Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-07-16 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2022 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2022 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #289.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Yes it's wrong. But it isn't theft. You didn't steal anything. You infringed on the copyright by accessing and distributing unlicensed copies of a copyrighted material.
Words. Mean. Things.
no subject
no subject
[theft] Show IPA
noun
1.
the act of stealing
steal
[steel] Show IPA ,verb, stole, sto·len, steal·ing, noun
verb (used without object)
1.
to commit or practice theft.
Are you completely daft or do you not speak English?
Theft = stealing. Stealing = theft. Piracy =/= theft, ergo piracy =/= stealing.
Piracy is copyright infringement. You have "taken" as per all definitions of theft and stealing legal or otherwise - including your own "kindergarten" 'TAKING without asking' - literally nothing. It is still there. You have accessed and unlicensed copy of something.
Accessing an unlicensed copy of something is wrong and illegal. But it is NOT. STEALING.
...Are we done yet?
No?
PIRACY IS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
no subject
Not that I'm like boo piracy or anything but calling it something else doesn't actually make it something else.
no subject
You are infringing on someone's right to something or stealing their right to their work.
INFRINGING ON A COPYRIGHT IS WRONG, BUT IT IS NOT THEFT. YOU CANNOT "STEAL" SOMEONE'S RIGHT TO THEIR WORK. THAT WOULD MEAN YOU NOW HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS TO THEIR WORK. YOU DO NOT HAVE THAT.
YOU HAVE AN UNLICENSED COPY OF THEIR WORK. THE RIGHTS TO THEIR WORK REMAIN THEIR OWN.
PIRACY IS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. YES, IT IS WRONG, AND IT IS ILLEGAL. BUT IT IS NOT RAPE. OR MURDER. OR ASSAULT. OH, AND IT IS NOT THEFT EITHER. I REFUSE TO BELIEVE LAY PEOPLE ARE TOO FUCKING STUPID TO GRASP THIS CONCEPT.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT LAY PEOPLE ARE TOO FUCKING STUPID TO UNDERSTAND IT?
no subject
no subject
I know you're not, because I'm not wrong, and you're not an idiot. You just want to think something that is wrong is the same as a different thing that's wrong because both are bad and have bad consequences and make you feel bad, and one word doesn't sound as bad as the act and the consequences of the act makes you feel. But at the end of the day, words still mean things.
...Sorry, I've had this argument too many times. I just can't believe people are intelligent enough to learn trigonometry as a required math course but can't understand the difference between two crimes. I just can't do it. My faith in humanity can't take the blow.
"Consider" it something it isn't all you want. Diana Gabaldon considers fanfiction to be the identical to home invasion. They "invaded" her intellectual property! Just like pirates "stole" it! Yarrr! Thar be electronic booty! It's not like I can stop you.
Maybe piracy is more like rape! Or genocide! Or tax evasion! You're "evading" the lawful purchase of the object!
...You wouldn't hide your assets overseas to tax dodge, would you? Then why are you hiding your IP address to use torrents?
DOWNLOADING PIRATED FILMS IS TAX EVASION.
TAX EVASION IS AGAINST THE LAW.
PIRACY - IT'S A CRIME.
no subject
I'm not going to comment on the rape and genocide because I don't think that would be helpful or constructive in any way.
no subject
So... piracy is tax evasion, for the lay person? Even though tax fraud "obtains" literally nothing, not even access to an unlicensed copy? The lay person is incapable of understanding a more nuanced reality than "do bad things with property? Stealing! Stealing is make bad with property"?
Well, you heard it here folks. Piracy is tax evasion.
At least the "lay person" can tell the difference between piracy and genocide, apparently.
That's... ... ...something.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What you are is special.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 07:48 am (UTC)(link)okay I stopped reading this thread with interest when you turned on the "yelling" to drown out others.
I'm gonna stick to calling it stealing.
no subject
You can stop reading something because you don't like the tone of the opposing side, though, obviously. Nor can I stop you from calling something something it isn't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 11:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)When I download pirated copy of Harry Potter, does JKR lose her rights to it?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
stealing (vernacular)
1. piracy
2. tax evasion
3. ????
4. profit
Or something to that effect? Any documented source that states that "piracy" and "tax evasion" are "subcategories" of "stealing"? Any reliable source will do. Because if it's even remotely true I'm sure you could find one. I'm positive I could find one that was like:
duck
1. mallard
2. mandarin
3. other subcategories of duck
or
sports
1. swimming
2. running
3. you get the point
So, like, anything like that?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-17 07:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-07-17 06:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
And fanfiction can be described as home invasion. Diana Gabaldon proved it.
Tax evasion isn't "having something that isn't yours", it's falsifying legal documents so that you appear to owe less by contract to the gov... oh, forget it. Nevermind.
No, I get it. You've already pointed out that the lay public has no concept of nuance and no problem equating vastly different actions, effects, and consequences because they make them feel bad, and they have to do with property. "Stealing = property bad", according to the lay people you're representing. Not any dictionary I've ever read, but I may just be behind the times.
Okay, stealing = "property bad". Tax evasion and piracy are both "property bad", therefore stealing. I follow the... ...logic.
no subject
Wait. If you lie about how much you owe and keep the difference how do you not have something that isn't yours?
Also I feel "vastly" is incorrect word choice but I don't have the same kind of commitment as you and therefore do not plan on arguing it out over a thread.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-07-17 07:00 am (UTC)(link)The same is true of intellectual property. If someone swipes your Harry Potter DVDs, they have stolen them from you; if that person illegally downloads copies of the movies, they have not stolen anything, because no one has been deprived of property. Pirating may still be wrong, and if you want to argue that, I won't object, but in order for something to be "stealing," another person has to be missing their stuff.
no subject
If I write an album, and find myself unable to sell it because everyone that might want it already has a copy they didn't pay for, has anyone wronged me? No one individually did any harm to me, and yet I've put in a lot of work for no gain besides some ephemeral popularity. This is an extreme example but it's the main motivator for opposing piracy, especially among smaller artists that can't tank the costs of lost sales.