ext_82219 ([identity profile] shahni.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-01-30 01:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #390 ]


⌈ Secret Post #390 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.
__________________________________________________



3.
__________________________________________________



4.
__________________________________________________



5.
__________________________________________________



6.
__________________________________________________



7.
__________________________________________________



8.
__________________________________________________



9.
__________________________________________________



10.
__________________________________________________



11.
__________________________________________________



12.
__________________________________________________



13.
__________________________________________________



14.
__________________________________________________



15.
__________________________________________________



16.
__________________________________________________



17.
__________________________________________________



18.
__________________________________________________



19.
__________________________________________________



20.
__________________________________________________



21.
__________________________________________________



22.
__________________________________________________



23.
__________________________________________________



24.
__________________________________________________



25.
__________________________________________________



26.
__________________________________________________



27.
__________________________________________________



28.
__________________________________________________



29.
__________________________________________________



30.
__________________________________________________



31.
__________________________________________________



32.
__________________________________________________



33.
__________________________________________________



34.
__________________________________________________



35.
__________________________________________________



36.
__________________________________________________



37.
__________________________________________________



38.
__________________________________________________



39.
__________________________________________________



40.
__________________________________________________



41.
__________________________________________________



42.
__________________________________________________



43.
__________________________________________________



44.
__________________________________________________



45.
__________________________________________________



46.
__________________________________________________



47.
__________________________________________________



48.
__________________________________________________



49.
__________________________________________________



50.
__________________________________________________



51.
__________________________________________________



52.
__________________________________________________



53.
__________________________________________________



54.
__________________________________________________



55.
__________________________________________________



56.
__________________________________________________



57.
__________________________________________________



58.
__________________________________________________



59.
__________________________________________________



60.
__________________________________________________



61.
__________________________________________________



62.
__________________________________________________



63.
__________________________________________________



64.
__________________________________________________



65.
__________________________________________________



66.
__________________________________________________



67.
__________________________________________________



68.
__________________________________________________



69.
__________________________________________________



70.
__________________________________________________






Notes:

- First comment, you know what to do!
- Big thank you to Gargant for the help here! 8D

Secrets Left to Post: 09 pages, 152 secrets from Secret Submission Post #056.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, January 31st, 2008.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, but in the end they're still paint splatters without soul or emotion, and it opened the gate for the ability to get thousands, or millions of dollars for a painting of a red dot on a yellow canvas

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] wo-xi-huan.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, maybe you like pictures of red dots on yellow canvases? In all fairness, I doubt you or I would think of putting a red dot on a yellow canvas and trying to sell it for that much. That is: It takes a certain genius to reach such depths of idiocy.

As for paint splatters "without soul or emotion", that's just plain ridiculous. Who are you to decide what is or isn't art, when the entire population of the planet together, from now to past generations, can't decide what is or isn't art in a firm manner?
People move in certain way. One person switches legs using different body language than another, even if that person is the same age or gender. This particular body language, that is, the movement method and form, is what is used to create any artist's so-called "style" (along, of course, with personal methods of judgment regarding aesthetics).
It stands to reason, then, that even the action of splashing paint on a canvas using physical movements innate and natural to yourself will be imbued with your "style", and thus "soul".

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
The guy threw paint on canvas. Thats all he did. Dripped, threw, splattered. I could shoot a paintball gun at a canvas and get the same effect.

It's not art. It's ... just foolishness. As an artist it offends me that people that know shit about actual DRAWING are making more than amazing artists, simply because for some reason, like the yuppie bullshit you just spewed, people think there's more 'emotion' in it.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] wo-xi-huan.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
As I just mentioned, no, you certainly could NOT shoot a paintball gun at a canvas and achieve the same results. I don't understand how I could possibly explain with such thoroughness how and why this is so and yet receive such a response, but, eh. Do you agree that people move in certain ways? There, then, is your answer as to what makes your average paint-slinger's products so unique. (There's also the Chaos Theory, but that's physics and I think we might want to avoid that.)

Sadly for you, myself, and millions of others, art cannot be easily or strictly determined. As an artist myself, it saddens me that people cannot understand that different minds view different things as appealing. Also let us remember that many of our current so-called "masters" of art were scorned, ridiculed, and otherwise looked down upon in their time. I must also inquire: Do you enjoy the general art styles of anime and manga?

Two things that don't really fit in: I am not in any sense of the word a yuppie. Please refrain from jumping to unwarranted conclusions. Furthermore, in order to enhance the credibility of your arguments, please do not resort to personal slams or put-downs.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] manda-babylon.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with you. Even though I personally don't like modern art, I understand what you mean, and I do agree.

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Wo Xi Huan, here is the internet: you win it. I couldn't agree with your above statements more! If I have to hear someone say that a five-year-old could make a Rothko one more time, I'm going to punch someone. The point is, would a five-year-old ever THINK to do something like that? Could one ever produce something like that without copying, or getting the technique right? No way.

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 06:43 am (UTC)(link)
Word. I generally don't like modern art at all, but I do sortof like Pollock; either way, if you feel validated saying "Pollock wasn't an artist" there's nothing to stop somebody else saying you're not. Art is a subjective label. If I can see the beauty in stained concrete, then that can be art to me. As soon as you start saying "this is fine art and this isn't" you'll box yourself into a corner trying to explain why.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] aratama.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 07:01 am (UTC)(link)
http://discovermagazine.com/2001/nov/featpollock

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
This is awesome.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] la-bien-rose.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I would say that accusing Pollack's work of lacking soul or emotion is ignorant, to say the least. You personally may not see the value of his work, but that doesn't mean it is devoid of redeeming value. It just means that, to use the art snob parlance, "you don't get it."

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
There's nothing to get. It's interior design, if you want to call it that, but it's not art. To say his is great is to spit on artists who actually TRY and work to get where they're at. The man was a hack.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] la-bien-rose.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, you're not alone in your opinions, that is for sure, so your points may have some validity. I mean, I used to agree with you. I wondered why he was so highly esteemed in the art community. Needless to say, I saw the light. We must agree to disagree.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
You should definately work on wording.

"Saw the light" just screams "well, you're WRONG but thats ok," condescending etc etc.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, then you're a bitch AND an idiot. :) Glad to know.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] la-bien-rose.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, ad hominem attacks. That will shut a bitch up good. Look, this got out of hand pretty quickly. I'm sorry I wasn't more civil, but it is a bit frustrating that you just dismissed him out of hand without even entertaining any of the reasons why he might be so highly regarded.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-30 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
He is insulting to me as an artist. Plain INSULTING. I can guess that you are not an artist yourself.

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-30 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
*not above poster*

says the half rate fan artist

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-30 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I'm an artist, however, and I agree with [livejournal.com profile] la_bien_rose. You should stop with the generalizing; that can really ruin an argument, I'll have you know.

Most of his works aren't very pretty, but there's more to "art" than just looking nice.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) - 2008-01-31 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] xanykaos.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 02:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) - 2008-01-31 01:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) - 2008-01-31 02:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) - 2008-01-31 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] germania731.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 16:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 21:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] germania731.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 21:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] amei.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 09:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] dots.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 23:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-02-01 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) - 2008-12-09 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-12-09 22:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] manda-babylon.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
And you're a snob and a jerk. :)

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Actually no, the person that thinks jackson pollock is a 'snob'.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] manda-babylon.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 02:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] manda-babylon.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 03:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] asmaria.livejournal.com - 2008-01-31 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
you started the bitch attack, sweetheart, with your "I know more about art than you do because I'm an artist". stfu.

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
LOL

Re: 14, 44

(Anonymous) 2008-01-31 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
You are so completely wrong. Do you know anything about modern art at all?

Re: 14, 44

[identity profile] tealizard.livejournal.com 2008-01-31 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
"Modern" art is bullshit.