Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-05-14 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3053 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3053 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Kid (Charlie Chaplin)/Starsky & Hutch ("Gillian")]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Network]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]
__________________________________________________
05.

[In Plain Sight]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Captain America: Civil War]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Samurai Warriors]
__________________________________________________
08. https://i.imgur.com/Tr3NZUD.jpg
[NSFW image (shirtless 16 year old? girl), discussion of underage sexuality]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Joss Whedon]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #436.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[Sci-Fi/Fantasy]
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)They're still scumbags.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)No doubt the feeling is genuine, but it is probably based on that sociological phenomenon that's had famous studies done on it (the one about men and women talking 50/50 in a classroom where the men felt like the women were dominating the conversation), wherein although they are still receiving a fair share of attention (or representation in SFF), they are so used to their privilege that it *feels* like they are not receiving enough representation.
George R.R. Martin ran the numbers and it just ain't so.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 03:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 06:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 07:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 20:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 20:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Then to find out by two vocal idiotic groups that I'm not welcome within that genre? A huge FUCK YOU to them.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)Rabid Puppies and Vox Day, on the other hand, can go DIAF.
It's a shame that they've both been lumped into the same category by many people, including you. Sad Puppies has been around for several years now, with very little hubbub associated.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-14 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-14 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 00:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 00:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 01:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 01:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 02:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 18:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)And then they spend thousands of words talking about how unfair it is that the book might not tell you every theme in the book in case they disagree with one. They ignorantly (or disingenuously) pretend the books they like have no themes whatsoever and are just "neutral" while books with an anti-capitalist bent or strong women or, heaven help us, gay people is all message-y and horrible. *automatically*.
And instead of just saying it's not to their taste - the way most people do - they do their best to vilify those works and the people who read them and try to paint them as "ruining" instead of expanding the genre. They don't just dislike reading these books, they clearly dislike the fact that they exist and other people like them. They insist people don't *actually* like them and only laud them for, I guess, SJW points?
If the sum of what they did was to suggest books they liked, fine, I'm all for that. But they're actively trying to put down and belittle not only the books they don't like and the people who like them. Is it as bad as rabids? No. But it's sure as hell a far sight from "trying to get a seat at the table."
I don't give a crap about puppies . . .
Re: I don't give a crap about puppies . . .
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: I don't give a crap about puppies . . .
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 01:52 am (UTC)(link)And this kind of bullshit is exactly why the Sad Puppies evolved. Who gives a shit about the gender of the author or the "biracial" (LOL I THINK YOU MEAN INTERSPECIES OR SOME WORD CONNOTING HALF-BREED) nature of the character?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 01:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 03:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 13:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 07:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 20:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-16 17:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-15 17:36 (UTC) - ExpandTranscript
(Anonymous) 2015-05-15 06:30 am (UTC)(link)Text: I started reading SF/F since I could pick up a book.
For me it represented an unlimited world of possibilities, beyond the ordinary.
SF/F has entertained me when I'm bored and lonely. It's made me think more about the world around me. It's seeded new ideas. It's allowed me to travel in space and time to strange worlds while sitting in the comfort of my armchair. It's taught me that not only do dragons exist, but that they can be fought and conquered.
It inspired me to pick up a pen and write my own stories and create my own worlds. Writing has sometimes been the only thing worth doing.
And then, this happens.
This bunch of butthurt pathetic children show up, and pull this stunt. Trying to tell people what they should be reading. Trying to actually LIMIT the genre according to their hateful (and batshit insane) views. Trying to tell me, and people like me, that we weren't wanted, that we don't belong, that we can't sit in the treehouse.
FUCK YOU. SF/F is for EVERYBODY.