[ SECRET POST #3888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #557.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not bothered because to me it's incredibly obvious that time has passed

In the most recent one, Sansa mentioned it'd been weeks since theyd heated from jon, though he probably replied back in thr recent episode or 2. Soooo... it's been weeks.

Also, they've been pretty solid on implying a 1 season to 1 year, at least to me.

Even the raven in the last episode was calculated by some peeps and is theoretically possible.

Got has issues (Jon how'd you not freeze to death like the other dude) but ttime shit ain't it.

[(Anonymous)]

Typos typos everywhere
sorry

[(Anonymous)]

It's not a troll opinion to be critical of sexualizing 16 year olds, or critical of romantic depictions of relationships between 15 year olds and adults. It's fucking weird that the only part of this secret that F!S is apparently capable of comprehending is that it equates 6 year olds and 16 year olds.

And I'm not even sure how much it actually does equate the two, outside of using the word "pedophilia" to describe both. Most of the rest of it seems to be making the point that sexualizing 15 year olds still isn't OK.

[(Anonymous)]

In California? For real? Are you serious?

[(Anonymous)]

Everything about OP's seret is pretty stupid.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

uh well. no. it says anybody who thinks 15 is different from 7 is bending over backwards to defend pedophilia. that is the accusation made. i dont know how you missed comprehending that part of the secret yourself.

[(Anonymous)]

/shrug It's the price you pay for marrying someone 15+ years your junior who has few discernible talents except make up and nails. He seems happy, so who are we to care?

[(Anonymous)]

I am never going to watch this movie and yet I'm scarred anyway. :(

What's the stupidest mistake you've made lately?

[(Anonymous)]

I managed to clog our plumbing system with overcooked pasta, necessitating calling a plumber. What's the stupidest thing you've done recently?

[(Anonymous)]

The show has always been guilty of rather sloppy writing. I'm not sure why people are making a fuss about it now.

[(Anonymous)]

In high school a friend of mine was 15 or 16 at the time, I don't remember her exact age, but she was dating an older guy, older than 18 because he wasn't a high schooler anymore. And guess what, nothing abusive happened and they were a lovely couple and happy together. So yes, excuse me if I facepalm at this "adults dating underagers is WROOOOONG". It depends of the people involved and the relationship, not the numbers.

[(Anonymous)]

It's used in the context of a 15 year old in a relationship with an 18 year old often enough, as if turning 18 suddenly turns the formerly innocent teen into a pedophiliac predator. Which is fucking bullshit.

[(Anonymous)]

And depending on the country, that's well within the age of consent.

[(Anonymous)]

I think the main message the OP wants to get across was that they think sexualizing young characters and ignoring abusive power dynamics in relationships involving them is bad, including for teenage characters, like 15 and 16 year olds.

I don't think that OP says that there's no difference between a 15 year old and a 7 year old. I think OP thinks that sexualizing a 15 year old is still wrong, and the fact that a 15 year old is not a 7 year old doesn't change that. That doesn't mean that there's no difference between a 15 year old and a 7 year old.

[forgottenjester]

Who is this? It kinda looks like Bakura from Yu-Gi-Oh but ???

[(Anonymous)]

I'm glad it inspired you so much. I was resistant to the idea of watching Yuri on Ice for a long time (it just sounded kinda silly) but was when I actually saw it, Yuri's anxiety Really resonated with me.

[forgottenjester]

That sounds hilarious.

[(Anonymous)]

What a coincidence I'm sick of people like you who bend over backwards to equate 15 and 16 year olds (and up) as children so they can call as many people pedophiles as they want to have a moral reason to decry people as something that gets a lot of people angry at them.

If someone refers to something with a 16 year old (or older) as "pedo" I lose ALL ability to take you seriously as well as respect for you. Quit trying to change words to mean what you want them.

[forgottenjester]

Um... when you say here do you mean F!S or fandom in general?

[(Anonymous)]

I just think that, compared to the fuss they made about his Joker, he wasn't actually in the movie a lot.

[(Anonymous)]

Listen, if you actually want to defend 15 year olds having relationships with adults and arguing against the concept of statutory rape, that's one thing, but it's a whole completely different argument to the one that I'm replying to

I also don't really agree with this argument - I think relationships like the one that you're talking about are closer to the exception than the rule - but saying that relationships between 15 year olds and adults are actually fine is responding to OP's secret in a completely different way.

[(Anonymous)]

OP used it to refer to 15 year olds

[forgottenjester]

I'm really happy that you found something that moved you so deeply. I am also proud of you for pushing yourself farther than before. That's a big step and it must have been hard but I hope it was worth it. :)

[forgottenjester]

I don't really care about the movie at all. I care that he was an asshole to other people on and off set. It's unprofessional and people reacting to that are simply the consequences of the actions he chose to take.

[(Anonymous)]

if op had said "sexualizing young characters and abusive power dynamics is bad" then ok sure. i dont agree if its fiction but many people hold that viewpoint, it's not uncommon

what they actually said was drawing a distinction between sexualizing teenagers who are 15 and sexualizing teenagers who are 7, is bending over backwards to defend pedophilia.

thats not the same point. why are you defending someone who literally called drawing a distinction, defending pedophilia? their words are right there.