved if they are shamed.

Notice how only one of those bullets describes a person's figure.

Yes, which is why when "stout" is used to refer to a dwarf's physical appearance, they aren't referring to their personality.

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt
Oh my god why do you care so much about this. Did Aidan Turner murder your dog and force you to watch or something?

[(Anonymous)]

No, that was Ian McKellen.

[(Anonymous)]

Gosh! I can see that this is really, really important to you! I'm sorry. I didn't realize that you were actually taking this seriously.

I wish that I could live a life such as yours, one so blissfully free of anything worth caring about that I could be upset about an actor not matching the description of a character in a children's book.

[(Anonymous)]

LOL, I figured someone would pull that out when they no longer had any valid arguments left even though they're posting in the same argument on a site called FandomSecrets.

[(Anonymous)]

...You do realize that they're not gonna remake the movies no matter how much you argue that one of the 13 dwarves doesn't look dwarven enough to you, right?

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, but they will, don't you know? And even if they don't, then this person can sleep soundly in the knowledge that they presented Valid Arguments concerning the depiction of a fictional character in a book that only geeks care about.

[(Anonymous)]

LMAO, because 90% of the people posting in this thread *don't* care about The Hobbit or Tolkien's works? Seriously, you can't argue about Tolkien's descriptions of dwarves and then pretend to act like "Oh, such things are beneath me."

[(Anonymous)]

I argued about Tolkien's descriptions of dwarves? Huh, must have missed it.

[(Anonymous)]

But you're also posting on a site called FandomSecrets. What makes your arguments any more rational?

[(Anonymous)]

Let me repeat myself for people who have trouble with reading comprehension.

If you're posting in an argument about dwarves and Tolkien on FandomSecrets, you don't get to pull the "Oh, why do you care about such silly stuff?" when you run out of material without looking like a hypocrite. Because clearly if such stuff didn't matter to you, you wouldn't be posting on this thread.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, now people who disagree with you have trouble with reading comprehension! You are a master, sir or madame.

[(Anonymous)]

Nope, just that person.

[(Anonymous)]

And...what? That means that not a single dwarf has ever gone against that, in the entire history of there being dwarves?

Yes, which is why when "stout" is used to refer to a dwarf's physical appearance, they aren't referring to their personality.

It is not necessarily referring to physical appearance.

[(Anonymous)]

I love you and your reasoning! ♥

[(Anonymous)]

Provide evidence that Steve Buscemi couldn't play Frodo.

[(Anonymous)]

There is none. He could.

[(Anonymous)]

Right. And Steve Buscemi makes as much sense for Frodo as Aidan Turner does for a Tolkien dwarf.

[(Anonymous)]

If by that you mean "it makes perfect sense" because Tolkien is vague and, given that he's no longer alive, there's no longer a valid interpretation.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh sorry, I didn't know you were the authority on what is and is not "valid interpretation" of Tolkien's work.