Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-01-10 07:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #1834 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 89 secrets from Secret Submission Post #262.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 4 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 02:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 02:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm not here to stir up tons of wank and add more flames to the fire by sending a bunch of people over there; what I said was mostly just a tongue-in-cheek observation because there's a fair amount of crossover between the two comms.
Basically OP feels slighted because they messaged somebody and received no reply, assuming the recipient of the message is deliberately ignoring them. Most of the replies have been some mix of "you're not entitled to a response or any of the recipient's time and attention" and "they might not be deliberately ignoring you; there are tons of other reasons they haven't messaged you back (e.g. they forgot)." Even people who agree that ignoring is rude have agreed that OP was jumping too quickly to conclusions.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 04:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 04:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Even the OP admitted that it was reasonable to be uncomfortable with the request, they just wanted a reply. I don't know if your French HP fans would prefer a "no" or no response at all; the comments clearly showed that a lot of people varied on what they considered rude or not. So I wouldn't lose much sleep over it. And you can still respond saying "I've given this a lot of thought and have decided I feel uncomfortable with that" or something.
Now as the other anon said, translators typically credit the original author and link, listing themselves only as translators. The likelihood of this also goes up a lot when they've asked permission first. The OP of the rant is apparently also willing to translate all comments back to the original author so they can get the foreign-language reviews too.
But that doesn't mean you should feel obligated to do it or anything. If it makes you uncomfortable, that's pretty much the beginning and end of it, and you can say no (or nothing, and people will back that up).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 04:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 04:55 am (UTC)(link)People compared someone seeing you reading a book on a park bench, and trying to be friendly about the book to a woman having her agency taken away.
What the actual fuck.
no subject
ETA: I did think the comparison between unwanted e-mails and sexual assault was totally off-base though. Not the same thing at all.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-11 06:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 02:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm not here to stir up tons of wank and add more flames to the fire by sending a bunch of people over there; what I said was mostly just a tongue-in-cheek observation because there's a fair amount of crossover between the two comms.
Basically OP feels slighted because they messaged somebody and received no reply, assuming the recipient of the message is deliberately ignoring them. Most of the replies have been some mix of "you're not entitled to a response or any of the recipient's time and attention" and "they might not be deliberately ignoring you; there are tons of other reasons they haven't messaged you back (e.g. they forgot)." Even people who agree that ignoring is rude have agreed that OP was jumping too quickly to conclusions.
no subject
I wouldn't exactly call it a litmus test, though. Big difference here is that OP of this secret knew and was friends with the person they're talking about wanting to reconnect with.
and stalked the hell out ofa random stranger. Obviously, OP's friend doesn't owe them a response, either, but there's a huge difference in getting messaged out of the blue by an old fandom friend vs. by some entitled creeper you've never spoken to.no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)I've read through that thread and I'm seriously wondering where it says/implies that the OP is a stalker (and creepy) at that? I mean, I understand the whole entitled thing even if I don't agree with it (I don't, it's not entitled to expect an answer to a polite question, that's how I was raised) but I'm really not getting the stalker comment...
Is it because they checked whether the other person was online or not? Because I'd definitely do that if I were excited/waiting for someone to reply to me. Again, that doesn't necessarily equal to 'stalking the hell of a random stranger' nor being an 'entitled creeper', at least not to me?
The reason I'm asking this is because THIS is why I am very wary of talking to people on the internet in general. People blow the smallest thing out of proportion and that's very scary and anxiety inducing to someone like me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-11 19:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 04:08 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-11 08:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-01-11 15:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 03:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-01-11 03:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject