Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-07-25 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2396 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2396 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Jason Segel, in "Forgetting Sarah Marshall"]
__________________________________________________
08.

[The Cinema Snob]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[The Fall]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 - ok enough of this spam ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-25 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(To be honest, I enjoyed the first*, but from everything I've read/heard about the new one makes me want to stay far away from now on.)
*I pretended it was AU fanfic. Really expensively produced AU fanfic
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-25 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not an TOS nut so it doesn't bother me as much as your average fan, but I'm hoping once the movies die out they start doing television shows again. I miss Trek on tv.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-25 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
-showers for thirty years-
no subject
no subject
What? Seriously?
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-26 01:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
And yeah, one step forward two steps back.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-26 02:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Yeah. The worst part really is him saying that he's not making it for the fans, which is not only an outright lie when the last movie was half shout-out material to another movie but also misses one of the best parts, in my opinion, of Star Trek. Yes, by all means broaden the appeal to more people because that's a good thing, but don't do that at the expense of the material itself, you know?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-26 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-26 01:43 am (UTC)(link)*with the implication of that didln't like the series because it was too "philosophical"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-26 11:14 am (UTC)(link)http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/j-j-abrams-star-trek-too-philosophical-192548775.html
no subject
(I like the films, but sheeeeesh did he miss the mark in several places)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-27 02:24 am (UTC)(link)I didn't know that, but yes, it definitely clears up all my confusion about the Star Trek reboot weirdness...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-27 02:21 am (UTC)(link)I have not seen 'Into Darkness' yet, and I am not sure I will: it took me months to watch the reboot movie and I was not enthused by it, finding all the characters unlikeable: not Kirk and not even Spock!
And let's not even talk about the new Uhura who has devolved from an independent, professional character into just another toothpick slim model, whose existence has to be justified by a male love interest -with absolutely no context, background or chemistry as far as one can tell? As if being the appendage of a man is the only way a woman can be relevant; how sexist for a supposedly updated version of Star Trek.
BTW, none of this is the fault of the actors - I blame JJ Abrams entirely, because he just doesn't GET the Star Trek characters. Indeed, I really like Zoe Saldana, who is a vision of beauty regardless of which movie she is in.