Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-10 04:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #2929 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 15:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 03:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 13:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 04:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 07:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 13:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 05:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 02:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 22:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 00:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-12 13:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 03:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
problematic word usage detected
no subject
As always, SJW's ruin everything.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)Here's the gif in question for the curious: https://31.media.tumblr.com/e4a618a086a614b769b7d8abe336c46c/tumblr_inline_nhyo03dNp11sbtfmc.gif
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 03:43 (UTC) - ExpandPeople just need to be more specific
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)Instead of saying that, people should point out specific things and instead of saying they are "problematic" (which tells us fuck all besides that there's apparently a problem) they should point out in what ways the work stumbles and how to fix it.
For example, instead of saying Star Wars is problematic, you can say something like:
Star Wars needs more women of color (and this is true in the first six movies) and just women in general. It would have been interesting to make Mon Mothma in Return of the Jedi a woman of color, for example. Or to have a man of color play Qui-Gon Jinn (a man of Asian descent, for example, as Lucas originally wanted for Ben Kenobi) and make Mace Windu a woman of color.
Things like that. Because then you're not labeling a work as a whole problematic and you're actually proposing possible solutions instead of just tossing out criticism willy nilly.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 21:52 (UTC) - ExpandI do like the suggestion
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)(h/t to Something Awful)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)I find that gross. And problematic.
Transcript
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)Text: Fandom’s obsession with the word “problematic” drives me insane! If someone drops it in discussion, I lose interest in what they were talking about. There are plenty of words – use another!
[in tiny text] this word is a fad and has to be the most pretentious word in the internet.
Re: Transcript
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 03:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 08:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-12 20:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)If someone says it, I close the tab and never come back to the discussion, because I'm pretty sure people are just going to use that word over and over and won't even give arguments on why something is "problematic".
no subject
Maybe if I just de-exposed myself to it for long enough, the irritation would start going away though...but then, it's also often used so lazily. Just call a thing "problematic" and now you magically don't have to go through the trouble of actually explaining what, precisely, is wrong with the thing, or which of the many possible problems you're pinpointing, or what makes it a problem, or how it could be better. No critical thinking or clarification involved!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-10 23:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-10 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 08:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 13:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 12:33 am (UTC)(link)i find this secret to be problematic
everything you love is problematic
it's a problem
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 02:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-01-11 08:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-11 02:34 am (UTC)(link)And don't even get me started on "problematic fave"
UGH.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 04:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-12 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)Video Game 1 having a middle aged brown haired white male main character isn't sexist or racist.
Video Games 1-159 having a middle aged brown haired white male main character and Video Games 1-5 having anything else is problematic. Each specific example is fine, but taken as a whole body of work it shows that there's something going on.
A Marvel Movie being about a white man is fine. The fact we have 9 with 6 more scheduled before there's one with a lead black dude? Problematic.
Your friend being $5 short and needing you to spot him one day is fine. Your friend begging you for $5-10 dollars every single day and every time you talk to him is mooching and becomes problematic.
And yeah, people use it wrong, but the examples people give of "Just say it's racist/sexist/homophobic!" doesn't really work all that well. They work great for specific examples! But not for trends. An example would be when someone talked about a Zelda game where you could only play as Zelda, and people jumped all over it as sexist. Limiting your player character to one option was sexist, if you wanted it to be equal you would have to have it where you could play as Zelda or Link. Except that only works if you consider it as one game on its own, and not one part in a long list of games that has only had one option, the guy. It's not 1:0 female in one game, it's 1:14 in the franchise.
Problematic is like BMI, utterly useless when applied narrowly, a decent tool for discussing large scale.