Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-06 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2439 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2439 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
07. [SPOILERS for Iron Man 3]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Naruto Shippuden - Road to Ninja]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Psycho Pass]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
10. [WARNING for suicide]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for rape? i think]

[orange is the new black]
__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for rape]

[Sherlock Holmes 2009]
Notes:
I think I accidentally deleted a secret today or yesterday - if yours (from the week before this one) hasn't been posted, please resubmit. Sorry about that.
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

"But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 12:14 am (UTC)(link)This is so bizarre to me. I mean, I grew up on the notion that you never reveal who you really are on the internet, because if you piss off (or attract) the wrong person, he or she will find you. On top of that, anything you say or do will stick with you for years and potentially land you in trouble. Hell, a guy who worked for my company was recently canned for things that he'd said on the internet under his real name. So, the fact that it suddenly seems to be a "thing" to try and shame people for operating under handles baffles me. These people are either intensely naive or they get off on trying to bait others into revealing too much about themselves.
Has anyone else run across this? Whether you have or not, what are you thoughts?
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 12:21 am (UTC)(link)And these are the same people who get about upset about the "invasion of privacy" by the NSA. NSA didn't have to invade anything. You laid out your entire life all over the place for all 6+ billion humans to see.
The only time I can see using your real name is if you are an artist or an author and you want to get your name out there. You are trying build a brand. But for everyone else?
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 12:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 12:33 am (UTC)(link)So I would call it some professional sensibility to keep things separate. Just because they're stupid enough to think using a RL name makes their sides more "real" doesn't mean we all will
i.e. I did argue with someone online recently and they were using their real name, with their company listed on their tumblr and I didn't point it out, but all I could think was "when people google your name or company, they're going to see our giant argument (including their several combo racist+ignorance comments) and may choose a different company wtf"
So yeah, I think using your real name is stupid - unless it's like your political twitter or professional tumblr - go pseudonyms!
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 12:47 am (UTC)(link)Honestly I don't see why people think it makes them look brave. I don't care to stand for every word in every random argument I get in the internet, specially not to some random stranger who holds no weight in my life.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Those people are stupid.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
I try and keep things hidden because I like my privacy. I don't get people who want to share everything.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 02:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 02:30 am (UTC)(link)What I like about anonymous discussions on the internet is that the interaction is stripped of the filters and conventions we apply to conversations with people we know. You can't attach a reputation to a faceless comment, you have to judge the content on its own merit. Also, people tend to say more of what they really feel. Just look at this comm, it's powered by anonymity and its ability to let people say things that they feel even pseudonyms restrict them from giving voice to.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Yeah you write that comment, click 'guest' and it still tries to make me log in with facebook or something.
No, no I don't want my opinions of whatever spamming my facebook or for random strangers to easily see it. Let me make my comment and wander off!
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
You appear to think most anonymous discussions contain merit.
Check the comment section to your average news article. The demand that you use twitter or facebook is probably the only thing keeping bigotry down.
Yeah, seriously. JUST LOOK AT THIS COMM SOMETIMES. We have people saying women can't rape men, we've had some pretty odd transphobia, we have weird beefs over fiction. Meanwhile the people here with names tend to be at least marginally nicer. Facelessness does not make people better. Interaction stripped of filters gets more brutal. I'm worried you're in a bubble of nice woobies with positive blogs. Things powered by complete anonymity tend to be shit.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:27 am (UTC)(link)"You appear to think most anonymous discussions contain merit. "
wow rude.
Maybe anons don't want to hold discussions with you because you're always so aggressive about the lack of usernames. Seems to me it's about 50/50 whether posts are nice or not, regardless of if they have an account. There's nice comments, rude comments, senseless baiting on both sides.
You certainly don't help the matter. AYRT tried to open up a discussion with their own point and you shot them down. Ever wonder that maybe you're half the problem here? >:[
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Not everything is about your personal fandom secrets experience.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 11:56 am (UTC)(link)Weren't you the one who made a snarky comment because of a book series I admitted I still like?
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-07 11:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)i'm not saying either way is better or worse, really, i guess what i'm saying is that people are fucking idiot assholes a lot of the time & anonymity doesn't really enter into it
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 02:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 03:13 am (UTC)(link)it's not like its discouraged by various internet companies either
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
Of course, I use a picture of myself as an icon, but that's because I'm fabulous.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
I care a lot about identities, but that's only because I think it's good to be held accountable on the internet for what you say on the internet. I sure as hell don't understand why people would welcome real life consequences. Hell, I don't even want to share my first name.
Re: "But what about your real name:" a new ad hominem attack
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)How about talking with me on the phone and showing you my driver's license when I come by to check out the place? Do I seriously HAVE to have a timeline of "here's what I had for breakfast" and bathroom selfies and who the fuck knows what else just to be confirmed as Real?