case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-28 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3556 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3556 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Lord of the Rings trilogy]



__________________________________________________



02.
[pride and prejudice; unnamed others]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Endeavour]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Tim Curry / Movies: IT, Rocky Horror Picture Show, Clue, Legend]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Loud House]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[MST3K]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
What mood are you going for here?

I fear that someone has lead you to believe that good fiction means writing every single little thing. How many books have you read that detail every time the protagonist goes to the bathroom? I mean they must have to pee during the story, right? It's unrealistic that they wouldn't. So how many bathroom scenes do you want to read?

Messiness depends on what you do, but: you are under no obligation to mention the mess. Don't mention it unless it's serving a function. Is it telling us something important about the characters? I want to make sure you're not QWOP'ing yourself into something clumsier than it needs to be.
Edited 2016-09-29 00:55 (UTC)

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
^^^ this is the smartest advice in this thread

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure how wanting to be realistic about things that generally happen after sex is at all the same as how often someone pees. Everyone pees, without question. Sex is something I have no experience with so I have no frame of reference for, and honestly, I'm a little insulted by your comment.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Then I apologize--I think you misread my tone there.

Most stories don't really talk about this stuff because it isn't really that interesting. It's only interesting if it's saying something about the characters. That's why I mention the bathroom--you'd only write about your character using the bathroom if it reveals something about that character. Otherwise it isn't interesting enough to include for most authors.

There's a danger in being so invested in realism that you end up messing up the flow of your story. Does that make sense? I'm not criticizing you for wanting details, just saying they might not be necessary.
Edited 2016-09-29 01:31 (UTC)
chardmonster: (Default)

Put another way

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Most bodice-rippers aren't all like

And then Laird Malcolm went to Ye Olde Towel Cabinet and pulled out The Sex Towel, which he and Lady Farthingham only used for sex.

"Oh Malcolm!" breathed Lady Farthingham. "You remembered! I get ever so wet when your penis enters my vagina, and I do hate doing laundry."


I mean a lot of us use towels but we don't bother using it in a story, especially a SEXY story. It's not that we have towel-related shame, it just isn't something we bother with.

Now if the story ISN'T sexy, and this would show something having to do with character--look how thoughtful and practical Laird Malcolm is!--that's different.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Not to try to read OP's mind, but I think it's not just a question of feeling like you need to record every piece of minutia. I think there's also something very specific to being a virgin and trying to write or think about sex, where, like... it's really easy to think about sex in terms of your massive and total incomprehension of it, and to think about the fundamental chasm that exists between anything that you could ever think of sex and the actual lived experience of sex, and how little you know about it or could know about it, and all of that kind of thing. And I can easily see how, if someone was trying to write about sex, that could easily translate that into an anxiety that you're going to miss something - something that anyone who's had sex would obviously and immediately know, but that someone who hasn't had sex wouldn't think of. Which then translates into an anxiety for details and realism, as a way to paper over that gap.

If that makes any sense at all.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
I agree! And I'm totally not trying to diminish that. That's why I tried to contextualize it with something like going to the bathroom (i.e. something we all have to deal with but don't usually bother writing about)

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Sure. But my point is that I don't think OP's attitude comes out of being a poor writer paying too much attention to detail. It comes out of inexperience with sex, specifically - like anon said above, they do have experience with peeing, and they don't have experience with having sex, and you don't necessarily know which parts about having sex are going to be things that you don't need to mention like you do with going to the bathroom. And it comes from being anxious about that specific inexperience.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think OP's attitude comes out of being a poor writer

Okay, I'm going to pick this out--I agree with your other stuff, by the way.

Offering advice or picking out a possible pitfall isn't calling someone a bad writer. It's the only way we get good. And good writers can always get better. The day you start interpreting suggestions and criticism as attacks is the day you stagnate.

My advisor loves my writing. I'm currently working with a draft covered in notes anyway. Why? Because she cares about me. Good writers can always get better.
Edited 2016-09-29 02:37 (UTC)

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
Ok, no. You can't just ignore the tone behind what is essentially "I'm afraid you've been mislead you poor sweet summer child." Your commentary wasn't about making a good writer better or a bad writer less bad. It was a condescending ego stroke.

chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
"Hi I'm inexperienced, what is ____ like?"

"Hey you might not even need it in your story we usually don't bother to write about it anyway."

"HOW DARE YOU"

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
Difference being, I wasn't asking about writing. I was asking about sex.
chardmonster: (Default)

Oh good grief.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
If you're going to be this offended when someone you don't even know offers advice, I kind of hope you only get kudos. I'm not sure AO3 comments would sit well.

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously is condescension your only mode?
chardmonster: (Default)

Of course not dear

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I also have anger, lust, and anxiety

But seriously your overreaction is fucking hilarious. If you dislike me why the fuck are you talking to me? Go write about the sex towel, it's fine. Some people will like it and some won't. Just make sure it's working for your story.

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 06:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Oh good grief.

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-29 23:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
That's a fair point and I agree. What I was trying to drive at was that I didn't think about it in terms of a writing flaw.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. It's a question of "if I don't mention this, is the average person going to read it and be all "buhhhh...are they just going to sleep in a puddle of their own mess?" Or is it the sort of thing that one would read and infer that it just wasn't very messy. IDK, because VIRGIN.

Leaping straight to "oh, I bet someone's convinced you that every little thing of life must be documented in painstaking detail" defies logic.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
Leaping straight to "oh, I bet someone's convinced you that every little thing of life must be documented in painstaking detail" defies logic.

You've never read a story that does that? I have.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe the description is part of the turn-on, though? I like a good descriptive sex scene, and I'm probably not the only one.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
You can sleep right on it. Sometimes people talk and then when you sleep it has dried out.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
whoops sorry wrong reply
world_eater: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] world_eater 2016-09-29 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
I would also like to point out that before you can decide what details to include or not, you have to actually know them, so it's very good to ask and it should never be discouraged
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-09-29 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I really don't understand why people are pissed at me for not answering the question when I didn't even comment until multiple people had already answered the question. OP has info, guys.
world_eater: (Default)

Re: So hey. Listen.

[personal profile] world_eater 2016-09-29 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
And I don't understand where you got the impression that I was pissed at you.

Re: So hey. Listen.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-29 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I think OP's the only one pissed off. Everybody else is chill.