Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-10 04:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #2929 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)I would argue that those are just the same thing, except not using the specific word. If problematic is bad, those are just as bad (and, for saying it raises issues, more awkward to use stylistically). I mean, I'm not objecting to them, it's just that if that's your solution then it seems to me that what you're saying is that problematic isn't fundamentally bad, it's just that it gets used too much in ways that annoy you.
You could be brave and flat out give the reason you don't like something, instead of using a waffle word like problematic.
My sense is that the reason that people say "problematic" instead of "sexist" (or whatever) is because sexist (or whatever) carries a way, way bigger charge. Like, in a situation where I think the treatment of women in a given work is an issue, I don't necessarily want to say that it's sexist, because that raises a whole bundle of issues about intentionality, moral judgment, whether or not it was a conscious thing, whether or not I am making an accusation at the people who made it, etc. Saying that something is problematic sidesteps that whole issue by focusing the conversation on the work in a way that using the specific word 'sexist' doesn't.
Again, if you can think of a word that gets that across that is better than problematic, I am completely happy to use it!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 07:58 am (UTC)(link)You sound like someone who goes out of their way to avoid using "said" when writing dialogue.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)And, again, like I said above, I think saying "this is racist" comes charged with a whole barrel of weight attached to it, and if you use that language you have to immediately hedge by saying "implications connotations vibes" and I don't think that's actually a much better solution.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)Interesting, I find this is part of the reason why using "problematic" is tempting? It's like when you just want to say "flawed but in a potentially socially bad way" but don't want to have to expand because you've already mentioned why somewhere else and are just putting a stamp on something at this point. It's like the minimal amount of information to sum up your sentiments about it without going into detail -- for sure useful when I'm being lazy.
I'm tempted to use it this way (as a kind of "blah blah blah") but after seeing people who just throw it around to look correct and righteous without having to explain their reasoning at all, that's made me more reluctant...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)"This is problematic" is objective.
People are far too often unwilling to concede that their opinions are Not solid facts that everyone needs to agree with. Subjective opinions can not be used to bully people into telling you that you're right and making you feel powerful and superior.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)...It's really not, though?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 05:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 02:57 am (UTC)(link)"I think x is whatever-ist" admits that it is merely an opinion, and not undisputed fact.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Which is why it pushes so many buttons.
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's a word that means something. It has a use. Just because people are over-using it/using it wrong doesn't mean its definition ceases to be.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)The whole reason people started using problematic was because people's feelings were too fragile to call a spade a spade.
no subject
Use words that describe the specific problem. Is it skeevy about gender? Race? Sexuality? Does it use stereotypes about a certain group? Does it have minority characters who are well-rounded and fine in their own right, but sidelined in favor of the straight/white/male/cis/Christian/etc lead? Are people being sexualized in an uncomfortable way? Are people being desexualized in an uncomfortable way? Is it fine as an individual work, but disheartening in that it plays into some broader pattern? Is it a problem with the series, or a problem with something the creator said about how you're intended to interpret the series...or a problem of fans projecting their own assumptions and getting mad when that isn't realized? Is it an actual issue, or is it something fans are ginning up in order to bash people who don't like their favorite character/ship/whatever?
And so on. There's no one better word for the overall idea, there are endless combinations of better words for the different ways it manifests.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 03:42 am (UTC)(link)True, but "skeevy" would work surprisingly well in most cases.
no subject