Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-07-02 08:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #3102 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3102 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Zack and Miri Make a Porno]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Video Games Awesome]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Steven Universe]
__________________________________________________
05.

[House MD]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Blazing Saddles]
__________________________________________________
07.

[My Love Story]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Gordon Ramsay, Kitchen Nightmares]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Robert Vaughn, Jack Lemmon, William Shatner]
__________________________________________________
10.

[MMOs]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Death Note]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #443.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 12:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 12:47 am (UTC)(link)it's not an ok thing, and I just don't get why no other 'funny' old hite male gets the same acceptance as this one.
If Mel brooks's films were made by anyone else we wouldn't let this stuff slide
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 12:49 am (UTC)(link)Most people disagree with you, and so their actions follow the logic of those positions, and not the positions that you hold in your mind and want them to hold in their minds
it's not an ok thing, and I just don't get why no other 'funny' old hite male gets the same acceptance as this one.
their movies aren't considered as funny / good / obviously anti-racist
If Mel brooks's films were made by anyone else we wouldn't let this stuff slide
probably not, because they probably wouldn't be as funny / good / obviously anti-racist
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 03:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-04 19:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 02:54 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 03:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 04:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 04:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 18:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 12:58 am (UTC)(link)... Someone had to say it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 02:15 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 02:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 02:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 02:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 03:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 04:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 03:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:20 am (UTC)(link)You realize that Mel Brooks did not write this entire film by himself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazing_Saddles
Screenplay by
Andrew Bergman
Mel Brooks
Richard Pryor
Norman Steinberg
Al Uger
Could there be a clue somewhere in the above list? I wonderrrrrrrrrrrr
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:27 am (UTC)(link)also, apparently Pryor was the one who wrote the "Mongo only pawn in game of life" gag.
god damn Richard Pryor was a genius
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 01:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-07-03 02:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 01:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Plus, I also have the Mel Brooks collection, and there is an interview on there where he talks about the writing for the movie. Even back when they were writing it, Brooks was hella nervous about some of the racial content, specifically the frequent use of the n*-word, although at the same time he realized they couldn't do without it. He basically deferred to Richard Pryor, who was in reality the first among equals among the writers.
That's why The Waco Kid, Gene Wilder's character, never uses the n*-word. It's to signify that he's not racist or ignorant, unlike just about everyone else in the movie.
no subject
And don't give me that pap about how you can't be racist against white people. That's always been a dumb argument. Words have more than one meaning, and "racist" doesn't have to mean structural racism. Also, since you're condemning Mel Brooks for being personally racist, you're not even using the word to mean structural racism.
Mel Brooks did a lot of rude comedy. It was his stock in trade. I cringe at his sense of humour sometimes. (But I admit he and Cleavon Little did a good job with the race jokes in this movie.)
But an old man from a privileged background making tacky jokes does not justify your categorical condemnation of his work--just for being a privileged old white man.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 03:46 am (UTC)(link)Thank you for saying this! It boggles my mind how somehow the definition put forward by a university prof (power+privilege) has somehow become the de facto definition in the past few years.
So many times, I've seen arguments about racism go round and round in circles, because one set of people is using the p+p=r definition, and the other is simply going with the "discriminating on the basis of race" definition. And some people end up using it as a card to defend shitty behavior.
Instead of arguing semantics, it would be easier if everyone would stop being assholes. Gotta be honest, though: that'll never happen.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-03 04:05 am (UTC)(link)THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-04 02:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-04 02:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-04 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)