case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-07 05:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2166 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2166 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

#19 contains a moving .gif.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Penn & Teller]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.
[Spartacus]


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________











[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












20. [SPOILERS for Hollyoaks]



__________________________________________________



21. [SPOILERS for Downton Abbey]



__________________________________________________



22. [SPOILERS for Rudolph (1998)]



__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
even in fandom we shame women for expressing their attractions to people

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
hey listen

making up imaginary stories about characters from fiction is serious business. it's so shallow to come up with imaginary stories about characters from fiction sleeping together just because they happen to be attractive. it's so much more authentic and real if you come up with stories about imaginary characters from fiction having deep, passionate relationships with each other. it's much more worthwhile.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-07 23:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-07 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-07 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-07 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] brooms - 2012-12-08 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Not in my experience. Egging on, more like.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been a Bond fan since Moonraker. Let's face it, Bond has always been about flirting, humour and insanity. Not to ship him with anyone that breathes is unthinkable. Just enjoy the ride.

Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Daniel Craig has gone on record saying he is very much in support of James Bond being bisexual, and wouldn't mind having a "Bond Boy" instead of a "Bond Girl" in a movie someday.
And this wasn't like, this year, this was in 2006 or 2007.

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
well, I mean, Bond is in British intelligence

eyyyyyyyyyyy

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
This is one of the many reasons I love Daniel Craig.

My two major dreams for the franchise are either a Bond Boy, or Idris Elba as the next Bond.

On a slightly more shallow note, I'm on board with the OP. GIVE ME ALL YOUR 00Q.

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-08 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? Could I have a link, please? Not every day a guy recognizes bi guys exist.

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 01:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 02:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 05:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 20:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 01:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-08 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] elaminator - 2012-12-08 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 05:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] seiberwing - 2012-12-08 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] visp - 2012-12-08 06:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-08 10:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:33 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-08 10:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Daniel Craig

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 11:09 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-07 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Congratulations, you're now one of those shallow wimmin folk.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
There isn't any pretty in that ship. Whatever miniscule amount of attractiveness the guy with the glasses might have brought to it, is completely cancelled out by Daniel Craggy's ugliness. He has a face like a proboscis monkey.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Ladies' man or not, did you miss that "what makes you think it would be my first time?" thing he said in this very same movie? :D

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] visp - 2012-12-08 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-09 17:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-23 10:28 (UTC) - Expand
blueonblue: (Default)

[personal profile] blueonblue 2012-12-08 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
What's wrong with shipping for shallow reasons? Fandom is supposed to be fun, and if that's your idea of fun, go for it!

I don't ship it, but Q's Q mug is adorable.

[personal profile] gamma_orionis 2012-12-08 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
Hooo boy, I would love to see an explanation as to why a ladies' man can't be bisexual.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Being a lady's man does not mean he can't be bi, but aside from that, why do you think it would be *wrong* for him to be bi? I can see it for Craig's Bond - for the others, yeah, not so much.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] seiberwing - 2012-12-08 06:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 07:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 07:48 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Well, neither of these guys is particularly attractive, so don't worry about your cool cred.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
Enjoy whatever you want. I think Bond is straight from everything he has done and his history but if you wanna go bisexual on him, have fun, babe. ♥ I won't judge you as long as you don't dismiss his history.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Fandom is about having fun. I'd be pretty upset to see Bond on screen in a relationship with another man, but I enjoy reading fic about it. I love reading any Bond fic that's in-character and a lot of the slash fic involving him manages to do that.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
Same. It's a textbook example of just shipping two prominent dudes with no real justification, but I love it. Their banter was fantastic.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

And good 00q recs?

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2012-12-08 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
This ship/fandom is already being inundated with badfic, wading through the crap for the gems is getting tiresome a lot faster than I was expecting. Anyone got any recs for the good stuff, while we're here?

Re: And good 00q recs?

[personal profile] rivia - 2012-12-08 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: And good 00q recs?

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-08 04:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: And good 00q recs?

[personal profile] maldeluxx - 2012-12-09 10:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: And good 00q recs?

[personal profile] nyxelestia - 2012-12-09 10:20 (UTC) - Expand
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

Fer realz?

[personal profile] iceyred 2012-12-08 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
OP, ship whatever you want. Be shallow, write pwp, don't use a beta, go for the pretty.

That what fandom is for. To cut loose and be selfish and fangirl. It doesn't hurt anybody and it makes you happy. You can't be serious and -deeeeeeeeep- all the time. Save that for politics and real world issues. This is fandom. Let your shallow freak flag fly.

Now, does anybody have any 00Q recs? Barring that, is there a kink meme?

Re: Fer realz?

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 05:22 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-08 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
ONE OF US

ONE OF US

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-08 06:26 (UTC) - Expand
sarnath: Fai from Tsubasa reservoir chronicle (Default)

[personal profile] sarnath 2012-12-08 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, considering how they each represented the theme and conflict of the film, how charged their interaction was, and how their cooperation was representative of the reconciliation of old and new, I think there's quite a few non-shallow reasons to be interested in their interaction (whether it's platonic or not).

Of course, there's nothing wrong with the shallow reasons either!

/Also an old Bond fan shipping them.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see how being a ladies man automatically disqualifies him from being bisexual/bicurious. Daniel Craig himself said he wanted Bond to be a sexual omnivore.

Don't feel guilty about who you ship; you're not hurting anyone.

[personal profile] khronos_keeper 2013-02-15 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
I don't even care that I'm resurrecting a months-old thread, because of some of the erroneous protestations in this thread.

It actually is canonical that James Bond is sexually curious. If anyone's ever read "007 in New York", you can read a fascinating and kind of hilarious bit with him fantasizing about bringing a lady friend to a bunch of kinky sex clubs, even a BDSM joint.

If Bond is curious about BDSM, I really don't think he would flinch too hard about a little bit of same-sex lovin'. JUST SAYIN'. Bond just liked sex, period.