Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-22 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2636 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2636 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Pinocchio]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:54 am (UTC)(link)And... yeah, people use the term in dumb ways sometimes. But that's no reason to put it on the Godwin level. There is such a thing as an obsessed fan and it's an amusing term for them, and stupid people are going to be stupid no matter what slang terms there are. If I call myself a stan, or refer to the existence of stans in an abstract sense, I don't think that's comparable to the discussion-ending use of the term you mention.
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:44 am (UTC)(link)The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: The only usage that matters
Re: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 01:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 01:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 01:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 01:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: The only usage that matters
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 03:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 03:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:04 am (UTC)(link)That is the stupidest thing I have heard. Hell, those people are taking a pre-existing name and turning it into something derogatory. Should all guys named Stan be ostracized for their racism?
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:30 am (UTC)(link)My position that it admittedly does also serve a shorthand for identifying twats who have no further arguments other than merely disliking another's position on a character stands however.
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:12 am (UTC)(link)It's always nice to see from fresh material around here. A+, much better then radfem!anon and others of their ilk. Shine on, you crazy diamond.
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 04:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 01:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 01:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 03:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 03:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-23 02:23 (UTC) - Expand6/10
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Pet peeve about use of the word "stan"
(Anonymous) 2014-03-23 02:15 am (UTC)(link)