case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-26 06:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #2459 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2459 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-26 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Mostly I'd just get hate, but I tried to read LOTR. I liked Fellowship enough, but The Two Towers was so tedious it made me fall asleep. But I loved the movies. In other words, I liked the LOTR movies better than the books.

At least as a teen. Maybe if I read them now it would be different.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2013-09-26 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I tried to read The Hobbit for a month and couldn't get through half. I didn't even bother with LOTR.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-27 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
I don't get the appeal with the Hobbit, either. It felt like any old generic adventure story. The characters weren't interesting at all, they were all pretty one-dimensional and having 12 almost identical dwarves didn't help. It was just descriptions of their traveling and OH incident here and there.

I tried LotR and quit after one chapter.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-27 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
That's not too surprising. The first half of the Hobbit drags. The second is where it picks up.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2013-09-26 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I tried to read the fellowship and got halfway thru. It was sooooooo boring.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-26 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think there's anything where it's harder for me to remember that sometimes different people have different tastes and that's okay than it is with Lord of the Rings.

Like, I obviously know that in an abstract way. But with LotR I just love it so much and I think it's so brilliant and that abstract knowledge gets lost sometimes.

Sooooo sorry about that, I guess.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-26 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Idk, most Tolkien fans I know are pretty willing to admit that, yeah, he's a pretty dry writer and that's not for everyone [...and I think that's been the general response to the secrets like this that I've seen.]
cassandraoftroy: Chiana from Farscape, an alien with grayscale skin and hair (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] cassandraoftroy 2013-09-26 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I read the Hobbit with no problem.

I made it through The Lord of the Rings, but it was a slog after Fellowship.

I got maaaybe a third of the way through the Silmarillion before I threw in the towel.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] tabaqui 2013-09-27 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
I actually finished Silmarillion, but it was soooo very tedious.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-26 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I have never managed more than a paragraph of Tolkien's prose before being so bored I wanted to claw out my eyes.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-27 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Tolkien had the greatest stories to share but he should have found someone else - anyone else - to write them.
nightscale: Starbolt (Storm)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] nightscale 2013-09-27 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
I quite enjoy Tolkien's work but it is not the easiest literature to get through, LoTR gets a bit slow in places and man the Silmarillion is a hard read. I remember the Hobbit being fun, but I was a lot younger when I read it last.
bringreligiontothewamwams: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] bringreligiontothewamwams 2013-09-27 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Silmarillion gets a lot better if you read it aloud btw. Fits right in there with JRRT's ideas on Anglo-Saxon oral histories.
bringreligiontothewamwams: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] bringreligiontothewamwams 2013-09-27 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Two Towers is very middle-bit-of-a-trilogy just read a recap page and skip straight to Return of the King and you'll get the story. Skip the bit about the Hobbits going home and go straight to the epilogue about the gray havens too.
ryttu3k: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-09-27 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, it's fine :) Tolkien, uh, really loves details. Details in EVERYTHING. Details on every little bitty thing that happened. He interrupted a battle to tell us about the attacker's personal history, and... yeah, not that great with flow.

I mean, I personally love the fuck out of detail, and also love the fuck out of his writing. But believe me, there is no shame in not being able to get through that dense, DENSE prose. (And I say this as someone who's considered LOTR to be their favourite book since age eleven!)
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-09-27 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I read through the trilogy in middle school, along with The Hobbit and The Silmarillion, and let me tell you I completely recognize that Tolkien's writing style isn't for everyone.
scrubber: Naota from Fooly Cooly (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] scrubber 2013-09-27 08:47 am (UTC)(link)
What the hell kind of twelve year old were you.

(I mean this in a good way)
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-09-27 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
A bored one who was trying hard to improve her spelling/English skills. I also had a lot of alone time I decided to spend in the library.

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

(Anonymous) 2013-09-27 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Aaaah, me too. Got through the 3 of them when I was 12 in like 2 weeks, I ADORED THEM. I also read basically every book King ever wrote at that time along with a lot of russian literature and other classics, it was probably the time of my life I read more books. Now I have no time. :(
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-09-27 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahaha, sounds like you really had a time.

And I'm the same. I keep trying to read the latest book in a series I used to read and I can just never find the time.
purpleseas: (dean and sam prank war)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] purpleseas 2013-09-27 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
I love the LOTR movies and enjoyed reading The Hobbit, but yeah, the LOTR books were pretty rough for me because I just don't like that writing style. I got through the bulk of the trilogy by reading it aloud in silly accents. There are some descriptions of Gollum in there that really wowed me, though, so I was glad I stuck with it. That and the Barrowdowns stuff, great horror imagery.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] tabaqui 2013-09-27 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
I've read The Hobbit, and most of LotR. Can't do the rest, they're just...not interesting, to me.
dimestoresaint: Benson and Stabler (Default)

Re: An Unexpected Opnion

[personal profile] dimestoresaint 2013-09-27 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
I never managed to finish the third book. Come to think of it, I don't think I made it through the third movie, either.