Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-09-28 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #3556 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3556 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Lord of the Rings trilogy]
__________________________________________________
02.

[pride and prejudice; unnamed others]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Endeavour]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Tim Curry / Movies: IT, Rocky Horror Picture Show, Clue, Legend]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Loud House]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[MST3K]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

So hey. Listen.
I fear that someone has lead you to believe that good fiction means writing every single little thing. How many books have you read that detail every time the protagonist goes to the bathroom? I mean they must have to pee during the story, right? It's unrealistic that they wouldn't. So how many bathroom scenes do you want to read?
Messiness depends on what you do, but: you are under no obligation to mention the mess. Don't mention it unless it's serving a function. Is it telling us something important about the characters? I want to make sure you're not QWOP'ing yourself into something clumsier than it needs to be.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 12:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
Most stories don't really talk about this stuff because it isn't really that interesting. It's only interesting if it's saying something about the characters. That's why I mention the bathroom--you'd only write about your character using the bathroom if it reveals something about that character. Otherwise it isn't interesting enough to include for most authors.
There's a danger in being so invested in realism that you end up messing up the flow of your story. Does that make sense? I'm not criticizing you for wanting details, just saying they might not be necessary.
Put another way
I mean a lot of us use towels but we don't bother using it in a story, especially a SEXY story. It's not that we have towel-related shame, it just isn't something we bother with.
Now if the story ISN'T sexy, and this would show something having to do with character--look how thoughtful and practical Laird Malcolm is!--that's different.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:34 am (UTC)(link)If that makes any sense at all.
Re: So hey. Listen.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
Okay, I'm going to pick this out--I agree with your other stuff, by the way.
Offering advice or picking out a possible pitfall isn't calling someone a bad writer. It's the only way we get good. And good writers can always get better. The day you start interpreting suggestions and criticism as attacks is the day you stagnate.
My advisor loves my writing. I'm currently working with a draft covered in notes anyway. Why? Because she cares about me. Good writers can always get better.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
"Hey you might not even need it in your story we usually don't bother to write about it anyway."
"HOW DARE YOU"
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:05 am (UTC)(link)Oh good grief.
Re: Oh good grief.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:54 am (UTC)(link)Of course not dear
But seriously your overreaction is fucking hilarious. If you dislike me why the fuck are you talking to me? Go write about the sex towel, it's fine. Some people will like it and some won't. Just make sure it's working for your story.
Re: Oh good grief.
(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 06:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Oh good grief.
(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 23:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:49 am (UTC)(link)Leaping straight to "oh, I bet someone's convinced you that every little thing of life must be documented in painstaking detail" defies logic.
Re: So hey. Listen.
You've never read a story that does that? I have.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 06:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 06:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: So hey. Listen.
Re: So hey. Listen.
Re: So hey. Listen.
Re: So hey. Listen.
(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)