Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-08-25 07:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #3522 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3522 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Star Wars]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Great British Bake Off, series 5]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[Star Wars]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:08 am (UTC)(link)I really, really wish authors (and actors/ directors/ singers/ etc) would shut the fuck up more when they get bad reviews. Your work is not for everyone. Get over it. And if EVERYBODY hates your work? Maybe you should think about that. Sure, vent to a friend, just don't post about it on Twitter or your blog. It makes you look insanely petty and insecure.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:19 am (UTC)(link)Not that I could read more than a chapter of 50 Shades either. But that writer was just bad in the sense that I'm not sure EL James knows how to write. Chuck Wendig obviously knows how to write. He just doesn't know how to relax.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 00:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
He cites several other reasons for bad reviews including the writing style (even doing a whole other post on why he likes that kind of writing but he understands that not everyone does), people being bitter about losing the old canon, and "simply that people don’t like the book".
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:29 am (UTC)(link)If he had just said, "Those who hate this book for the gay characters, shame on you" no one would care. But he chose to (partially) act like those who didn't like it did so because of there being gay characters. Hence "I'm not saying it was an anti-gay conspiracy, but it was an anti-gay conspiracy."
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 01:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I couldn't get through this book at all and I've read almost all of the old Star Wars books. It's the writing style, it's just not as gripping.
no subject
I'm currently listening to Heir to the Empire 20th anniversary edition in preparation for Star Wars Rebels S3. I had heard Thrawn was cool, but FUCK is Thrawn cool!
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 12:40 am (UTC)(link)My only real complaint about the book was the fake-out deaths for a certain character. You can do that once and get away with it, but after that it loses all effectiveness.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 01:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
But Wendig? He slaps the craft of writing around.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 02:05 am (UTC)(link)Obviously people hacked Leslie Jones' webpage and posted gorilla pictures and racist slurs because they were legitimately critical of some of the movie writing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 08:51 am (UTC)(link)Instead of getting annoyed at Sony, why don't people get annoyed at the sexist assholes who ruined it for everyone? Sony didn't make up the sexist assholes, Sony just capitalized on them.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 17:46 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)Nobody has said that there wasn't actual sexism or racism. But when comments that are down on something that DON'T contain those vile elements are RECORDED to have been deleted, then you can't seriously keep up the narrative that there was no legitimate complaint.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 21:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-26 22:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-27 16:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-27 23:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-08-28 14:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 02:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 08:16 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-08-26 09:41 am (UTC)(link)(And I still think the non-binary character was a dumb gimmick for the sake of "Oh hey, it's totally trendy these days so I'll include it" instead of anything else.)