Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-06-20 07:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #1630 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 08 pages, 187 secrets from Secret Submission Post #233.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 - take it to comments/wank elsewhere ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 04:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 04:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 04:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
I think that there are people out there who are uneducated and have a skewed view of humanity, often an egocentric, ethnocentric, "heteronormative" (re: homophobic) view. These people should have things patiently explained to them. They may be unwilling to change. Move on to tactic 1. However, if all you do is whine and bitch and rage and scream, rather than actually speaking plainly and openly and calmly and politely, they're even more likely to dig in their heels and become more resistant and prejudiced and biased.
I also think that there are people out there who like to joke. About everything. Themselves, the things they love, the things they hate, the things that don't matter to them. I personally see this as the South Park comedy method - make fun of everything equally. That's not to say they don't respect and even understand what they're making fun of. Hell, they could be making fun of themselves. You really don't know. So, especially if people are willing to communicate and even apologize for any misunderstandings or hurt caused by their words, I don't see the harm in making fun.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 05:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 05:51 am (UTC)(link)I don't think anyone's obligated to give that benefit of a doubt to a random person telling an offensive joke, and I definitely don't think the burden of educating bigoted people falls on the shoulders of their victims.
Your main goal here seems to orbit around the Be Nice Brigade which puts the focus back on the feelings of the person who was in the wrong. That's ridiculous. What if the victim doesn't WANT to ignore it? They should just suck it up, because yelling would hurt the other person's feelings? What? Why does the moral maturity of a bigot lie in the hands of their victim? Do you know how often minorities are told to be quiet because they'll make a scene, they'll make other women/blacks/jews/anything not a white male look bad?
I want you to reread the first comment you got, and really try to figure out why you defaulted on assuming that the joke wasn't worthy of being shot down, and why it was so important to you to assure that person they had nothing to apologize for (probably!!!). Was it because the poster just seemed sad and you wanted to cheer them up? Isn't it just as possible that several people were made sad by their hilarious joke? Why was your immediate thought that it was just a bunch of uppity people complaining?
But I think this will be my last time trying to explain any of this on F!S, this place has become the squatting grounds for the Be Nice Brigade and I lost the patience to calmly and sweetly explain why someone should get off my foot ages ago.
Also you don't know how to use re:.
no subject
The sad part is, these situations are usually handled in the latter context, nowadays, because the vast majority of "Social Justice" warriors that I've had the pleasure of dealing with lately really were either people who just wanted to shout over every microscopic offense - and yes, I do mean microscopic, including an "offense" against a demographic that I am a part of - or idiots who don't listen to both sides of an argument.
And no. I didn't assume that the "they yelled at me for my joke" anon was in the right. I did say that in many cases, you should apologize. However, under certain circumstances (such as dealing with assholes), there are instances where he/she would be in the right to stand his/her ground. I'm sorry if it sounded like I was trying to imply that this situation is more common when in reality, it just took more effort and thus more wording to exemplify a time when this would be the case.
I'm sick of being bitched at and having to spend half the night defending myself for a single step into not-quite-politically-correct linguistics, because I'm really not that well-spoken and I'm actually very socially awkward. This doesn't make me a bad person, but it does lend itself to a lot of faux pas. And about 95% of the time, they're just a poorly worded thought taken out of the intended context. Surprise, I'm not perfect. But I do know it, and I am working on it. I'd be happy to apologize if people would be mature enough to tell me SIMPLY AND POLITELY that they're hurt, rather than immediately trying to make me out to be the bad guy or just outright acting like five-year-olds. If I wanted to deal with kids, I'd spend time with them.
And as per my misuse of "re:," you're probably right, I got a bit lazy re: my linguistics for a moment there. I'm sorry.
In short: No, I don't want victims to be a doormat. I want them to say that they have a problem without becoming bullies or annoying little twerps, themselves.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)Oh why don't you go to your #1 very helpful "tactic" of ignoring them? Then everyone can be happy! Except you, the victim, but by your own advice you shouldn't speak up because then people will find you to be an annoying little twerp for defending yourself. :(
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-22 00:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-21 03:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject