case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-11 06:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #3264 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Folgers Coffee Commercial]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. http://i.imgur.com/DKoxG0z.jpg
[linked for porn; anime character + random dick]


__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for London Spy]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Fargo]



__________________________________________________


11. [SPOILERS for Borderlands 2]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for abuse]




__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/nxf1nRw.jpg
[nudity, porn star James Deen]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for rape]

[The Tempest]


__________________________________________________



19. [WARNING for noncon/rape]

[Hannibal]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Okay but... you're not who they're going after by definition.

I mean really dodgy guys like to think of themselves the way you're describing but their past partners might tell you different. You'd never know.

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Well in the case of the nice dom it was his current partner who described that relationship to me. She happens to be a close friend ...actually, 90% of my close friendships are with women, so there's that.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Well in the case of the nice dom it was his current partner who described that relationship to me.

So you're arguing based on the current partner (who still loves him) describing him in positive terms? The current partner is usually going to be the biggest defender, even in cases of actual abuse and not just creepiness.

...actually, 90% of my close friendships are with women, so there's that.

This means absolutely nothing.

Look: I'm not making a specific argument about this dude. He might be perfectly fine! I'm sure there are good guys in the community. I'm saying the nature of hetero dude doms is such that I can't in good conscience point someone toward a minefield and say "jog briskly and probably nothing will explode!"

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
But those are still just your personal experiences talking. I'm not saying they're wrong or that they don't represent a subset of a population, I'm saying they're not all-encompassing.

Unless there are some statistics I'm not aware of that suggest that heterosexual males who are the dominants in BDSM partnerships are more likely to abuse their partners, I'm not sure either of us can claim we know exactly what the tendency is.

THIS THREAD IS SO CONFUSING

(Anonymous) 2015-12-12 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
When did we start talking about scientific facts? I thought the original question was "Do you think hetmale doms are creepy?" which she answered. It's all about personal experiences! And you also cited your personal experiences so I don't get why you're NOW saying that this is all about STATISTICS. You can't have math AND feelings, herpy, pick a side!

But I'm not really sure you and chard are even having the same conversation, you seem to be talking past each other here, hence my confusion.

Good day to you both!

Re: THIS THREAD IS SO CONFUSING

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
I made have expressed myself poorly. I meant to say that a person can call themselves a hetmale dom without all the identity baggage that seems to come with it for a certain subset of people who seem to be heavily into the "lifestyle" part of the equation.

I thought chard was disagreeing with that? If not, my bad lol.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: THIS THREAD IS SO CONFUSING

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe this is where we disagree.

See, if a guy is telling me he's a dom... then he's either pretty likely going to be part of that lifestyle or it's something really important to him! Otherwise, how do I know?

If a guy confides this on like the third date or something, and isn't making a big deal of it, that's different. There's a difference between "I am a Dom!" and "I am calling this being a dom because I don't have another word for it, but clearly I've been interacting with you as a normal dude too."

I have certain kinky things I'm into. I am never in a million years telling the vast majority of my friends. I'm a bit more open about it here because people don't know my name or face. If I tell my friend "Hey, Sarah, I'm really into ____!" I must be really, really, really fucking into _____.
Edited 2015-12-12 02:10 (UTC)

Re: THIS THREAD IS SO CONFUSING

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
I think that's the root of the issue, yeah.

It seems there are a few subsets of people. I will say I'm a thing without being into that thing pretty frequently, just because it denotes a casual hobby or interest.

So I could theoretically say, "I'm a polyamourous bisexual man!" and still have never once set foot at a Pride event or similar (activism/protests not included) because I don't really tie that into my identity. I don't feel strongly about it.

So "het male dom" nice guy is probably in my boat, where he's just using that to categorize himself. It's not really a personal identity, it just describes a thing he finds sexually arousing sometimes.

Does that make sense?
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: THIS THREAD IS SO CONFUSING

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
"I'm a polyamourous bisexual man!"

Okay, see: this is a different thing. Bisexuality is a sexual orientation. Polyamory is how you engage in relationships--or an orientation. Either way.

"Dom" is neither of these things. It's a bondage-related sexual role.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
But those are still just your personal experiences talking.

Okay, so let me get this straight. You--a dude--are telling a woman who's hinted very strongly she's into kink that she shouldn't trust her experiences with guys into the same things? That's like me telling you what the gay/bi male community is like and that you shouldn't give advice based on things you've actually experienced.

Unless there are some statistics I'm not aware of that suggest that heterosexual males who are the dominants in BDSM partnerships are more likely to abuse their partners

Yeah, this sure sounds like a study that'd actually get funded.

I'm not sure either of us can claim we know exactly what the tendency is.

No, but again, one of us is female and the other isn't. Your experiences with hetero guys are by definition really different! They aren't trying to date you. They aren't sending you weird messages.

Look at it this way: assault is absolutely 100% never the victim's fault. But if a younger friend comes up to me and says "hey! there's this frat on campus known for really shady shit holding a party this weekend, should I go alone and get wasted, maybe I'll meet a nice guy" you know damn well what my advice is going to be. And it's not going to involve looking up a study about frat boys so I can provide detailed statistics.
Edited 2015-12-12 01:47 (UTC)

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
But none of those experiences are me with hetero guys? They're second hand experiences from women who are friends. Oh, and the first one was from a straight up craigslist ad, which was creepy as hell.

I'm not sure you're focusing on anything but accusing me of speaking over women at this point though so... I'm just going to bow out.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure you're focusing on anything but accusing me of speaking over women at this point though so...

I'm pointing it out because you're a good dude and I know you don't mean to. Like I said: by definition you're just not seeing the same stuff. And... look, may I be blunt? I generally don't talk about my worst sexual experiences with guy friends, even very close guy friends. It just won't come up. That doesn't mean they don't trust you or aren't close to you. I'm just saying... well, you're a guy. Just like my guy friends aren't going to talk about certain things with me.

Re: Absolutely.

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-12-12 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Again, our experience differs.

I don't really have close male friends, per se (well okay, I have one or two, but they're largely not really a part of my life these days).

My close female friends are the only friends with whom I share terrible/traumatic experiences, and in return they talk about similar ordeals. I'd rather not get into specifics.

I don't expect that to be the case for most female-male friendships, but it's true for me personally. The reality that you're talking about might be a common (heteronormative?) one, but it's not my reality.

DA

(Anonymous) 2015-12-12 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Okay so, let me get this straight. It doesn't matter if the guy describes himself positively because he could be deluded. If his partner describes him that way it doesn't quite "count" either because she could be a battered wife defending him?

Seems like you've decided what you want to believe and nothing is going to convince you.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: DA

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-12-12 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
No. If you actually read what I told Herpy, of COURSE I agree that there are good guys out there. I'm saying that there are a hell of a lot of bad ones and your odds of hitting one are high.

It doesn't matter if the guy describes himself positively because he could be deluded.

There are very few people out there who like to introduce themselves by talking about how shitty they are. "Hi! I like long walks on the beach and sometimes feel ashamed about my boundary issues." No, of course not.