Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-09-01 05:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #6814 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6814 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Tomba/Tombi]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #973.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 01:32 am (UTC)(link)Well, when it arrived, it was just...chicken on bread. So I called, right? Spoke with the owner. He said, "yeah you have to specify what you want on it." I said, "so I have to pay extra to have anything other than chicken and bread?" And he said, "no, no, we won't charge you extra."
"But the way your online menu works, adding anything is an extra 50 cents."
"No no, don't use the online menu. We can't do anything about the online menu, we just have to go by what comes in. You have to call us."
"........what."
We proceeded to have a back and forth in which he insisted that he has absolutely no control over the menu on the website for his own store (and to be clear, it's not a chain! It is a goddamn single location restaurant owned by this one guy!). Somehow, patrons who go to the website are just supposed to magically know that, in order to not get charged extra to order a sub that has more than meat and bread on it (and that already costs $13.50!), they need to call, and not use the online ordering system. There is nothing on the website explaining this, of course.
You know what, F!S? I call fucking bullshit. I call bullshit on the idea that this guy can't do anything about the online menu for his own store, the menu that somehow precisely matches the items he has for sale despite supposedly being conjured at random from the ether. I think he was making that shit up to cover his ass, because I think he profits off of people not calling in to get the sub as advertised. Anyone who orders online, and knows that they need to add every single ingredient themselves, winds up paying extra for the sub.
In conclusion: fuck that guy and his restaurant.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 02:56 am (UTC)(link)It really sucks that that happened but honestly I’d give them another try. Also, you can ask if they take orders over the phone for a lesser price. And if their website has a banner for an app, I’d download that because some of these platforms let restaurant owners do things a little more like you’d expect in their app vs what they allow on the website. Plus, if you travel, you can always check if there are any mom and pops around you. Those places tend to have little to no advertising and you can sometimes find some hidden gems that way.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 03:18 am (UTC)(link)It's bad business to use a wonky platform that adds extra charges onto your customers' orders and then say, "but you should have known to call us, and also we had no choice but to add this to our website." The fact that it's common doesn't make it any less ridiculous.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 04:17 am (UTC)(link)Stick to McDonald’s in the future because that’s the kind of company that can afford to put up with nightmare asshole customers like you. Their lives can’t be destroyed by bad reviews from argumentative customers who don’t have a fucking clue what they’re talking about.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 04:41 am (UTC)(link)They don't need to make a site that takes orders. They just need to make cheap site with a menu and a phone number. If this is how they work.
In what way is OP nightmare fucking customer for being upset for not getting what they ordered?
You sound like one of this owners, not a good look.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 05:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 11:25 am (UTC)(link)Where in the world are you getting those prices from? I'm part of a couple of small organizations that have basic websites. One is through Google's free service, so it cost $0.00 for us to set it up, and $0.00 for us to maintain it. The other is a whopping $96/year to maintain.
There is no reason for a small business to spend $45,000 a year on a website that lists their hours, address, and phone number. It is surely costing this restaurant more money to pay for an online ordering system that doesn't work right than it would be for them to post a picture of their menu and prompt customers to call in.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 11:30 am (UTC)(link)Also, the restaurant wouldn't even have to change their current setup if they simply made the online default sub with the standard dressings - the way they give it out when customers call in. This is an entirely self-made problem by the owner, either through greed or incompetence.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 04:07 am (UTC)(link)OP, however, is right that any online menu should have a description of the 'default' that comes with the base sub and that shouldn't reasonably be just chicken and bread. there are expectations - and laws - about how you represent and advertise your food in pictures, which this restaurant is breaking.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 04:19 am (UTC)(link)I will say that the first time I encountered the exact same situation as OP, I paused my ordering and called the restaurant because I was confused if the included stuff had to be selected and if I would be charged additional for it. It took like 30 whole seconds of my life to get an answer and submit my order.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 10:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 11:35 am (UTC)(link)I have done something about it. I've taken my business elsewhere, to a restaurant that doesn't use online ordering at all.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 04:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 11:32 am (UTC)(link)You shouldn't have to assume that the menu you're using to order online is incorrect. And if it is, and it's impossible for the business to fix it, then that function shouldn't be there at all.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)i don't really have a horse in this debate and didn't touch on calling them to order or not, so no need to argue with me about that.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 03:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 11:39 am (UTC)(link)Apparently, that's very unreasonable. It seems that I am an illogical person who doesn't want solitions, and that I should stick to McDonald's. /s
I guess people here feel some sort of outsized obligation to support small businesses, regardless of the quality of their services.
Re: Vent
(Anonymous) 2025-09-02 05:08 am (UTC)(link)