Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-10-31 06:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #3954 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3954 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #566.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)it is literally exactly what you are doing right now
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:05 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)I tend to assume Moffat lovers are American because DW grew in popularity over there with Eleven. But the opinions of Americans are meaningless for BBC shows. They can buy them but they don't fund them. Moffat seemed to forget that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)I understand that the remit of the BBC as an institution is about making stuff for license payers, but that's not quite the same as talking about funding streams, is it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 12:13 am (UTC)(link)The first 4 Moffat seasons had the same ratings the RTD ones had, it's only the latest two that dropped. So yeah, sorry to burst your hate bubble, but most people enjoyed most of Moffat's run.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 12:43 am (UTC)(link)p l s f i r e h i m b b c
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 14:28 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-10-31 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 02:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 03:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 13:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)[/sarcasm]
I don't suppose I'm a Moffat hater. I can see some tropes in his work that disappoint me, like other television creators. I'd say he's not as ridiculous as J.J. Abrams, and not quite as sharp overall as Joss Whedon. Wait, am I allowed to not insult Joss Whedon? OK, not as sharp as D.C. Fontana, although that's comparing apple turnover to muskmelons.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-10-31 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 01:35 am (UTC)(link)(That's not to say one can't still have critiques of things they love, mind, 'cause of course they can, but there's a difference between critique and flat out hate-watching/ranting.)
no subject
You can think "I dislike this" or "I hate this," and have reasons for it, but then go on with your life and choose not to spend time dwelling on it. Or, you can proceed to launch a crusade, and devote all sorts of time and energy and mental space to the thing, a thing that you don't even like.
There's stuff that's worth being a hater about, but TV (probably) isn't it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)P.S. Watch this video if you really want to enjoy some well-thought-through Moffat criticism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkoGBOs5ecM
The sheer reasonableness of the video pounds home the point harder than anything I could ever say in my Moffat-hating heart. Enjoy. :D You'll never look at your problematic fave the same way again.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 07:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)To be fair there is a ton of valid criticisms for his writing. Moffat does a lot of shit wrong but he also does things right, and it should be recognized when he gets things right. Moffat haters are people who are understandably frustrated with Moffat's many pratfalls but have taken things too far and now refuse to see the talent and quality in his material. With every single thing he writes they are 100% certain that they will hate it, and human beings are nothing if not adept at proving themselves right. Even when he does something objectively phenomenal they will convince themselves it was shit and that everybody hated it.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:04 (UTC) - Expandnayrt
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 22:28 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Now, Sherlock on the other hand. *groans* (So maybe it's either Gatiss's input or Moftiss as a collective unit that I have serious issues with)
I always found so much problematic, gross, sloppy, and just bad about Sherlock, but everyone seemed to be praising the hell out of that while sh*tting on Moffatt's DW.
Sure there may have been some sexist moments with Amy, Clara, and River. But at least they were allowed to have arcs and exist as characters in their own right (as opposed to Molly "sweet wallflower" Hooper and Mrs. " maternal extension of her male tenants" Hudson who basically existed for Sherlock and John to occasionally deign to interact with.
And that's to say nothing of the disgusting treatment of the Irene Adler arc and the grossly racist Yellow Peril episode of 1x02.
But for some reason, everyone acted like Sherlock was "serious" television that you couldn't dare to criticize. Meanwhile, DW was always a bit of a space opera, so people felt more justified in criticizing the direction it took. (Like how "serious" film nerds will tear you apart for criticizing Fight Club but have no issues picking a fight about over a minor plot hole in Star Trek III.)
Thank god, people have finally started to recognize that Sherlock is a plot-whole heavy, self-important piece of cr*p that people only liked because it was "edgy" and/or there was a teeny tiny chance that moderately attractive white males might kiss or something.
At least, Dr. Who had some nice uplifting episodes and a few great moments for its female characters. Sherlock just angered and depressed me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 22:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 01:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 11:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 02:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 02:39 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-01 03:10 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-11-02 22:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-01 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-11-02 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)