Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-01-29 06:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #4044 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4044 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #579.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:36 am (UTC)(link)Because the fact of the matter is, shows that don't have queer characters are dozens upon dozens. And most shows that have queer characters usually have them in secondary parts if not utterly minor ones. Making it out to seem as if queer characters are represented in a fashion many queer people want (complex with their own plots and stories that don't entirely rely on their sexuality or gender while not entirely ignoring that such things do factor into their lives) is being willfully obtuse.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Brooklyn Nine Nine
Black Lighting
Crazy Ex Girlfriend
Grown-Ish
Legends of Tomorrow
Supergirl
Elementary
Madam Secretary
Steven Universe
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-01 09:39 am (UTC)(link)The Shannara Chronicles
New character in MacGuyver reboot states she doesn't sleep with men or women who she's working with, so bisexual.
But I don't think all or enough shows have enough queer representation and "just watch this show, not the show you like aside from not enough queer characters" isn't really helpful.
Also asexual representation is even more difficult to find, Shadowhunters aside.
no subject
And I'm not certain how surprising people with a late-season sexuality reveal when the characters were never developed with that in mind would be good representation anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:45 am (UTC)(link)Plus what the OP listed, although I'm not familiar with all of those shows.
Also The 100 (the main character, Clarke, plus there is (was when I watched it, so presumably still is?) a male couple). House (Remy/13) and The Good Wife (Kalinda), Person of Interest (Shaw/Root), Grey's Anatomy (Callie/Arizona) if older examples work. Grown-ish, although that is a show in its first season, so IDK how well it will do and if it will get a second season. And I'm sure there are more both that I'm not thinking of and that I don't know of because I don't watch a lot of television.
I disagree with the OP that most shows have queer characters, but it's not like there are none of them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-02-01 09:42 am (UTC)(link)Nolan Ross, Revenge, not only in name but shown to have relationships onscreen with men and women.
Micheletto, The Borgias, it didn't end well for his lovers but he was canonically gay.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 04:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 02:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 03:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 04:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 04:30 am (UTC)(link)I don't deny shows have this issue, like I've heard stories of things that TPTB put in regarding Dean and Castiel in recent seasons, but hyperbole, like saying that every popular CW show ever queerbaits despite having gay characters, doesn't help the point.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 04:36 am (UTC)(link)The solution is simple: don't blame the fans, blame the show runners and maybe have them stop fucking queerbaiting. Jesus Christ why is this a hard concept to grasp.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 05:22 am (UTC)(link)I'm not saying it isn't the showrunners' fault when they queerbait. I'm saying that it doesn't happen in every show. While you are saying that all showrunners for CW shows bait fans then laugh at them. Shows decidedly aren't perfect. I want more representation. I'd love for a variety of queer characters on a variety of shows. But when you say that it is every show, then it is easy for people to disprove you and say that the issue doesn't exist at all because they disproved you. The issue does exist. And it shouldn't. It just isn't ubiquitous like you are making it out to be.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 05:35 am (UTC)(link)Pedantic people will argue that point no matter what, though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 07:52 am (UTC)(link)True. But I'd really prefer not to make it easy for them to do so. There are so many issues with representation in shows on television. I'd prefer not to paint all shows with the same brush and instead point out the issues while also pointing out the shows that are doing good things and hope that maybe, somehow, sometime people will change. I am old enough that honestly I'm really encouraged by what I see now versus what I saw growing up. I know it's not perfect. It's far from perfect. But it's a start and hopefully a trend that will continue. I would love for the next generation to have an amazing set of complex characters of all possible variety, including great queer representation. Lambasting everyone, including the shows doing some good things won't accomplish that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 05:38 am (UTC)(link)It doesn't make my statement any less true and by going but not all shows!!! Is derailing when I never said that to begin with.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 05:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 06:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 06:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 06:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 06:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 06:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 07:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 07:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 08:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 10:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 12:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 12:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 13:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 14:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 15:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 16:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-31 00:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-31 03:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 20:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 21:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-31 00:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2018-01-30 12:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2018-01-30 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)LOL. No.
Just because Swen think that every time Emma and Regina are in the same room they want to tear each other's clothes off doesn't mean that the narrative supported that interpretation in any way. And A&E and JMO were always open about the fact that it wasn't and would NEVER be canon.