Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-17 03:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2146 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2146 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-17 21:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-17 21:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 19:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 04:46 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 19:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 06:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)And weren't they mostly referred to as Frost Giants?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 04:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 04:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)Linguist? Or just hobby descriptivist?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 05:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Were they speaking English?
Then 'jotuns' is completely correct. Just like 'ninjas', or 'cherubs' - or 'jotnar', 'ninja', or 'cherubim'. The thing about English and loanwords is it's completely acceptable to pluralize like the source language, or like English.
In fact, in some cases, it's more acceptable to go with the English than to try to pluralize it like the source language - you're less likely to end up with abominations like octopi, virii, or peni/penii - properly octopodes (octopus is from Greek, not Latin), viri (virus, not virius), and penes (penis, not penus nor penius). Octopusses, viruses, and penises are all also acceptable.
no subject
Eight cats? :P
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Especially relating to octopi. I hate the use of the word "octopi" so much, as a Latin student.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 20:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Interesting how no one ever tries to pluralize "bus" as "bi". (Not that they should, since I believe "bus" comes from "omnibus" which is possibly plural and definitely something other than nominative but I can't remember what...)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 04:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 16:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 10:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-17 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 05:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 09:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 05:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-19 04:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 20:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 15:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 18:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
I don't mind when it see it either way in fic. It's a loanword at this point. Loanwords are conjugated by English standards; not in Old Norse or Icelandic, as the case may be.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 05:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-17 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Not that it's a new problem, every time a name not from the english language or even used in that language is used in some movie/Tv show the just decide to speak it however they want, never mind that it's completely wrong. Where I'm from we say names not from our language how they are said in that language and not in our own. And don't even get me started on Latin, Harry Potter was painful because of that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-17 23:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 13:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 16:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 18:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 12:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 01:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 01:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-18 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I mean, I'm Icelandic and find it kind of hilarious when they go BI-FROST, but Laufey is ten times more hilarious than that. "Jotuns" doesn't even register.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 05:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 07:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 09:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 16:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 16:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-19 03:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-20 17:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
2. The singular nominative ending is often dropped in translation, so there's no need to differentiate between jötun/jötunn.
3. If you want to inflect nouns, you also have to inflect names. You'd just look silly if you started saying, “Thorr did X to Loka, so Loki did Y to Thor”.
4. English. Just, English. Jotun is a loanword, English will happen to it.
5. If you really want to correct peoples' Old Norse grammar, go around reminding them that Thor is an áss, not an Æsir. It's much more fun.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 15:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-11-18 20:14 (UTC) - Expand