Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-04-11 05:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #3386 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3386 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Bit early today, sorry!
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #484.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
To be fair to children though, with things like Sailor Moon and a lot of localised anime and games, a lot of names and places were changed that didn't reflect anything Japanese at all (eg: Usagi to Serena; Katsuya Jonouchi to JOEY WHEELER WHOOOOOO). It's kinda dumb to stick with the "they're white, right?" once you're an older nerd and have access to internet to already know better.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, that's why I mentioned "sheltered" for kids. Which is in itself nothing to be ashamed of, kids believe in Santa Claus etc and aren't embarrassed of it. Being unable to accept that you didn't know everything when you were a kid is a sign of deep insecurity imo.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 01:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)Well, if a fan who's a teenager doesn't know that anime is Japanese and that it's dubbed in english, yeah, they're pretty goddamn stupid IMO, even without internet. I mean, someone who's never heard of anime but who occasionally saw kids watching Pokemon here or there would be a different story, maybe, but not an actual fan or regular viewer.
Kids get a pass.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 04:06 am (UTC)(link)Now, if we're going to talk about how the Japanese sometimes do unfortunate stereotypes of black people, then we can talk racism. But "they're all really white because I read a blue haired teen named Nagisa from Japan as white because Japanese people can ONLY have super racist caricature or they're really white."
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 12:21 am (UTC)(link)So Brock is not only Asian, he's SUPER Asian.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 12:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 02:02 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 10:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)http://imgur.com/1c4Wg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zvj2wdoCTPg/hqdefault.jpg
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--BmYLmri3--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/18289orcg9293jpg.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8wU_xlCQAAQKyN.jpg
Even Japan thinks that some anime characters look white.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Anime characters reflect Asian beauty ideals. Which have existed for millennia without influence from European cultures.
I mean, those ideals were drastically different and reflected a more stereotypically Asian appearance before the global dominance of European cultures. Oval faces and single-lidded eyes were the beauty ideal in Edo Japan and before and changed to double-lidded eyes and faces with sharply defined jaws out of pure coincidence that has nothing to do with people after coming into contact with white people.
But I assure you. It is nothing to do with that. At all. It is just like how pale skin is a marker of wealth, thus beauty, even though it isn't anymore and everyone works indoors in much of industrialized Asia and the beauty ideals in other parts of the industrialized world have shifted accordingly to reflect the fact that rich people now have more leisure time to tan. It is a sign of wealth and has nothing to do with white people or white beauty ideals, even though white people are often used to advertise whitening creams.
You racist, imperialist whitey. You only think this because you are racist.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-11 23:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-11 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 11:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 12:19 am (UTC)(link)It's kind of scary how easily white people think that the rules of animation (making your main character stick out with more detail, large eyes for expressiveness, bright hair to give the character a distinct visual style, a simple, small mouth and nose to offset the large eyes (something seen in Western animation a lot as well), etc) is somehow indicative of white superiority.
Do you speak Japanese? You do realize the majority of Japanese people find this whole "anime characters are white" debate rather pathetic and laughable whenever someone brings it up, right? They think it's extreme narcissism that we can see a production drawn by and for Japanese people, aimed towards a Japanese audience, aired in Japan, and see Western Whiteness portrayed there instead.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 09:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 11:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 18:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 19:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 23:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 11:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 03:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 10:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 14:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-12 14:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 23:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 10:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 12:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)