Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-08-20 04:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #6071 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6071 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[The Beach]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #868.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Seriously, where did anyone get Izuku/Tsuya from?)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 01:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 08:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)I am less likely to want to read or write pornographic fanfic of them though, sorry.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-20 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)If two characters have no chemistry, of course most people won't find them hot together, because people find it hot when characters have chemistry. That's what makes a pairing hot to a lot of people.
Do they in essence end up in the same thing ("no chemistry = this pairing isn't hot to me")? Sure, for the opposite reason of what you think.
Ofc there are edge cases where people ship two characters they find hot that have never interacted or only briefly met - but people then imagine there is chemistry between them were they to ever meet or interact seriously; you rarely find people shipping characters that have canon prolonged, dry, boring interactions with no romantic potential at all.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 12:20 am (UTC)(link)But watch out, someone will come in and say shipping characters who have boring or little to no interaction is common and cite Clint/Coulson or Matt/Mello or one of the other one or two famous cases where it has happened, as if that makes it an everyday occurrence and not seriously just those four times out of all of fandom.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 12:45 am (UTC)(link)That actually applies to one of my current ships, in fact. I don't find either one of them hot on their own but when you put them together, they're smoking and it's all because of their chemistry.
OP of the secret
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 03:17 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2023-08-21 07:43 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 09:46 am (UTC)(link)The OP is absolutely correct, but they've missed a crucial component. The "chemistry" in this case doesn't actually mean chemistry between the characters, but how well the characters mesh with the trope. People find pairings hot because they find the trope hot. So when two characters embody a trope that doesn't appeal to them, they'll see it as the characters having no chemistry since it's not going the way they're interested in.
Which is why shipping characters who have canon prolonged, dry, boring interactions with no romantic potential at all is incredibly common and you'll see it in pretty much every fandom. Hell, my own current main otp is one such pairing and I ship them with burning because the idea of them together is scratching an itch for me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Though, on a different topic, I though Armie Hammer and Timothy Chamalet had minus chemistry in CMBYN, and do think that most people who though they had chemistry just found one or both hot (and/or the scenario).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 02:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 05:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 08:46 am (UTC)(link)I realize "chemistry" is a fairly imprecise way of expressing emotional affinity or sexual attraction, but most of the words people reach for when they're having an informal conversation about what a relationship is missing, for them, are vague. There's always the chance of revealing more about yourself than you mean to, if you seek out the words to articulate why the things these two people direct at each other feel loveless or unpleasant. Or whatever the matter might be. And there's always the possibility that the person you're talking to won't appreciate hearing it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)Me though, I'll flat out say that sometimes folks just don't personally find a pairing hot. I don't think they're "lying" exactly, they just might not realize there's something others see in a pairing. And sometimes there is a lack of chemistry, but that doesn't stop others from seeing a ship's appeal.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-22 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-21 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
To me, chemistry is "both characters gain a new interesting aspect (aka appeal) as a pair rather than solo", and I do think that's what most people mean. For some people that aspect is attractiveness, for others it's dynamic, and for others it's something else entirely.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-08-22 01:06 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)