Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-09 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2442 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)How about we let people define their own sexuality for themselves.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-18 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, that's a thing unique enough to have it's own term?
Isn't everyone attracted to fictional characters?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 00:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 04:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)But if somebody wants me to identify with a character in their fic, they aren't going to do it by slapping a sexual label on a canon character so as to make said character more Special Snowflakey.
And if they're doing it to make a canon character share the author's own special snowflake-ness, *barf*
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 12:16 am (UTC)(link)maybe they're writing the character for them to identify with because they feel connected to the character and want more representation of their own sexuality
whoa no way people write fic for themselves?? how even
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 02:24 am (UTC)(link)I have every right not to be interested in a particular story. I'd love to live in a world where people would never call me "something-phobic" over it. And current reality is, there are people who damn well would do that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 01:32 am (UTC)(link)TL; DR Whenever I see someone's story marked with that nonsense, I skip.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 03:23 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 18:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 20:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-11 11:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 05:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 06:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 09:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 22:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-11 08:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 21:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-10 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Maybe it's just the way it's worded here, but sheesh, it went right from "this is nonsense" to "you don't sufferrrrrr" quickly enough that it seemed to be implying some relation between the two. What are this? What are this?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 05:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm pretty sure this has been said about every single Internet subculture in existence, including ones that date back to the early 90s via Usenet.
I mean, let's be honest here. If you'd never heard of otherkin before Tumblr, you're either very young or been doing the internet equivalent of living under a rock. People have been mocking otherkin since the era of Diary-X and invites-only Livejournal, ffs.
Tumblr's just a site, guys. It's not some magical land of spontaneous internet wizardry devoted to inventing wholecloth everything you hate. The Internet was full of beliefs and identities you would have hated in 1993, I promise.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-16 16:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)But I still reserve the right to laugh my hole off at the term "demisexual" until anyone can describe it in a way that resembles anything other than an overactive special-snowflake gland.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 04:02 am (UTC)(link)"demisexuality" is the norm and anyone who thinks otherwise gets all their ideas about sexuality from pop culture.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 05:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I get jumped on every time I say this, though.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject