Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-28 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2642 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2642 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
03. http://i.imgur.com/BVCZgbY.gif
[moving gif]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Michelle Lee]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Ping Pong the Animation]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Lord of the Rings]
__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14. [SPOILERS for Pandora Hearts]

__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for sexual/emotional abuse]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #377.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-28 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:21 am (UTC)(link)What you're doing is victim blaming and taking responsibility away from the asshole who "profited" from their naivety, anon. That's a douchey attitude and you should cut that out.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 12:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:04 am (UTC)(link)As a 24 year old, there is a world of difference between the mentality of a 14 year old and someone in their mid twenties. A kid doing something without thinking it all the way through should not be judged or held to the same standards as a 25 year old. Because, holy shit, teens are stupid and easy to take advantage of.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:55 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 01:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 02:04 am (UTC)(link)Real life examples of consequences are proven to discourage people from making decisions that lead to them. Even sexual assault.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 08:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)People get attacked by bears while harmlessly taking a walk in the forest. Nobody tells them it's their fault. But if people ... dunno ... camp out and leave food lying around and a bear attacks them, well ...
BUT nobody would speak of victim blaming here, right? because you just can't go point a finger at a bear and say OMG you evil!
Saying the victim is partially responsible does not relativize the deed, but it does have an educational effect.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)I suppose I don't think there's any utilitarian purpose to pointing out that someone making less stupid decisions wouldn't have been victimized in these particular cases, I just object to people denying the blindingly obvious. Like, don't rub it in with the victims, just get them help, and don't use it to excuse the offenders, just punish them, but by all means tell other people "Don't do these stupid things."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 02:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 05:28 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-29 06:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-03-29 06:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-29 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
these were young, preteen to ten fangirls. hey, maybe when you were 14-17 you were above any kind of idolatry of authors or singer or franchises, but the fact remains these were fangirls of youtubers whose appeal is specifically molded around appeal to these girls and these guys, a good bit older than them (19-21) specifically came onto them.
and then proceeded to try and initiate sexual relations with people they KNEW idolized them to some degree (not to mention vulnerable in the sense of being younger and inexperienced), using coercive and manipulative tactics if they in any way resisted.
like, how young does "underage" have to be for you to start thinking maybe the LARGE MAJORITY of the onus goes on the asshole who deliberately sought out young, naive girls that were predisposed to trust and idolize him and used their inexperience and idolatry as a way to get away with treating them like shit? 13? 12? 10?