Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-10-26 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2489 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2489 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #356.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
It makes me wonder: how necessary is it? Do they truly get higher ratings with it? Are there dudes out there who would not watch KLK, but do now because they get to see a girl embarrassed in her underwear?
I mean, probably, I guess. It just seems weird to me that people would be "Nah, I don't want to watch that show--wait, rape jokes? I'M THERE!"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)Not trying to yell at you or anything btw, just genuinely curious.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 01:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
1. Would you keep watching the show if the overt fanservice stopped? (presumably yes?)
vs
2. Would I have continued to watch the show if the overt fanservice stopped (definitely yes)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)This is like watching a porn movie and complaining because there are sex scenes Kill la Kill is directed by Imaishi, produced by Trigger that are former Gainax employees. Of course that there will be fanservice, female nudity and sexualization. I'm glad that this time there's something for me too. I'm loving all the scenes with the shirtless teacher and I'm sure I'll enjoy the naked guy of next episode.
no subject
And I even like fanservice in a lot of places. I like boobs as much as the next lesbian, fgs.
But the overt sexualization of a character who does not want to be sexualized is really gross to be. If it were like Bayonetta or Panty & Stocking, where it's within the characters' personality to pose sexily and show some skin, it would be fine. But depicting scenes where a girl who doesn't want to be exposed is forced to dress in a really skimpy outfit and have everyone leer at her, and then to say that she should accept this if she wants to be powerful? That's upsetting to me, and makes me stop enjoying the show.
I disagree that it's the nature of the genre. I've seen other stuff that Trigger and Gainax have done. They could be better.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Yeah, I'm pretty grossed out by it too. :/
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-30 04:11 am (UTC)(link)Even the title refers to the clothing idea; kiru means "being dressed".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 01:18 am (UTC)(link)That is indeed the problem, but it is not MY problem. Yes, media that makes light of rape is not for me. It should not be for anyone. Trying to suggest that I just leave it be and ignore it because "It's made for guys, ofcourse you don't like it" is ignorant bullshit.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 09:59 am (UTC)(link)Please kill youself.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 11:17 am (UTC)(link)http://politix.topix.com/homepage/1475-no-encouraging-suicide-from-your-computer-is-not-free-speech-court-rules
I wish you lego-covered floors for the rest of your days. :)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-10-27 15:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-10-27 17:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-10-27 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-26 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Now whether those themes are worthwhile is another question, but then again it's an odd question in the first place.
I mean fundamentally the majority of TV isn't at all 'necessary', why is this your line.
no subject
I guess it might be better to say "is the show better for having it?" or "is it worth driving off an audience who would otherwise like it?" rather than "is it necessary." In the first episode, gosh, I so wanted to like it, but I kept getting thrown out of the moment because it kept creeping me out. I wanted to like this show! I really did!
For instance, cannibalism is pretty necessary to Hannibal, even though that concept can be alienating. It is thematically appropriate to the show, and the show would not work without it.
Shinji masturbating to completion over Asuka's comatose body was thematically relevant to End of Evangelion's "FUCK YOU FANBOYS THIS IS WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE" ongoing theme. It is alienating, but since the whole point of the movie was Shinji's downward spiral and disassociation from all personal contact, and this added to it. And also that Anno hates you. :D
If making the lead dress in a sexual way she does not want is to the theme of the show, then I suppose that's fine, although it depends on where it goes, like you said. In the first episode, it seemed utterly unnecessary to the show--it could be removed, and we'd be left with goofy over-the-top fights and a kickass main character and weird worldbuilding and the show would be better for it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-27 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
If they did, they wouldn't do that.
Doesn't mean it's not shitty.