case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-07-01 03:19 pm

[ SECRET POST #2007 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2007 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 111 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ], [ 1 - empty image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-02 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
There are any number of reasons a person might not choose to identify with the feminist label.

For me, I have two major reasons. One, I've had a fair amount of association with SJW-type feminists and would prefer not to be associated with them. Two, I don't believe in everything that the majority of feminists believe. The major difference is that I'm pro-life. And I'm willing to bet that if I *did* claim to be a feminist I'd get a lot of "but you're not a REAL feminist!!1!" because I don't think abortion is okay.

I just believe what I believe. I believe all people are equal and equally deserving of life, liberty, and other basic rights and of being treated with respect and that it's ok to be who you are and like what you like.

inb4 abortion wank...not trying to start that shit guys
Edited 2012-07-02 01:06 (UTC)
ext_1340678: Blue coffee mug (Stock ~ Blue cup)

[identity profile] natural_blue_26.livejournal.com 2012-07-02 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Very well put and I agree with you on both points :)
fritzier: (Default)

[personal profile] fritzier 2012-07-02 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
exactly

except i just classify the SJWs as radfems-- while they may be feminists, they are just. extremists. and i'm certain that the rest of the movement did not intend for anyone like that to happen...
thoreal: (Default)

[personal profile] thoreal 2012-07-02 10:35 am (UTC)(link)
Radfem doesn't mean extremist, dude. Radfem means you believe in the existence of the patriarchy as a system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

[personal profile] stainless 2012-07-02 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Whoa whoa whoa.

That makes me pretty uncomfortable. I have no problem with people identifying as radical feminists and believing a whole slew of things, but I don't like the idea that people automatically fall under the label. I think people have some really good reasons for not wanting to be associated with the label because of some of the extremists and their bigotry (especially their rampant transmisogyny.)
yeahscience: (Default)

[personal profile] yeahscience 2012-07-02 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Except... words mean things? The term "radical feminist" is often misused to mean "extreme feminist," but that's not actually what it was coined to mean. It refers to a specific movement within the greater umbrella of feminism itself.

(no subject)

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-07-03 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] yeahscience - 2012-07-03 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-07-03 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] yeahscience - 2012-07-03 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-07-03 02:00 (UTC) - Expand
fritzier: (Default)

[personal profile] fritzier 2012-07-03 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
oh my actual what, really

because i've always seen it used to shun extremist feminists that fall under the "man-hating" category, by people who definitely do believe in the existence of the patriarchy as a system of oppression

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 05:59 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, honestly, if you're anti-choice you should not call yourself a feminist.

So it's good that you don't. Thanks for that.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-02 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
rme at "anti-choice".

I don't call pro-choice people "anti-life". That would be absolutely ridiculous, and it doesn't make sense either. Do you realize how much of a douche you look like when you go out of your way to slap a falsifying label on someone you don't agree with?

Thanks for proving my point. Both of them, really.

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't have even mentioned it dawg. While I hate the idea of abortions as well I've gotten into the same argument a few times. People have their heads to far up their asses to think there's more than just black and white.

You're automatically anti-choice, male, Republican and Christian because us guys on the internet don't judge. No sir.

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol, the only person implying they're male, Republican or Christian because they're anti-choice is you.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 22:38 (UTC) - Expand
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-03 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think people assume you're male if you say you're pro-life. They might assume you're a republican, though. (I am neither...)
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

[personal profile] stainless 2012-07-02 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
For what it's worth, I totally agree. I'm pro-choice, but I think calling people "anti-choice" is a cheap dig (just like calling people "anti-life" is.) I've never understood what's so horrible about calling people what they want to be called. It's easy enough to say "These people go by an innocuous name, but I think they're very wrong in a very destructive way" and avoid silly name-calling.

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Except that if you're pro-choice you're not 'anti-life.' All that being pro-choice means is that you respect women's bodily autonomy and right to choose whether or not they want to be an incubator for an unborn baby.

If you're 'pro-life' that means you are against women's ability to choose what happens in their body, ie you are anti-choice.

It's really simple. Stop trying to make false equivalencies.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-03 02:32 pm (UTC)(link)
So am I anti-choice if I believe you shouldn't be allowed to pick up a gun and shoot someone who didn't provoke you, or drive a car on a sidewalk on a school campus, or bring explosive material onto an airplane? And it's not just human lives that curb choice - it's also not okay to have sex with someone who has been drugged, or set fire to someone else's house, or lock a person up in your closet for a week.

People who are pro-life aren't out to destroy the choices of people. We just recognize that one person's rights end where the other person's rights begin. Society is CHALK FULL of instances where peoples' choices are limited in order to protect the rights of others. No one is purposely trying to figure out how we can eliminate the choices of women even more (trollish glee)!!! We like people to have as many choices in their lives as possible - we just recognize that those choices have limitations in order to protect others' rights to be alive, be free, and ultimately make their own choices one day too.

In the same way, I know that most pro-choice people aren't out to see how many babiez they can kill, and most don't have a flippant attitude about the value of human life. We just disagree on things like whether an unborn person is a living human, whether their right to life is especially important, etc. I know most people in existence would like to eliminate *situations* where women find themselves facing that choice.

So I don't think you are anti-life. And I am not anti-choice. Most of all, your unwillingness to respect the label I choose for my beliefs shows me that you are not able to have a reasonable discussion about it, that you would have a very hard time being objective, and that you're more interested in being rude to people you disagree with than actually accomplishing anything.
fuchsiascreams: (Default)

[personal profile] fuchsiascreams 2012-07-02 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, but do you understand that it's possible to be pro-life and also pro-choice at the same time?

da

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
...wow, there is a name for my position? Like, I'd prefer if there weren't abortions at all, but I recognize that sometimes that's simply the best decision for both the baby-to-be-born and the mother (and by extension, the family and environment they're being born into).

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
...that's just called being pro-choice. People who are pro-choice don't actually like abortion and they think it would be pretty great if women weren't ever in the position to need one, but they know that sometimes it's just the best choice. You can be pro-choice while also knowing that it would never be the right choice for you personally.

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-02 20:48 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-07-02 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it's not. Pro-lifers are by definition anti-choice.

Unless they're using some different meaning for the word pro-life that doesn't include being against abortion.

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-03 14:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-03 22:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-04 18:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-04 20:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-07-04 20:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-05 14:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] fuchsiascreams - 2012-07-06 18:01 (UTC) - Expand
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2012-07-02 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
I believe all people are equal and equally deserving of life, liberty, and other basic rights and of being treated with respect and that it's ok to be who you are and like what you like.

Except when you want an abortion. *snort*
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-02 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
What part of "I'm not trying to start abortion wank" did you not read?

I mean, do you really want to go there?
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2012-07-02 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I never accused you of starting wank tho?

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-03 14:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] world_eater - 2012-07-03 14:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-03 14:34 (UTC) - Expand
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

[personal profile] stainless 2012-07-02 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I am pro-choice, but I totally understand you. I was pro-life for a long time when I was younger and it used to drive me crazy that people would assume that had to do with men or with religion. Actually it had to do with having a disability and with being born prematurely. The preemie thing made me uncomfortable with the idea that you're a baby if you're out and a fetus if you're in -- I just happened to become a person quickly? It didn't make sense to me. And disability made me really leery of some people's reasons for aborting (and still does.) I ultimately decided that making abortion illegal would hurts more than it would help, but I still feel really strange sometimes when I hear people talk about "lumps of cells" or "on demand and without apology!" and sneering at people who find the whole thing more complicated.

So... I hope this doesn't begin any wank. but let me just say I disagree with you but don't think that means there's something wrong with you or horrible about you. For whatever it's worth. :-)
Edited 2012-07-02 16:56 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-07-03 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually also kind of dropped the "I think abortion should be completely illegal!" tack a while ago...probably because I realized it wouldn't do much good.

But I don't think abortion is okay, except where the mother is in danger blah blah etc. I would rather see a change in our culture where we truly value all human life and seek to preserve and cherish it, than a law eliminating abortion across the board. I want to see an overhaul in our adoption and foster care systems, more assistance to women who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy, better sex ed, etc. That kind of thing. But it doesn't feel right to call myself pro-choice because I do value the unborn as humans with the right to life and I don't condone elective abortion in any way.
stainless: Megatron and Starscream standing in wreckage, reads ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US (Default)

[personal profile] stainless 2012-07-03 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Makes sense to me. I think a lot of pro-choice people would call you pro-choice, actually; they see "pro-life" as meaning "holding the view that abortion should be illegal." I understand the desire for simplicity there, but I don't think it really does justice to feelings like yours, where it's "well, I don't want to criminalize it but I still feel that it's wrong."

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-03 14:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] stainless - 2012-07-03 14:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-04 19:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] diet_poison - 2012-07-05 14:44 (UTC) - Expand