Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-04 03:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2559 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2559 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)I've HATED Sherlock's season 3 first episode. And I loved all about the two previous seasons. Just this one... ugh. I hated what they did with Molly and with Anderson, I couldn't stand Mycroft, I didn't like how John reacted, I didn't like how Sherlock behaved, the whole plot was unforgivably long-stretched and boring with a LOT of slo-mo crap, the soundtrack was horrendous, the deductions are starting to sound more and more ridiculous... JESUS HOW WAS THIS PART OF THE SERIES. Or is it maybe just me not being into it anymore? I don't know. :/
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)Anyway, short description: John got angry, punched Sherlock in the face a lot (which he deserved I guess), and after a while went back into the loop. They bonded again over a defused bomb or whatever. It all felt pretty much sterile to me.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
i think it's better on a rewatch because you know what parts are truly horrendous so it's not as much of a cringeworthy surprise the second time around and you can focus on the good bits of the episode that aren't fragmented to hell or oversaturated with filters/lensflare. there's a good storyline hidden beneath the poor writing. but overall it wasn't up to standard at all.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)I'll try to rewatch it though, maybe it'll grow on me. Crossing fingers for next parts, hoping the pampering to fans won't become the status quo for this new season. Meh. I'm so afraid for the new villain.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)That probably, or maybe just lack of perspective. We've been waiting so long for this episode that a lot of people had built up expectations that were frankly never going to happen. Everything about BBC John indicated he had a temper, but we've had continual arguments about how the reunion would be all casual and forgiving (mostly people who favor the book canon). We've all come up with our own "how Sherlock survived" theory, so of course they wouldn't bother to confirm or explain it. The "case" in this one was less important than the character reunion, so of course it was going to be in the background and pretty unnecessary. As for the characterization...eh. Two years can change a lot about someone.
I understand the complaints people do have about the episode, but it's pretty in keeping with previous episodes and its creators.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)I'm wondering if Moffat and Gatiss aren't actually geniuses and will later come back and say SEE THIS IS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE GAVE YOU WHAT YOU WANTED TUMBLR but honestly I don't think so.
It just came off as a mockery of the series.
Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 03:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 10:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Sherlock BBC, why.
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)