Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-08 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2594 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2594 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 08:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)Holmes: "Watson and I never had anything approaching a partnership. When he was with me, he was an extra set of hands, nothing more."
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 21:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 05:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 01:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
that's hilarious
It reminds me of this dude who decided to start a business in publishing but was unsuccessful, having published only one book before going broke; the one book he did publish was Lion Feuchtwanger's Jew Suss, the cover of which proudly proclaimed that the author's name was "Lion Feuchtwagner".
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 21:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 21:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Also, as a side-note, I've always thought the main character was Watson, not Holmes.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 22:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 22:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 22:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)Even before I knew all the details you mentioned, I was already turned off by how blatantly Mary Sue-ish all this seemed. It was only later that I found out how wide the age gap was and how Watson is treated and I said "Well, screw that."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)Though I am now highly amused that Mary ends up with her own "migrating wound".. er.. scars. "Locked Rooms" just killed it for me.
As for her portrayal of Watson, I just chalked it up to she chose Jeremy Brett's Homes, and Nigel Bruce's Watson. *shrug* Nigel Bruce's Watson is rather obtuse, in my opinion.
Then again, I'm just a casual fan, not a Holmesian or even a Sherlockian.
As for the age gap? It's not inconceivable for some young women to prefer much older men. *raises hand* Er, I'm no longer THAT young, but you get my point.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-08 22:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 05:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)But in this case it fits.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 05:20 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 05:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:42 (UTC) - ExpandYour definition of shit does not match mine
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Your definition of shit does not match mine
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Your definition of shit does not match mine
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 11:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 15:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 11:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 01:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 05:12 am (UTC)(link)Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 05:20 am (UTC)(link)And Holmes doesn't fall in love with her until she's almost past marrigiable age by the more of the age they both exist in, anyway.
Re: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 05:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 06:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 07:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 11:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Um, no, I don't think so
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 11:12 (UTC) - ExpandI just wanna say...
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 08:04 am (UTC)(link)In so many of my other fandoms, my faves are unappreciated, ignored, or deemed boring and shallow and therefore acceptable targets for misuse, that I pretty much automatically expect to always be in defensive/justifying mode when discussing them. The Holmes fandom's appreciation for Watson pleases me to no end. :)
Re: I just wanna say...
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 08:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 09:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-09 11:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(WTF library, you usually have better taste than that.)